Abstract
Background The critical care unit is a dynamic environment that necessitates a high volume of daily clinical decisions regarding organ support. It is known that decision-making varies significantly between clinicians, even where internationally accepted treatment guidance exists and overall the processes and influences on clinical decision-making are poorly understood. Our aim was to summarise the evidence on the decision-making process and the factors that influence organ support decisions in the critical care setting and 2) conduct a meta-synthesis to generate a model of medical decision-making, illustrating how different factors interact and affect the process.
Methods We conducted a systematic search on three databases (PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) to find relevant papers exploring factors that influenced organ support decisions made by critical care clinicians. A meta-synthesis was then completed on included papers. The data were collated into a common format and cross-compared. This enable the generation of distinct themes/subthemes that were synthesised to develop a higher order interpretation.
Results 33 studies (from 8967 citations) met the inclusion criteria. 21 of these only included nurses, 7 only doctors and 5 were interprofessional. 11 factors that influenced a clinician’s decision-making were identified: experience; professional and personal risk; uncertainty; characteristics of individuals; senior support; team hierarchy; decision making by colleagues; protocols, guidelines and evidence; time and workload; hospital structure; and clinical condition. These were grouped into four themes: human, team, system and patient factors. From our interpretation of the data, we found decision-making is often linear and primarily dictated by disease factors (i.e. patient’s clinical parameters). However, the identified human, team and system factors can place strain on decision-makers and make clinical scenarios more complex. There is scope however to modify these to optimise critical care decision-making.
Conclusion While decision-making surrounding organ support is complex and dynamic, we identified recurring themes that influenced these decisions across different professions and environments. Further studies should focus on understanding how different decision-making processes directly affect patients’ outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=283290
Funding Statement
Barts Charity
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
