ABSTRACT
Background Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) are mandated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to assess the cardiovascular safety of new antidiabetic medications before entering the market. However, CVOTs often involve highly selective populations and results may not generalize to real-world settings.
Methods Our study aimed to synthesize observational studies to assess the generalizability of CVOTs to real-world settings. We systematically reviewed observational studies that emulated previous CVOTs for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for observational studies that focused on trial emulation or cross-sectional studies that reported the proportion of real-world patients eligible for completed CVOTs. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study concordance with randomized controlled trial (RCT) results.
Results Nineteen studies were included in our systematic review, including four cohort studies that emulated previous RCTs and 15 cross-sectional studies that evaluated trial eligibility. Results between RCTs and real-world data (RWD) were concordant for all drug classes in finding non-inferiority. The median eligibility percentage ranged from 13% to 31% for SGLT-2 inhibitor trials and 12% to 43% for GLP-1 receptor agonist trials.
Conclusions These results suggest that, while RCTs and RWD are concordant in their estimates, the trials lack representativeness. More research is needed on the replication of CVOTs using RWD to understand how different replication methods may impact findings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
WW received funding from a Faculty of Medicine Internal Studentship and a CANadian Consortium of Clinical Trial TRAINing platform (CANTRAIN) studentship; CANTRAIN is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. KBF holds a William Dawson Scholar award from McGill University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest disclosure: None
Sources of Support: Dr. Filion is supported by a William Dawson Scholar award from McGill University. Wanning Wang is supported by a McGill Internal Studentship Award and a CANadian Consortium of Clinical Trial TRAINing platform (CANTRAIN) studentship; CANTRAIN is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
