Abstract
Purpose Aphasia rehabilitation is a learning process that unfolds over time. Previous work has examined aphasia treatment response using pre- to post-treatment comparison, largely ignoring the unfolding learning response that occurs session-to-session. We aimed to: (1) characterize the shape of learning while individuals with aphasia received intensive anomia intervention, and (2) identify the cognitive predictors of this learning response.
Method Individuals (n=39) with chronic post-stroke aphasia received intensive semantic feature analysis (SFA). Naming accuracy for trained and semantically-related, untrained words was probed daily. We used Bayesian generalized linear mixed effects models to estimate the shape of learning during SFA treatment, and to measure the influence of key cognitive functions on treatment response.
Results Most treatment gains appeared early during treatment, after the first four hours of intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial memory were associated with the magnitude of those early treatment gains, favoring strong cognitive performers. Treatment generalization to untrained targets was present but modest, with some evidence suggesting that visuospatial recall performance may be associated with treatment generalization.
Conclusions Monitoring SFA treatment response early could help inform clinicians whether patients will respond optimally to intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial recall support learning during treatment, helping elucidate cognitive underpinnings of learning during aphasia rehabilitation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a VA Merit Review Rehabilitation and Research Development award.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of the Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Because of information security requirements associated with the project, direct data sharing will not be possible. However, we encourage individual investigators to contact us.
