ABSTRACT
Health inequalities and inequities are shaped by intersecting factors and life-course experiences, yet current evidence synthesis methods often lack the depth to capture these dimensions. The Kunonga Framework was developed through a three-phase approach to address these gaps, enhancing methodologies to better focus on health inequality and inequity in research. In the first phase, a systematic review identified key gaps in current inequality/inequity considerations. The second phase involved expert Key Informant Interviews, refining the framework’s design. Finally, findings from both phases informed the proposed framework, offering practical recommendations for integrating inequality and inequity considerations across evidence synthesis processes. At the protocol stage, reviewers are advised to explicitly define health inequality and inequity, select frameworks like PROGRESS-Plus, and develop a logic model to map pathways between social determinants, life-course factors, and health outcomes. During data extraction, organising data by demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare factors is recommended to detect patterns of inequality and inequity. In analysis, an intersectionality matrix and life-course analysis will help reveal overlapping social determinants and cumulative effects on health outcomes. The Kunonga Framework offers a structured approach to embedding intersectional, life-course perspectives in evidence synthesis, supporting policymakers and researchers in designing more effective, inequality/inequity-focused interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research is funded through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Older People and Frailty (funding reference PR-PRU-1217-2150). As of 01.01.24, the unit has been renamed to the NIHR Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing (funding reference NIHR206119). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Given the nature of the study, which focused on gathering voluntary methodological insights from knowledgeable professionals rather than vulnerable populations or sensitive personal data, formal ethical review was deemed unnecessary.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Data availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information.
Co-author's name was corrected from Barbara Patience Hanratty to Barbara Hanratty. Co author does not have a middle name.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information.
