Abstract
Background Early specialty palliative care (SPC) involvement in geriatric trauma care improves outcomes, quality of life and healthcare utilization. However, SPC usage is inconsistent and imprecise. A knowledge gap persists in understanding surgeons’ perspectives towards SPC and barriers in geriatric trauma.
Methods The 38-question survey was distributed through a prestigious surgical society’s membership. Subsequently, comparative analysis of responses was completed based on demographic features.
Results 64 surgeons responded (2.8%). 87.5% of respondents identified a potentially life-limiting diagnosis/prognosis and 76.6% conflicting goals of care as consult triggers. 59.4% reported comfort in addressing the palliative needs without SPC consult. The perception of limited SPC availability (54.7%) was a common barrier. 28.1% felt that patient/family resistance was the most common reason not to consult SPC.
Conclusions Surgeons reported comfort with goals of care discussions, perceived limited SPC availability, and the perception of patient/family resistance as limitation to consultation. These data provide previously unexplored insight from trauma surgeons.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Dignity Health St. Josephs Medical Centers Institutional Review Board (IRB# PHXNR-23-500-253-71-47)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
