Abstract
Background The link between chronic exposure to ambient PM2.5 and lung cancer is well established. However, there is limited evidence on the effects of more acute, high-level exposure such as that resulting from the 2014 Hazelwood coal mine fire in regional Australia. We investigated the effects of PM2.5 from the mine fire on cancer incidence 8.5 years later.
Methodology We obtained Victorian Cancer Registry data linked to 2872 Hazelwood Health Study Adult Cohort members, for the period August 2014 to December 2022. Individual fire-related PM2.5 exposure was estimated by blending time-location diaries with spatial and temporal air pollution modelling data. To assess the cancer risk associated with fire related PM2.5 exposure, we employed competing risk regression models, accounting for people who died from causes other than cancer during follow-up and adjusting for confounders, including cigarette smoking.
Results In the post-mine fire period, 295 people (14.3/1000 person-years) were diagnosed with 332 new cancers (12.7/1000 person-years). No significant association was found between fire-related PM2.5 exposure and the overall incidence of cancer (HR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.90-1.11). Additionally, no associations were identified with any specific cancer subtypes, including lung cancer. However, a higher risk of overall cancer incidence was observed in Morwell compared with Sale, (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.93–1.73).
Conclusions While we found no evidence that this coal mine fire increased cancer incidence, it would be premature to rule out potential carcinogenic effects. Cancer has a long latency period, which means it will be necessary to analyse new data as they become available to more conclusively determine the effects of medium-duration, high-level smoke exposure.
Competing Interest Statement
M.J.A. also holds investigator-initiated grants from Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline for unrelated research. He has undertaken an unrelated consultancy for Sanofi and received a speaker's fee from GSK. The other authors declare no other competing interests.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Victorian Department of Health. The article presents the views of the authors and does not present the views of the Department.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study obtained ethics approval from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC).This research is part of the Hazelwood Adult Survey and Health Record Linkage Study. (Project ID: 25680; previously CF15/872-2015000389).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
In this revised version of the preprint, minor formatting errors in the abstract have been corrected to ensure clarity and consistency. No substantive changes have been made to the content of the manuscript
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
