Abstract
Patients recovering from hemiparetic stroke have been shown to benefit from mirror therapy in terms of improving their motor function. The clinical improvement in motor function may differ depending on the mirror therapy protocol used. Previous studies have shown that four parameters are influential: the size of the mirror (large and small), manipulation of objects (with or without), the complexity of action (simple and complex), and movement execution (unilateral and bilateral). We examined the impact of these parameters on the subjective quality (believability) of the mirror illusion in unimpaired participants. Forty healthy participants completed 16 different combinations of the four parameters during mirror visual feedback. Participants rated each trial for its level of believability on a 10-point Likert scale. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine the data. The large mirror consistently elicited higher ratings than the small mirror. And while bimanual movements generally elicited higher ratings than unimanual movements, ratings for bimanual movements were significantly reduced when participants made complex movements with objects. We attributed these results to the congruency of multisensory information. Conditions that elicit congruency between illusory information and other sensory inputs appear to maximise believability over the illusory hand. The findings of this study reveal the parameters maximising illusion believability in unimpaired participants and have implications for optimal mirror therapy conditions in patients’ groups.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the University of Birmingham’s Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Ethical Review Committee (ERN_15–1573).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Due to the sensitive nature of the data, information created during and/or analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author (Jin Min Kim/j.m.kim@bham.ac.uk) on reasonable request to bona fide researchers.
