Abstract
Phenomenon Effective graduate advising is crucial for student success but remains an understudied area, particularly in Health Professions Education (HPE). While the importance of advising is widely recognized, faculty often lack adequate preparation and face competing demands. Current research on advising primarily focuses on other disciplines, neglecting the unique challenges of HPE programs. This study aims to address this gap by exploring leaders’ perspectives on advising practices that optimize student success in HPE graduate programs.
Approach A qualitative interview study using narrative inquiry was conducted to explore leaders’ perspectives on advising practices in graduate HPE programs globally. Purposive sampling was used to recruit program leaders across six World Health Organization regions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using narrative inquiry and developmental advising theory as a framework.
Findings Fifteen HPE program leaders described advising practices focused on academic advancement, personal advancement, and community building. Leaders emphasized the importance of clear communication, goal setting, and student support. While advisors valued building strong relationships with students, challenges arose from balancing professional and personal roles. Findings suggest that a developmental advising approach, incorporating academic, personal, and community-building elements, can enhance student success in HPE graduate programs.
Insights This study underscores the critical role of advisors in graduate HPE programs, revealing that effective advising involves both academic guidance and substantial emotional support. It highlights a gap in the existing literature and advocates for the expansion of developmental advising that addresses not only administrative tasks but also the broader developmental needs of students, such as career advancement and personal growth. The findings suggest that to enhance advising practices, graduate HPE programs should invest in ongoing professional development for advisors, adopt holistic advising models, and allocate resources to support students’ integration into professional communities, thereby preparing them more fully for their future careers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University (Case#: DBS.2022.348).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclaimer: This work was prepared by a civilian employee of the US Government as part of the individual’s official duties and therefore is in the public domain. The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.
IRB: Uniformed Services University (USU) IRB approved the protocol #DBS.2022.348 as exempt under the provision of 32CFR 219.104(d)(2)(i).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
