Abstract
Background Mismeasurement (measurement error or misclassification) can cause bias or loss of power. However, sensitivity analyses (e.g. using quantitative bias analysis, QBA) are rarely used.
Methods We reviewed software tools for QBA for mismeasurement in health research identified by searching Web of Science, the CRAN archive, and the IDEAS/RePEc software components database. Tools were included if they were purpose-built, had documentation and were applicable to epidemiological research.
Results 16 freely available software tools for QBA were identified, accessible via R and online web tools. The tools handle various types of mismeasurement, including classical measurement error and binary misclassification. Only one software tool handles misclassification of categorical variables, and few tackle non-classical measurement error.
Conclusions Efforts should be made to create tools that can assess multiple mismeasurement scenarios simultaneously, to increase the clarity of documentation for existing tools, and provide tutorials for their usage.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
CJCW is supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (grant EP/S023569/1). RAH is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship that is jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Soci- ety (grant 215408/Z/19/Z). KMT works in the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, which is supported by the University of Bristol and the Medical Research Council (grant MC UU 00032/2). JWB is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (grant MR/T023953/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study did not involve any underlying data. Computing code is available as supplemental digital content.
