Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters in adult patients following administration of non-ionic intravenous contrast agents in computed tomography examinations in a tertiary hospital in Ghana

Data Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 was used for descriptive and inferential data analyses. Pearson and Spearman correlational statistics were performed to compare and establish associations and correlations between the experimental and control variable. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Patient demographics

The population consisted of equal numbers (n=64, 50.0%) of male and female patients with mean ages of 47.2±16.1 years and 46.6±15.9 years respectively (Table 1). The population mean age was 46.92 ± 15.94 years (range: 19 to 87 years). The majority of patients were aged 30 – 39 years (n=31, 24.2%) and fewer patients 70 years and over (n=12, 9.4%).

The male patients were generally taller (mean height= 171.78 ±7.78 cm; range:140 cm to 186 cm) than the female patients (mean height= 164.88 ± 6.86 cm; range=145 cm to 183 cm). On the contrary, the female patients were heavier (mean weight=71.30 ± 18.23 kg) and hence, had higher BMI (mean BMI= 27.27 ± 7.27 kg/cm²) than their male counterparts (mean weight=: 67.55 ±11.38 kg, mean BMI= 22.87 ±3.49 kg/cm²).

Hemodynamic Parameters

Fig. 2 shows the measured hemodynamic parameters of the patients. Among the male patients, the highest mean values for pulse rates (HR-B=82.4 bpm), systolic (SBP=130.6 mmHg), and diastolic (DBP=81.3 mmHg) blood pressures were found in age groups 60-69 years, 50-59 years, and above 70-years. Similarly, for the female patients, the highest mean pule rate of 83.0 bpm was recorded among female patients aged 19-29 years and 30-39-years, while the highest mean systolic (SBP=129.3mmHg), and diastolic (DBP=82.0 mmHg) blood pressures were found in patients aged 40-49 years.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Hemodynamic parameters

Distribution of CT Examination by Body Parts

The types of CT procedures performed on the case and control patients is shown in Table 2.

Head (n=81 63.3%), abdominopelvic (n=19, 14.8%), and chest (n=13, 10.2 %) CT procedures were most requested. The majority of the head CT examinations (n=58, 45.3%) were performed among the control patients, while abdominopelvic (n=17, 13.3%) and chest (n=13, 10.3%) were mostly done among the case patients. Thoracolumbar, right thigh, neck and chest, cervical spine, and cardiac angiogram were least requested for both case and control groups.

Contrast and Non-Contrast Enhanced CT Examinations

Contrast enhanced procedures were performed with either ultravist, omnipaque or iopamiro 370 non-ionic water-soluble ICA contrast media with pharmaco-kinetic characteristics of iopamidol 370 (Table 3). Out of the 64 CECT examinations, iopamiro ICA was used in 57 (89.1%) of the procedures. The volume (range: 40 ml to 100 ml) of injected ICA was based on the stature of the patients. Consequently, the mean contrast volumes administered to the female patients was marginally higher (68.75±17.55 ml) than in males (66.56 ±18.60 ml) due to their heavier weight and higher BMI as seen from Table 1.

The relationship between patients’ weight and volume of ICAs is presented in Fig. 3.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3: Relationship between weight and volume of contrast (p=0.115)

Patients with the minimum (W=35 kg) and maximum weights (W=135 kg) received 40ml and 60ml contrast media respectively. Patients who received the highest volume of contrast were mostly above 80 kg.

The distribution of patient indications for CECT examinations and patient history without contrast media are shown in Figs. 4 and 5 respectively. The majority of the patients referred for CECT examination presented with tumour (n=16, 25.0%), infection (n=16, 25.0%), and intracranial/space occupying lesion (IC/SOL) (n=9, 14.1%), while dyspnea, facial nerve palsy, deteriorating vision, ectopic kidney, hepatomegaly, bifascicular heart block, epilepsy were presented by 1 patient each. Headache (n=19, 29.7%), seizures (n=13, 20.3%), head injury (n=12, 18.8%), and CVA (n=6, 9.4%) were the most prevalent patient clinical histories.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4: Patient indication for contrast enhanced examination

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5: Distribution of patient history without contrast media

Inferential Statistics

The results of the comparison of hemodynamic values (case vrs. control groups) and effects of contrast media and demographics on blood pressure are presented in Tables 4 and 5 respectively.

The measured mean HR, SBP and DBP with and without ICA administration in the case and control groups were higher after CT scan. The differences were however, higher among the ICA-administered case group (HR: 2.7%; SBP: 6.1%; DBP:1.3%) compared to the control group (HR: 0.2%; SBP: 1.1%; DBP:0.6%). Statistically, there was a significant effect of the ICA on HR (p = 0.008), but insignificant on SBP (p = 0.716) and DBP (p = 0.533). For heart rate (HR), the F-value for the interaction before and after the CT scan is 2.996 with 1 df and a p-value of 0.086, while the F-value for the interaction between ICA and non-ICA groups is 7.336 with 1 df and a p-value of 0.008, indicating a statistically significant difference in HR due to ICA administration. Conversely, for systolic blood pressure (SBP), a high F-value of 15.523 with 1 df and a p-value of 0.000 signifies a highly significant difference before and after the CT scan but no significant difference between ICA and non-ICA groups, where the F-value is 0.133 with 1 df and a p-value of 0.716. In the case of diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both interactions have low F-values (0.171 and 0.391) with 1 df and relatively high p-values (0.680 and 0.533), indicating no significant differences in DBP. The patients were age-categorized as young adults (19 – 39 yrs), middle aged adults (40 – 59 yrs) and old adults (≥ 60 yrs) (Table 5). Higher mean HR was measured for the middle aged adults (87.76±14.56 bpm) compared to the young (83.15±14.42 bpm) and old adults (84.35±13.22 bpm). The same was observed for the DBP. However, the mean SBP increased with age among the various age groups. No significant differences were found between the various age groups and effect of contrast media (p > 0.05). The differences in the mean HR between the male and female patients after contrast media administration were statistically insignificant (p=0.749). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the SBP (p=0.325) and DBP (p=0.975) in both female and male groups after administration of contrast media.

Table 5 further shows that the HR for underweight patients was highest among the four BMI categories (82.72 bpm), while the highest SBP and DBP were recorded among the overweight (135.83 mmHg) and normal weight (82.00 mmHg) patients respectively. There was no significant difference in relation to mean values obtained between all the hemodynamic parameters and the various categories of BMI after contrast media administration.

The Pearson and Spearman correlations between hemodynamic parameters and demographics (age, BMI) are shown in Table 6. The Pearson statistics showed positive correlations between age and SBP (r = 0.390, p = 0.001), and between age and DBP (r=0.086, p=0.499) after contrast. The relationships between age and HR as well as age and DBP were however, insignificant. Similarly, a statistically insignificant and negative correlation was identified between the contrast volume and DBP, while the positive correlations between contrast volume and HR (r = 0.020, p = 0.877) and SBP (r=0.152, p=0.231) were statistically insignificant.

The HR and BMI correlated negatively (r_s=-0.041) after contrast, while a positive correlation and statistically significant association between SBP and BMI (r = 0.352, p=0.004) was established. The association between BMI and DBP (r = 0.748, p=0.134) was insignificant.

Demographic Characteristics

In case-control studies, it is necessary that every control group must consist of elements that exactly present the same features as the case group, except for applied interventions. In this regard, there were equal numbers of 64 patients in the case group who received ICA, and 64 patients in the control group who received no ICA. The wide age range of patients could be attributed to physician referrals of patients for other recommended imaging modalities other than CT in order to decrease the probability of carcinogenic risk following radiation exposure in the elderly.

Contrast and non-contrast enhanced examinations

Head and spine were the most and least referred anatomic sites for both CECT and non-contrast CT examinations. Other studies have also reported head and spine CT examinations as the most common and least performed CT examinations [16]. Headache (29.7%) was the most prevalent indication presented by the patients. Consistent with this, [17] also reported headache as the most common indication (48 %) presented for CT scan. This could be explained by the fact that head CT scans are more often referred for adult patients who present with headache to rule out suspected tumor or subarachnoid hemorrhage since headache is a common symptom of brain tumor. Predominance of head CT scan over other body parts may be related to the consideration of CT and MRI as gold standards for identification of problems pertaining to the central and peripheral nervous system [18]. Also, CT scan is known for its ability to produce non-superimposed cross-sectional images of different anatomic parts such as bones, blood vessels and soft tissues inside the human body within the shortest period of time. This makes it possible for detection tiny fractures in head injuries and other abnormalities [19].

Most often, non-contrast head CT remains the primary technique for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected stroke [20] This is important because it excludes intracerebral hemorrhage and lesions that might mimic CVA, like a tumor [21]. A study has shown that the detection of hemorrhage via non-contrast CT has the advantage of fast acquisition and wide availability [22].This accounts for the higher numbers of non-contrast head exams compared to CECT for head exams as the ACR guidelines, suggest that non-contrast head CT is sufficient to diagnose abnormalities which would eliminate, the unnecessary administration of intravenous contrast media [23].

CECT was requested for the main indications (Fig. 4) because it is useful for staging and identification of tumour size. Iopamidol 370 LOCA was mostly used (89.1%) compared with iohexol and iopromide (1.56%) because of the higher adverse effects associated with iohexol (0.82%) and iopromide (0.65%) as compared with iopamidol (0.29%) reported by [24].

Relationship between patients’ weight and volume of contrast

Body weight is the most important patient-related factor which impacts or influence the magnitude of vascular and parenchymal contrast media enhancement. Weight-based contrast administration protocols are therefore utilized in CECT modalities. This requires that higher contrast volumes are administered to heavier and larger patients due to their larger blood volumes. Consequently, administration of low volumes of ICA to heavy patients may result in image blurrness and compromised image quality. Repeat procedures resulting from poor or compromised image quality would further lead to increased patient radiation dose and elevated risk of biological damage, especially in the CT modality which is already associated with high patient radiation dose. It is therefore imperative that the correct volumes of ICAs are administered in CECT in order to avert these challenges.

In this study, the mean ICA volumes administered to female patients (68.75 ± 17.55 ml) was marginally higher because of their heavier weight and higher BMIs. [25] recommended administration of weight-related volumes of ICAs ranging from 30 ml (for pediatric patients), to 100 mls (for patients whose weight exceeded 120 kg). The lowest (40 ml for 35 kg patients) and highest (60 ml for 135 kg patients), as well as the mean contrast volumes applied in this study are within this range. The differences could be attributed to radiographers’ decisions regarding utilization of weight-based contrast administration protocols in CT imaging.

Hemodynamic parameters and patient demographics

The study showed differences in the variation of HR with age among the male and female patients. The observed decreasing HR with age among females in this study is consistent with the literature where [26] reported similar findings. According to [27] the higher levels of estrogen in pre-menopausal women could account for this trend.

This present study showed increases in SBP and DBP with age up to 40-49 yrs for female patients, and 50 - 59 yrs in male patients (Fig.1). In a previous [28] reported similar findings of continuous increases in SBP between the ages of 30 and 84 years or over. The observed variations of SBP and DBP with age could be attributed to changes in arterial and arteriolar stiffness, and to increased peripheral vascular resistance in small vessels.

Effect of contrast media on hemodynamic parameters

Post-contrast CT scans showed statistically significant increases in the patients’ HR. Other studies on post LOCM injection, and comparisons of the effects of iodixanol and ioxaglate during left ventriculography reported similar findings [12], [29]. The increases in HR could be attributed to the vasodilatory properties of contrast media and the effects of psychological factors resulting from heat sensation after contrast administration

Contrary to the findings of this study, [8] and [30] found no significant effects of iodixanol 320 and iomeprol 350 ICA on HR. According to [31] such inconsistencies could be explained by influences of physiochemical properties of contrast media, differences in volume of injected contrast, route of administration, radiographic procedures and study population on outcomes of hemodynamic parameters after contrast examination

This study found statistically significant differences in HR after contrast among patients who underwent CECT with non-ionic ICAs, while differences in the SBP and DBP were insignificant. The increase in SBP among the CECT patients (6.3%) was significantly higher compared to the almost negligible increase of SBP in control patients who received no contrast (0.3%). The increases in the DBP between the CECT and non-CECT examinations were also statistically insignificant. The findings of the current study are supported by [9] and [32] who reported no significant differences in terms of effects on arterial BP in in patients with coronary diseases after contrast administration or on LV pressures in patients undergoing contrast administration. In other studies, [8] found no effect of the contrast media on tissue temperature, SBP and DBP, or cardiac output per minute in patients who underwent CECT examination with iodixanol 320 and iomeprol 350, while [9] also reported insignificant effects of non-ionic LOCM on blood pressure in pheochromocytoma patients since there was no increase in plasma catecholamine levels.

On the contrary, [11]reported increases in SBP and DBP after administration of non-ionic ICA in patients, while [12] reported increases in SBP and DBP after using non-ionic (iohexol) contrast in assessing hemodynamic effects of contrast media in patients undergoing CECT examination. [33] reported a hypertensive crisis from a study in which non-LOCM caused an increase in pulmonary artery pressure during CT examination. In quantifying the effects on hemodynamic parameters and kidney function following intravenous administration of non-ionic LOCM with normal and low osmolality, [5] also observed a significant transient decrease in blood pressure following the administration of low-osmolar iopromide but not with iodixanol.

The observed discrepancies could be attributed to factors that influence outcome of hemodynamic parameters after contrast examination such as differences in volume of injected contrast, route of administration, physiochemical properties of contrast media, radiographic procedures and study population.

Correlation between anthropometric factors and hemodynamic parameters

Post-contrast SBP correlated positively with age and BMI (p=0.001, p=0.004) (Table 6) as similarly reported [34], [35]. The absence of any effects of contrast volume on SBP and DBP is supported [10] who found no correlation between doses of contrast material and its influence on hemodynamic parameters.

This study found no statistically significant differences between patient demographics (gender, BMI, and age) in terms of measured blood pressure and HR. This is consistent with previous studies which found no difference between the incidence of adverse reactions to contrast media and patient characteristics such as sex, gender, weight, flow amount and flow ratio [10].