Abstract
Background Person-centered Antenatal Care (PCANC) is a component of quality care that is essential to enable maximize health outcomes. It is believed to be one of the reasons why private health facilities have higher quality than public health facilities. However, in Ethiopia, there is a little study that assesses and compares the level of person-centered antenatal care among pregnant women in public and private health facilities.
Objectives To assess and compare the level of person-centered antenatal care among pregnant women attending antenatal care in public and private health facilities in the Western Hararghe zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia, 2020.
Methods An Institution Based Comparative Mixed Method Study Design was conducted among pregnant women in the Western Hararghe zone, Ethiopia from September 01-October 02, 2020. A multistage stage sampling technique was used to obtain 340 pregnant women (170 from public facilities and 170 from private facilities). The data were entered into Epi-data version 4.4 and analyzed using SPSS version 27. A comparison of categorical and continuous variables was done using an independent t-test and Chi-square test respectively. All comparisons were considered to be significant at a p-value of < 0.05. Qualitative data was analyzed by manually.
Results The overall PCANC percentage mean score was significantly higher in private health facilities (73.7%; 95% CI: 70.5–77.1%) compared to public facilities (59.7%; 95% CI: 56.05–63.5%) (P<0.001). Private facilities had higher percentage mean score than public ones in effective communication (71.4% vs. 56.3%), respect and dignity (85.2% vs. 71.2%), and supportive care (70.1% vs. 59.2%). Qualitative findings further highlighted better interpersonal communication in private facilities.
Conclusion This study highlights significant disparities in the PCANC between private and public health facilities, with private facilities better in effective communication, respect, dignity, and supportive care. Qualitative findings further underscore better interpersonal communication in private settings. Addressing the disparities in person-centered antenatal care between private and public health facilities is crucial to achieve equity and quality of antenatal care.
What is already known on this topic Person Centered Antenatal Care (PCANC) is critical for ensuring the quality maternal health services. However, disparities in the quality of care contribute to inequities in maternal health outcomes.
What this study adds This is the first study to assess and compare the level of PCANC in private and public health facilities in Ethiopia using the WHO Quality Framework on Maternal and Newborn Care.
The study reveals significant inequities in PCANC with private facilities scoring substantially higher in effective communication, respect and dignity, and supportive care compared to public facilities.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The findings emphasize the urgent need to address inequities in antenatal care by strengthening Person-Centered care in public health facilities. The findings highlight the need for targeted strategies that enhance communication, respect, and supportive care to ensure equitable and quality antenatal care. Policymakers and health system planners should leverage the WHO framework to implement targeted interventions aimed at improving equity and quality in maternal care services.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding and Disclaimer The study was financially supported by Samara University, the Department of Public Health, and the College of Medical and Health Science. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the supporting offices. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethical review committee of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences. The expedited approval of this study was received from the ethical review of committee Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with code 1504/2020. All the study participants were informed about the purpose of the study and finally, verbal consent was obtained before the interview. Respondents were informed about the purpose of the study, and their oral consent was obtained. The respondents right to refuse or withdraw from participating in the interview was fully maintained. Confidentiality and anonymity were ensured.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All supplementary information files are included in this manuscript.
