Abstract
Background Teamwork is recognised as a vital factor in patient safety, and as such we need valid measurement tools to drive change. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Teamwork Perceptions Survey as a measure of staff perceptions of the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre.
Methods The authors developed a 24-item questionnaire, aligned with the goals of a national team training intervention. The Teamwork Perceptions Survey was administered to New Zealand public hospital operating theatre staff before and after a hospital commencing the intervention. These scores were used to explore the psychometric properties of the tool, using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Results 2409 (1233 pre- and 176 post-intervention respondents) completed the Teamwork Perceptions Survey. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 3 factors (6 items, communication and shared mental model; 6 items, leadership and role modelling; 5 items, trust and accountability) and resulted in dropping 5 redundant items. The final 17-item, three factor solution was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, revealing satisfactory goodness of fit. Cronbach’s alpha was high for the full survey (α = 0.947), and each subscale (communication, α = 0.887; leadership, 6 items, α = 0.911; trust, α = 0.872).
Conclusions These data provide evidence to support the validity and reliability of the Teamwork Perceptions Survey as a measure of staff perceptions of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre. This new measurement tool for the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre has the potential for both measuring and driving quality improvement initiatives in teamwork and patient safety.
Summary
What is already known on this topic – Whilst there are a number of established teamwork measurement tools, many completed by an external observer, or do not adequately address the unique operating theatre environment.
What this study adds – This study supports the validity and reliability of a new measure of staff perceptions of the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre. It fills a previous gap in available measures in that it is self-completed and is designed for the operating theatre environment.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy – The Teamwork Perceptions Survey has the potential for both measuring and driving quality improvement initiatives in teamwork and patient safety in surgical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was part of a larger NetworkZ evaluation study. This project as a whole was supported by the Douglas Joseph Professorship Grant through the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists [grant number DJ17/001]; and the Lottery Health Research Fund [grant number R-LHR-2017-49141].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained for this study as part of a larger NetworkZ evaluation study. The New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work [reference 16/NTB/143].
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
