Abstract
Background Different regions in Taiwan have varying levels of dengue risk; however, the same prevention messages were implemented nationwide for a prolonged period. People in areas with different risk levels may perceive the disease risk differently, and these perceptions may be linked to message fatigue. Individuals experiencing high levels of message fatigue may engage in fewer preventive activities. Although message fatigue has been studied concerning many infectious diseases, it has not been extensively researched in the context of dengue. Moreover, previous studies primarily focused on the general population regardless of risk level or on high-risk populations, with few examining message fatigue across areas with varying risk levels. Therefore, this study aimed to identify distinct predictors of message fatigue across different dengue-risk areas in Taiwan.
Methodology/Principal Findings The online questionnaire was adapted from the measurement developed by So et al., based on the conceptual definition of message fatigue. Message fatigue has two dimensions: message environment (ME) and audience response (AR). A negative binomial model was used to examine the association between the demographic variables (sex, residency, education, occupation, age, and income) and the perceived variables (perceived prevalence, perceived severity, and optimistic bias) with ME and AR separately.
The results showed that in high dengue-risk areas, individuals with an education level of high school or below reported significantly higher levels of AR compared to those educated higher than high school (1.10, 95% CI = 1.01–1.21). In medium dengue-risk areas, individuals in the optimism group were 1.12 times more likely (95% CI = 1.01– 1.25) to report higher levels of ME than those in the realistic group. In low dengue-risk areas, younger individuals, males, and those with a high-school education or below reported significantly higher levels of AR.
Conclusions/Significance This study revealed that dengue-message fatigue is associated with different variables across varying risk areas. These findings could inform global health communication strategies by identifying key demographic and perception-based predictors of message fatigue, enabling more targeted and effective public health messaging in regions with differing risk levels.
Author summary In Taiwan, dengue is a significant public health concern, and different regions face varying levels of risk. Despite these differences, the same public health messages about dengue prevention are disseminated nationwide. In this study, we explored how people in areas with high, medium, and low risk of dengue of Taiwan respond to these messages, specifically focusing on message fatigue—when individuals tire of repeated health messages and may stop following preventive advice. We found that individuals in high-risk areas with lower education levels reported more fatigue with these messages, while those in medium-risk areas who were optimistic about the disease were more likely to experience fatigue. In low-risk areas, younger individuals, males, and those with lower education levels were more likely to experience message fatigue. These findings can help global health authorities design better-targeted public health messages by considering how different groups respond to repeated health messaging, thereby making dengue prevention efforts more effective across various risk areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study utilized an online questionnaire that was previously reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of National Taiwan Normal University under approval number 202312HS019. As this study was conducted anonymously, no personal identifying information was collected through the online platform, ensuring participants' privacy and confidentiality. Participants were informed about the purpose of the research at the beginning of the online questionnaire, and their voluntary participation was implied by their completion of the survey. The study adhered to ethical principles for research involving human participants, particularly with respect to anonymity and the protection of data collected through online methods.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
