Abstract
Introduction Actimetry is increasingly used to measure physical activity (PA) for MWC users. However, conversion of raw data into interpretable PA outcomes remains imprecise, and the differentiation between propulsion and non-propulsion is challenging. Using a previously developed two-part algorithm, the objectives of this study were to 1) measure the accuracy of total distance collected, and 2) validate the algorithm’s accuracy in differentiating between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.
Methods Experimental study consisting of two data collection sessions. Actimetry data (Actigraph) were collected indoors (controlled conditions) during 100 repetitions (n=40 MWC propulsion, n=60 pushing the MWC) over three distances (10, 50 and 100 meters). Actimetry data (Actigraph) were also collected outdoors (uncontrolled condition) during self-propulsion over 1,000 meters (10 repetitions). Descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, standard deviation) with confidence intervals and accuracy measures (percentage of true value) were conducted for each trial.
Results The algorithm measured total distance covered indoors with an excellent accuracy (98.9% to 99.8%). It differentiated between self-propulsion and non-propulsion with an accuracy between 96.2% and 99.2% under controlled condition, and between 91.3% and 100.0% under uncontrolled condition.
Conclusions The algorithm tested allowed precise measurement of total distance covered, as well as an excellent discrimination between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this study. Krista Best and Francois Routhier received salary support from the Quebec Heath Research Funds (Junior 2 and Senior Scholar respectively).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was exempted from ethical approval by the Research Ethics Board in rehabilitation and social integration of the Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (#2025-32390).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations
Conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding: No external funding was received for this study. Krista Best and Francois Routhier received salary support from the Quebec Heath Research Funds (Junior 2 and Senior Scholar respectively)
Ethics Approval: This study was exempted from ethical approval by the Research Ethics Board in rehabilitation and social integration of the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (#2025-32390).
Data Availability Statement: All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
