Abstract
Background Early initiation of antenatal care provides timely screening, advice and support. Inequities in early care initiation exist in high income countries, but there is scant evidence on effective interventions. The Community REACH trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of co-produced place-based interventions to strengthen community support for early care initiation.
Methods Matched-pair cluster randomised trial in socially disadvantaged and ethnically diverse areas in England. Electoral wards with low rates of early care initiation were matched and randomly allocated to intervention or control (usual care) (n=10 pairs). Following a three month co-design phase, community organisations and volunteers in intervention sites conducted targeted outreach activities over six months. The primary outcome was initiation of antenatal care by the 12th completed week of pregnancy.
Results There was no evidence of a difference in the primary outcome (OR 1.07(0.89; 1.28)). There were also no statistically significant differences in rates of emergency caesarean, pre-term birth, low birth weight, smoking, or breastfeeding. There was a higher rate of care initiation by 10 weeks and fewer antenatal admissions in the intervention arm during the intervention period although differences were not sustained after it finished.
Conclusion This rigorous evaluation found limited impact of short-term place-based interventions to strengthen community support for early initiation of antenatal care. Future initiatives may benefit from embedding in integrated health and care structures to ensure sufficient time and resources for mobilisation of community assets and focusing on smaller ‘hyper-local’ neighbourhoods. Actions to tackle wider structural and organisational barriers are also needed.
Trial registration ISRCTN registry: registration number 63066975. Registered on 18 August 2015.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
Previous research in high income countries has identified inequalities in access to antenatal care, yet there is little evidence on interventions to improve early initiation of antenatal care.
Co-produced place-based interventions which develop and strengthen community support offer a promising approach to tackle health inequalities but this type of approach has not yet been rigorously tested in the context of early initiation of antenatal care in high income countries.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
It was possible to develop and implement a co-designed and co-delivered place-based six month intervention to increase early access to antenatal care in ethnically and linguistically diverse inner-city neighbourhoods.
There is no evidence that this short-term intervention increased the proportion of women accessing antenatal care before 12 completed weeks of pregnancy; initiation of care by 10 weeks increased significantly whilst the intervention was running, but this was not maintained after it ended.
Intervention implementation varied across sites in the extent to which it reflected the underpinning intervention logic of co-production and community development; there was, however, no evidence of an association between implementation and intervention effect estimates.
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY
Given the results of this study, funders and intervention developers of future initiatives to strengthen community support should ensure a longer lead in time so that interventions can be embedded within integrated health and care structures and allow sufficient time, resources and capability for co-production, the development of community relationships and asset-based ways of working.
Efforts to tackle inequalities in early initiation of antenatal care should also consider service-level actions such as geographical location, availability of interpreters and anti-racist practice training.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN63066975
Clinical Protocols
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2526-6
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-1211-20015). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Committee North East-York of the NHS Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (27 March 2015, ref.15/NE/0106).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
