Abstract
Background Carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproic acid (VPA) are long-standing treatments for epilepsy in children. Interestingly, they display unique drug disposition characteristics and maturation of drug metabolizing enzymes further complicates personalized dosing. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling includes these mechanisms and is hence a promising tool to optimize dosing. Our aim is to better support pediatric drug dosing of CBZ and VPA.
Methods All CBZ and VPA dosing simulations were conducted with Simcyp, using available CBZ and VPA compound models linked with adult and pediatric population models. Current Dutch national dosing strategies were simulated to evaluate their appropriateness to achieve therapeutic levels. Where doses could be optimized, alternative dosing strategies were proposed based on simulations.
Results Therapeutic levels of CBZ and VPA will be reached after 1 or 2 weeks of treatment with the current dosing strategies. Simulations suggest a CBZ starting dose of 7 mg/kg/day for neonates rather than 10 mg/kg/day. In contrast, children aged 12 to 18 years may receive a higher starting dose (e.g., 400 mg/day instead of 200 mg/day), to reach therapeutic levels more quickly. For VPA, when higher doses are needed (i.e., ≥30 mg/kg/day), measuring unbound VPA concentrations are advised to guide dosing.
Conclusion We demonstrate that PBPK modeling is a valuable tool to confirm and further optimize dosing recommendations in children. The use of PBPK modeling offers a practical, cost-effective, and swift method to provide valuable comprehensive evidence for guiding clinical practice and potentially informing pediatric drug labeling, thus eliminating the necessity for clinical studies.
Competing Interest Statement
Prof. dr. de Wildt is a paid consultant for Khondrion. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This publication is based on research funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-001822). The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
