Reassessing Asymmetry Reduction in Psychosis: Cingulate Folding and Gyrification Covariance in Patients with Auditory Hallucinations

Shun-Chin Jim Wu, Héloïse de Vareilles, Samantha C. Mitchell, Atheer Al-Manea, Jane Garrison, Michail Mamalakis, Jon S. Simons, Arnaud Cachia, Jean-François Mangin, Stener Nerland, Lynn Mørch-Johnsen, Ingrid Agartz, John Suckling, Graham K. Murray
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.24316889

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Prior research links a shorter paracingulate sulcus (PCS) to hallucinations in schizophrenia, but its symmetry hemispheric specificity and relevance to bipolar disorders remain unclear. We hypothesized that reduced PCS asymmetry and interhemispheric gyrification covariance in salience and auditory networks are associated with lifetime auditory hallucinations (AH) in psychotic spectrum disorders.

Study Design We compared patients with and without AH, and healthy controls, focusing on PCS asymmetry in five ordinal classes, sulcal length and depth, and interhemispheric gyrification covariance.

Study Results Among 351 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum disorders (SSD/BSD), 194 (55.3%) had AH, compared to 157 without and 278 healthy controls. We found no significant PCS class asymmetry between hemispheres (V = 6648.5, P = .097) and decreased leftward asymmetry in PCS length (F(2,626) = 3.19, P = .013) in patients with AH, compared with those without and healthy controls. Compared to patients without AH, those with AH showed increased gyrification covariance in the auditory network (F(2,625) = 42.5, P < .001). In the salience network, patients with SSD and AH had increased covariance (F(2,625) = 299, P < .001), while patients with BSD and AH displayed decreased covariance (F(2,625) = 102, P < .001).

Conclusions This study, featuring the largest cohort to date, links the AH trait to replicable reduced leftward PCS asymmetry and altered interhemispheric covariance in psychotic spectrum disorders, supporting theories of reduced asymmetry and altered brain network coordination as part of the mechanistic pathway to psychosis.

Introduction

Reduced brain asymmetry has been proposed as one of etiological hypotheses for psychosis1,2, supported by deviations in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula observed in both patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder compared to healthy individuals3–5. Although earlier studies were constrained by limited sample sizes, recent large-scale research has identified alternated brain asymmetry in schizophrenia, particularly in the cortical thickness of the rostral anterior cingulate and middle temporal gyrus, compared to heathy individuals6.

Cortical thickness and volume fluctuate significantly during maturation, but the topological measure like cortical folding around the anterior cingulate cortex, bordered by the paracingulate sulcus (PCS), is established prenatally and remains stable throughout life7. In addition, the cortical topology of the medial frontal cortex including the PCS has been associated with a liability to hallucinations in schizophrenia spectrum disorders8–11, and executive function and reality monitoring, psychological processes that may, when impaired, contribute to psychotic symptom pathogenesis12–14. The anterior cingulate cortex is consistently related to PCS, typically exhibiting rightward asymmetry in the ACC and leftward asymmetry in the PCS15–18. Therefore, the PCS may serve as a stable marker for susceptibility to hallucinations throughout life19–21.

However, since the presence and morphology of the PCS vary widely across individuals and hemispheres7, findings on laterality deviations are mixed. A shorter left PCS is often observed in psychotic disorders, particularly in those with hallucinations, but some studies report right sided or bilateral deviations8–11,22–28. Asymmetry measures may help reconcile these inconsistencies, as the extent of deviations in asymmetry have been linked to the severity or liability of psychotic symptoms5,11,29. Therefore, asymmetry of the medial frontal lobe has been suggested as a transdiagnostic biomarker for the psychosis continuum, indicating a shared risk feature across the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder spectrum1,3–5.

Topological measures can also be assessed through structural covariance, which reflects the coordination between brain regions or networks30–33. Many previous studies have relied on expert anatomical annotation of folding patterns; however, brain surface topology can also be quantified using measures such as local gyrification34. We have previously reported alterations in the covariance of gyrification indices both within and between regions in the salience and auditory networks, suggesting that perinatal alterations in developmental trajectories may be linked to the experience of hallucinations in early adulthood11. Given that asymmetry deviations influence cortical topology in both hemispheres, these effects may be evident in the interhemispheric structural covariance of gyrification in the PCS and related networks.

Inconsistent findings in this field may stem from several limitations in previous studies: modest sample sizes, focus only on schizophrenia spectrum disorders, single measurement method (either categorical or continuous), and a reliance on bilateral structural covariances, which are obscured by unilateral within-network covariance due to their close geodesic distance11,16,35. To overcome these limitations and explore the potential of PCS morphological asymmetry as a transdiagnostic biomarker for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders, this study aims to examine PCS asymmetry using both categorical and continuous methods. Additionally, it incorporates interhemispheric structural covariance analysis of gyrification in the PCS and extended salience and auditory networks, using a large cohort (N = 629) comprising patients with schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders, along with healthy controls.

Theoretically, we seek to provide improved evidence of topological coordination within the PCS and the salience and auditory networks in the early co-development of structures that implicate the risk for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, particularly regarding the hallucinations experience as a symptom of psychosis. These brain regions and networks are central to the theory of misattributed reality monitoring and/or inner speech as mechanisms for auditory hallucinations36. Our specific hypotheses are that patients with a history of lifetime auditory hallucinations (lifetime AH) exhibit decreased leftward asymmetry and interhemispheric covariance in the PCS, but increased covariance within and between the salience and auditory networks.

Methods

This study compared PCS asymmetry using a categorical rating scale and continuous metrics of sulcal morphology, alongside interhemispheric structural covariance of gyrification, between patients with and without lifetime AH among psychotic spectrum disorders, and healthy controls. Additionally, interhemispheric structural covariance within and between salience and auditory networks across these groups were investigated. The overall study design is outlined in Figure 1. To further discern potential differences between subgroups (schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar spectrum disorders), all analyses were also conducted within each subgroup (stratified analysis).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Overview of the Study.

This study examined patients with psychotic spectrum disorders (PSD), including schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD), who experience lifetime auditory hallucinations (N = 194), compared to those without auditory hallucinations (N = 157), as well as healthy controls (N = 278) from the Thematically Organized Psychosis study. We investigated paracingulate sulcus asymmetry using a categorical rating scale and continuous metrics, along with interhemispheric structural covariance in gyrification within and between salience and auditory networks.

Dataset

The study utilized structural T1-weighted MRI images obtained from the Thematically Organized Psychosis study conducted at the University of Oslo and the Oslo University Hospital, focusing on patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders37,38. Images were acquired using a 1.5 Tesla Siemens MAGNETOM Sonata scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a standard head coil. After obtaining a conventional 3-plane localizer, two sagittal T1-weighted volumes were acquired using the magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) technique with the Siemens tfl3d1_ns pulse sequence. The acquisition parameters were as follows: echo time (TE) = 3.93 ms, repetition time (TR) = 2730 ms, inversion time (TI) = 1000 ms, flip angle = 7°, field of view (FOV) = 24 cm, voxel size = 1.33×0.94×1 mm³, and 160 partitions. To enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, the two acquired MPRAGE volumes were first registered with the rigid-body registration and then averaged. Notably, there were no significant changes to the scanner or related instruments during the study’s image acquisition period.

In total, 629 participants were included, comprising 351 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), and 278 healthy controls. The presence or absence of lifetime auditory hallucinations in patients was determined using the item B16 from the SCID-IV. Patients were combined into a category termed psychotic spectrum disorders, with 194 patients with lifetime AH (55.3%) and 157 patients without (44.7%). Specifically, there were 194 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, categorized as follows: schizophrenia (N = 145), schizoaffective disorder (N = 28), and schizophreniform disorder (N = 21). Additionally, there were 157 patients with bipolar spectrum disorders, divided into bipolar I disorder (N = 98), bipolar II disorder (N = 50), and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (N = 9). Around 74.7% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 31.1% of patients with bipolar spectrum disorders reported lifetime AH. Demographic and clinical profiles are provided in Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1. Demographics and Clinical Information

Image preprocessing

To accurately delineate individual sulcus for visual classification and manual labelling, we employed 3-D visualization using BrainVISA. For precise calculation of regional gyrification, vertex-wise surface analysis was conducted with Freesurfer. Consistent with our previous research on hallucinatory behaviors in schizophrenia11, we chose to use the same two software tools to ensure methodological consistency.

  • BrainVISA: Due to the variability of the PCS, automatic labelling of the PCS is not implemented in BrainVISA’s Morphologist automatic sulcal recognition pipeline (version 5.0.4)39,40. Instead, visual rating and manual labelling of the PCS were performed for each participant’s hemispheres. Prior to rating and labelling, T1-weighted MR images underwent preprocessing using the Morphologist pipeline41, involving grey and white matter segmentation, mesh creation, and cortical folds graph generation. PCS categorization and labelling were independently conducted on the unlabeled cortical folds graph, without knowledge of the diagnosis or sulcal patterns in the opposite hemisphere. The PCS was visually classified based on its presence and morphology, particularly focusing on its length and width, in accordance with the Paracingulate Sulcus Classification Protocol developed by our colleagues42. The PCS was also manually labelled according to the Paracingulate Sulcus Labelling Protocol also developed by our colleagues43. Following this manual labelling, metrics including sulcal length and depth were automatically generated and extracted. Emphasizing sulcal length and depth aligns with previous literature presented in the introduction. Estimated intracranial volume and hemispheric brain volume were also derived by BrainVISA to be used as covariates in subsequent analysis.

  • Freesurfer: After preprocessing T1-weighted MR images with “recon-all-all” in Freesurfer (version 6.0.0), the local gyrification index (LGI), a quantitative measure representing the amount of embedded cortex within each cortical vertex, was calculated for gyrification. One healthy control subject was excluded from subsequent structural covariance analyses due to processing failure (resulting in N = 628). Interhemispheric structural covariance for the PCS, salience and auditory networks was established by resampling LGI maps from vertices to regions on the Human Connectome Project-MMP1.0 multimodal surface-based anatomical atlas44. Specifically, we focused on the PCS, incorporating indices within 24dd, 24dv, SCEF, p32pr, a32pr, d32, p32, 8BM, and 9m. Similarly, for the salience network, the regions FEF, 5mv, 23c, SCEF, 6ma, p24pr, 33pr, a24pr, p32pr, 6r, 46, 9-46d, 43, PFcm, PoI2, FOP4, MI, AVI, AAIC, FOP1, FOP3, FOP2, PFop, PF, PoI1, FOP5, and a32pr were included. The auditory network comprised the regions A1, PSL, STV, OP4, OP1, OP2-3, 52, RI, TA2, STGa, PBelt, A5, STSda, STSdp, STSvp, TPOJ1, Ig, MBelt, LBelt, A4, and STSva. Lastly, estimated intracranial volume was also calculated by Freesurfer to be used as a covariate in subsequent analyses of structural covariances in gyrification.

Paracingulate sulcus asymmetry

  1. Categorical rating scale: To classify the PCS more precisely than the classical three-class system45, the PCS on the unlabeled cortical folds graph was visually rated into five ordinal classes based on the following criteria (see Figure 2):

    • Class 1: a complete absence of folding, with minimal or no sulcal elements observed dorsal to the cingulate sulcus, or the presence of folding dorsal to the cingulate sulcus that do not parallel the cingulate sulcus.

    • Class 2: the presence of sparse sulcal paralleling to the cingulate sulcus but failing to globally outline a complete PCS. The gaps between sulcal elements are more noticeable than the sulcal elements themselves.

    • Class 3: an interrupted PCS, where sulcal elements outline a complete PCS but with missing portions or limited spatial extension. The elements of the potential full PCS are more noticeable than the gaps between the elements.

    • Class 4: a full-length PCS extending from the extension of the genu of the corpus callosum to the vertical anterior commissure line, shallower than the cingulate.

    • Class 5: an almost cingulate-like PCS, which is deep and continuous and could be mistaken for the cingulate sulcus

    To examine the asymmetry of the PCS classes, the presence of asymmetry between bilateral PCS classes (left PCS class vs. right PCS class) within each group was initially assessed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-sided) was applied to compare left and right PCS classes pairwise within each group, using the stats package (version 3.6.2) in R (version 4.2.3). Asymmetry was considered absent if the null hypothesis of no significant difference between left and right PCS classes was not rejected, indicated by a p-value of 0.05 or higher.

    Figure 2.
    Figure 2. Paracingulate Sulcus Categorical Rating Scale.

    The paracingulate sulcus, highlighted in light green, can be visually classified into five ordinal classes using the BrainVisa software. The rating scale ranges from no visible sulcus or only elements not parallel to the cingulate sulcus (class 1) to a sparse sulcus with prominent gaps (class 2), an interrupted sulcus (class 3), a full-length sulcus (class 4), and finally, a sulcus paralleling and resembling the cingulate sulcus (in dark blue) with similar depth (class 5).

    If asymmetry was absent in any group, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to compare the differences between bilateral PCS classes (left minus right PCS class) across groups. This test was conducted with the rstatix package (version 0.7.2), assuming that the differences between paired ordinal variables by subtraction are ordinal.

  2. Continuous metrics: With automatically generated metrics including length and average depth of the PCS in native space, the asymmetry of metrics in the PCS was evaluated by the asymmetry difference (Left − Right) instead of the asymmetry index ((Left − Right) / (Left + Right)), as adopted by our previous work 11. This decision aimed to avoid inaccuracies in asymmetry measurement, particularly for cases of unilateral appearance of the PCS, which are not uncommon. The classic asymmetry index may obscure the significance of differences, especially when one side of the metrics is zero, potentially masking variations between large and minimal asymmetry values (e.g., 10 vs. 0.1 mm).

    For group comparisons, one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with 5000 permutations was conducted using the permuco package (version 1.1.1) in R. This analysis was controlled for multiple covariates, including age, sex, estimated intracranial volume from BrainVISA, brain volume difference (Left − Right brain volume), the sum of metrics (Left + Right metrics), and broad diagnosis group (schizophrenia spectrum disorders or bipolar spectrum disorders). These covariates were included to mitigate regional asymmetry in the PCS driven by aging, sex difference, head size, global hemispheric asymmetry, total metrics scale, or subgroup diagnosis, respectively46,47. If significant differences were found in one-way ANCOVA, post-hoc Tukey Honest Significant Difference (HSD) tests for pairwise comparisons were performed using lmPerm (version 2.1.0) and multcomp packages (version 1.4-25) in R. Additionally, since sexual differences are crucial to Dr. Crow’s reduced asymmetry hypothesis3, the effect of the interaction between the lifetime AH and sex on the asymmetry of PCS metrics was also assessed.

Interhemispheric structural covariance of local gyrification indices

  1. Paracingulate sulcus: To assess the interhemispheric coordination of the PCS, we computed the interhemispheric structural covariance of LGIs between bilateral PCS regions. This analysis was conducted using partial correlation with Pearson correlations, adjusting for age, sex, estimated intracranial volumes from Freesurfer, and broad diagnosis group (schizophrenia spectrum disorders or bipolar spectrum disorders) with the ppcor package (version 1.1) in R. Subsequently, we retained only significant correlation coefficients that survived after multiple testing corrections with false discovery rate (FDR) for subsequent group comparisons. Group comparisons were then performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 5000 permutations via the permuco package in R. If a significant difference was observed in one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey HSD tests for pairwise comparisons (two-sided) were conducted using the lmPerm and multcomp packages in R. Lastly, the estimated intracranial volumes calculated by BrainVisa and Freesurfer showed high consistency (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.951). However, we opted to use the respective values from each tool for greater precision.

  2. Salience and auditory networks: To explore the interhemispheric coordination within and between salience and auditory networks, we repeated the interhemispheric structural covariance analysis between bilateral salience, auditory, and a combined network encompassing both salience and auditory networks (i.e., the left salience and auditory networks correlated with the right salience and auditory networks). This analysis was carried out using the same aforementioned methods to compare groups.

Sensitivity analysis

To ensure the comparability with previous studies and the robustness the findings, the sensitivity analysis was conducted as follows:

  1. Using asymmetry index of metrics for PCS: To align with our prior research11, the asymmetry index for PCS metrics was still estimated.

  2. Adding antipsychotics defined daily dose48 or the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive scores as an additional covariate: To ensure stability and specificity of findings for auditory hallucination trait, independent of general psychosis status 49, the PCS metrics asymmetry analyses were controlled for antipsychotics dose or PANSS positive scores.

  3. Examining unilateral PCS rating scale and metrics: To facilitate direct comparisons with existing studies used either unilateral categorical rating scales or continuous metrics of the PCS8–11,22–28,50 and validate the consistency of the findings, group comparisons with these unilateral rating scales and metrics were also performed.

Results

Reduced leftward PCS asymmetry in patients with auditory hallucinations

Categorical analysis (PCS class) of asymmetry

When analyzing the PCS classes, a loss of PCS class asymmetry was observed only in patients with psychotic spectrum disorders and lifetime AH, indicated by the absence of a significant difference between bilateral PCS classes (V = 6648.5, Z = 0.12, P = .097). In contrast, PCS class asymmetry remained intact in patients without lifetime AH and in healthy controls (V = 13471 and 4610.5, Z = 0.23 and 0.19, P = .004 and .005). Subgroup analysis suggested that patients within the bipolar spectrum disorders showed a pronounced loss of PCS class asymmetry (V = 332, Z= 0.12, P = .414). However, between-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant difference in PCS class asymmetry (see Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2. Paracingulate Sulcus (PCS) Rating Scale: Within-Group Hemispheric Comparison and Between-Group Class Difference Comparison

Continuous analysis (PCS length) of asymmetry

A significantly decreased leftward asymmetry in PCS length was observed in patients with psychotic spectrum disorders and lifetime AH (F(2,626) = 3.19, P = .013 in length). In the post-hoc analysis, compared to patients without a history of auditory hallucinations, those with such a history showed a reduction in PCS length asymmetry by −10.97 mm (Z = −2.53, SE = 4.33, P = .028). Subgroup analysis of PCS length asymmetry indicated that patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and lifetime AH exhibited a pronounced shift from leftward to rightward asymmetry, with a transition from a positive to a negative mean asymmetry difference of −4.0 mm. This reduction in PCS length asymmetry in patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and a history of auditory hallucinations was statistically significant compared to healthy controls (−13.67 mm, Z = −2.38, SE = 5.76, P = .045) but not when compared to patients without such a history (−11.64 mm, Z = −1.83, SE = 6.35, P = .154). Among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, no statistically significant difference in PCS length asymmetry was found across the three groups. There was no statistically significant difference in PCS depth asymmetry between the three groups. Summarized results from the PCS metrics asymmetry are depicted in Figure 3A and Table S1. No significant interaction effect was observed between the lifetime AH and sex on the PCS length or depth asymmetry.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Decreased Leftward Asymmetry and Interhemispheric Covariance in the Paracingulate Sulcus in Patients with Lifetime Auditory Hallucinations.

(A) Patients with psychotic spectrum disorders and lifetime auditory hallucinations (PSD with H) exhibited significantly reduced leftward asymmetry in the length of the paracingulate sulcus compared to those without auditory hallucinations (PSD with NH), as indicated by the asymmetry difference (right-left or R − L), assessed using one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with 5000 permutations (F(2,626) = 3.19, P = .013). Posthoc testing revealed a mean difference in asymmetry of −10.97 mm (SE = 4.33, P = .028). In subgroup analyses, patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and auditory hallucinations (BSD with H) displayed an even more pronounced reduction in leftward asymmetry, indicated by a shift toward rightward asymmetry. (B) Interhemispheric covariance of local gyrification indices between bilateral paracingulate sulcus areas was calculated through partial correlations and compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 5000 permutations and posthoc tests. Although the reduction in covariance of patients with auditory hallucinations (PSD with H) was borderline (P = .05), subgroup analysis revealed significantly decreased covariance in patients with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD with H) (F (2,625) = 3.19, P = .013), consistent with findings from asymmetry analyses. Note: Asterisks (*) denote statistical significance levels of the posthoc Turkey HSD test after one-way ANCOVA or ANOVA with 5000 permutations (*P < .05, **P ≤ .01, ***P ≤ .001). Psychotic spectrum disorders (PSD) encompass schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD). Patients have either experienced auditory hallucination during their lifetime (H) or have not (NH). Healthy controls are denoted as (Control). Covariates include sex, age, estimated total intracranial volume, the difference between bilateral brain volumes (Left brain volume − Right brain volume), the sum of bilateral metrics (Left + Right), and broad diagnostic groups (SSD, BSD, or Control) for PSD comparisons.

The asymmetry in PCS length, as measured by the classical asymmetry index, showed consistent group differences, with F(2,626) = 5.06 and P = .002 (see Figure S2). When additional covariates, such as antipsychotic dose or PANSS positive scores, were included in the analysis, they did not change the observed reduction in PCS length asymmetry among patients with lifetime AH compared to those without (post-hoc test: M = −11.1 and −10.2 mms, Z = −2.54 and −2.36, SE = 4.40 and 4.34, P = .011 and .018).

Unilateral Analysis

In the unilateral analyses, no significant group differences were observed in either the unilateral rating scale or PCS length or depth metrics (see Figure S2 and Table S1).

Interhemispheric covariance of PCS in patients with auditory hallucinations

To further examine sulcal pattern coordination, we calculated the interhemispheric covariance of LGIs between bilateral PCS areas, compared with healthy controls and patients with lifetime AH, patients without such history demonstrated the strongest covariances (F (2,625) = 8.38, P < .001). In the subgroup analysis, an increased covariance in both patient subgroups compared to controls were found, only patients with the bipolar spectrum and lifetime AH displayed significantly decreased covariance (F (2,625) = 19.7, P < .001; post-hoc test, M = −0.18, Z = −6.16, SE = 0.03, P < .001). Summarized results from interhemispheric covariance in PCS are depicted in Figure 3B and Table S2.

Changes in interhemispheric covariance within and between salience and auditory networks

As in the PCS regions, patients exhibited significantly increased covariance between bilateral salience networks consistent in the overall group and subgroups (F (2,625) = 102 to 299, P < .001). In addition, the presence of lifetime AH influenced covariance differently across patient subgroups (see Figure 4A). Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and lifetime AH showed increased covariance compared to those without hallucinations (post-hoc test, M = 0.12 mm, Z = 17.3, SE = 0.01, P < .001), while patients within the bipolar spectrum disorders and lifetime AH displayed decreased covariance compared to patients without hallucinations (post-hoc test, M = −0.03, Z = −4.82, SE = 0.01, P < .001). Within bilateral auditory networks (see Figure 4B), patients with lifetime AH exhibited increased covariance compared to those without lifetime AH consistent in the overall group and subgroups (F (2,625) = 23.5 to 42.5, P < .001). Post-hoc tests indicated mean differences ranging from 0.03 to 0.06 (Z = 1.23 to 13.5, SE = 0.01, all P < .003). Similar trends were observed between the bilateral salience-auditory networks as those seen in the bilateral salience networks shown above (see Figure 4C). Detailed results from interhemispheric covariance within and between salience and auditory networks are provided in Table S2.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Disrupted Interhemispheric Structural Covariance of Local Gyrification Indices (LGIs) within and between Salience and Auditory Networks.

(A) Patients with lifetime auditory hallucinations (PSD with H) exhibited increased interhemispheric covariance in the salience network compared to those without hallucinations (PSD with NH), while patients with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD with H) showed decreased covariance (M = −0.03, SE = 0.01, P < .001). (B) Patients with auditory hallucinations (PSD with H) consistently showed increased covariance in the auditory network (F (2,625) = 23.5 to 42.5, P < .001). (C) Similar to the salience network, patients with auditory hallucinations (PSD with H) demonstrated increased covariance between the salience and auditory networks, while patients with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD with H) exhibited decreased covariance (M = −0.02, SE = 0.003, P < .001). Note: Asterisks (*) indicate statistical significance levels of posthoc Tukey HSD tests after one-way ANOVA with 5000 permutations (*P < .05, **P ≤ .01, ***P ≤ .001). Psychotic spectrum disorders (PSD) encompass schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD). Patients have either experienced auditory hallucination during their lifetime (H) or have not (NH). Healthy controls are denoted as (Control). Covariates include sex, age, estimated total intracranial volume, and broad diagnostic groups (SSD, BSD, or Control) for PSD comparisons.

Discussion

The study examined PCS topological coordination in patients with psychosis, using the largest sample size to date and expanding the scope of previous research by including affective and nonaffective psychosis in the analysis and using the interhemispheric structural covariance without unilateral within-network covariance. Aligning with our hypothesis and previous studies, we observed a loss of PCS class asymmetry, replicated the decreased leftward PCS length asymmetry, and identified increased structural covariance of gyrification within and between the salience and auditory networks in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and lifetime AH than those without 5,11,50,51. Similarly, this reduced leftward PCS asymmetry extended to the patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and lifetime AH. However, there were no group differences in unilateral PCS class or metrics, and no interaction effect of lifetime AH and sex on PCS asymmetry. Despite consistent increased interhemispheric covariance in the auditory network among patients with lifetime AH than those without, we observed opposing changes within the salience network between patients with and without lifetime AH, suggesting nuanced differences in sulcal pattern coordination across the spectrum diagnoses.

Consistent reduction in leftward asymmetry of PCS length across the psychosis spectrum with non-replicable unilateral findings

We observed a decrease in leftward asymmetry in the length of the PCS in patients with psychotic spectrum disorders and lifetime AH. This reduction was consistent across schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders, with a pronounced effect in bipolar spectrum disorders, where a shift to rightward asymmetry was observed. Similar results were obtained using other two methods. The categorical rating scale detected the absence of asymmetry in patients with lifetime AH compared to those without lifetime AH and healthy controls, with a significant impact in bipolar spectrum disorders. However, this categorical method did not detect differences between groups, possibly due to its lower sensitivity compared to continuous approaches or potential bias from directly subtracting ordinal variables. Additionally, we identified a significant decrease in the interhemispheric covariance of gyrification between bilateral PCS areas in patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and lifetime AH, compared with those without lifetime AH and healthy controls, not in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

However, we did not replicate any between-group differences in unilateral PCS measures8–11,22–26, whether using the categorical (Figure S1) or continuous approaches (Table S1). Several factors may contribute to this lack of replication. First, there are inconsistencies in the definition of hallucination across studies, including distinction between trait versus status, auditory versus general hallucinations, and hallucinatory perception versus behaviors. In this study, as in some studies8–10, we used the presence of lifetime AH from the SCID-IV, focusing on the auditory hallucinatory perception trait. In contrast, other studies often used the item P3 of the PANSS score, which reflects the general hallucinatory behaviors status11, or the auditory hallucinations severity22. Second, even when studies use similar definitions, studies focusing on the cingulate folding often have modest sample sizes or use different measurement tools52. Third, research cohorts might not be comparable, for example, our study and others focused on chronic or mixed-status patients9,10,22,23,26, while some studies emphasized first-episode psychosis11,24,25. How anatomical variations in the medial frontal lobe contribute to the liability for hallucinations remains unclear, though it is plausible that these variations influence brain network function, which may mediate this effect.

Support the deceased asymmetry hypothesis without significant effect of sex

While our findings partially support the reduced asymmetry hypothesis in psychosis2,3, there are notable differences from the original hypothesis. First, unlike Dr. Crow comparing patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder to healthy controls, we compared patients with and without psychotic symptoms. Second, we found no significant interaction between sex and lifetime AH on PCS asymmetry metrics, which contrasts with the original hypothesis that posits a significant role for sex differences. While male patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (particularly bipolar I) may have an earlier onset age than female patients53,54, there is no strong evidence of a sex difference in the onset age of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia55, and data for bipolar disorders are limited56. Thus, we propose a revised hypothesis: reduced asymmetry across psychotic spectrum disorders, at least in the medial frontal lobe, is specifically related to auditory hallucinations, irrespective of sex differences. However, this revised hypothesis requires further rigorous testing and refinement in future research.

Consistent interhemispheric structural covariance in auditory network, yet divergent patterns in salience network

Compared with patients without lifetime AH, patients with schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders exhibited similar interhemispheric structural covariance patterns in auditory networks. However, contrasting patterns in salience networks and between auditory and salience networks were observed. This finding in the auditory network aligns with previous studies from the same cohort, which identified deviations of cortical thickness in the Heschl’s gyrus within the auditory network shared by patients with schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum and lifetime AH compared to those without such lifetime AH37,38. Additionally, a similar pattern was seen in high-risk patients transitioning to psychosis30. This increased covariance may relate to heightened temporal hyperactivation, which is critical for auditory hallucinations57. However, when examining structural covariance in the salience networks and between salience and auditory networks, we found divergent effects between two disorders. Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and lifetime AH demonstrated increased covariance than those without lifetime AH, while patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and lifetime AH exhibited decreased covariance than those without lifetime AH, possibly linked to the hypoactivity in the salience network58,59. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between structural covariance in cortical patterns and functional connectivity.

Recommendations

Moving forward, several recommendations for future asymmetry studies emerge. First, while our study focused on PCS asymmetry for the auditory hallucination trait, exploring other morphometric markers for psychosis status, such as asymmetry in surface area, could offer valuable insights. Second, conducting a comprehensive analysis of whole-brain structural asymmetry, encompassing subcortical structures, through both region-based and vertex-wise approaches, is pivotal for a more profound comprehension of the psychosis continuum. Third, considering the importance of cytoskeleton-related genes in brain lateralization among nonclinical populations60, investigating whether these genes exert influence across the psychosis continuum is imperative. Last, examining brain lateralization in high-risk subclinical adolescents with distressing psychotic-like experiences61 can yield valuable insights into the neurodevelopmental trajectory of the full psychosis continuum model.

Conclusions and implications

This study, featuring the largest cohort to date investigating cingulate folding, supports the hypothesis of reduced asymmetry within the psychosis continuum. We observed consistent reduction in leftward asymmetry in the PCS among patients with psychotic spectrum disorders and lifetime AH, suggesting that the PCS morphology is transdiagnostically linked to the auditory hallucination trait. Rather than applying this theory to specific disorders, we propose that focusing on symptoms may be key to generalizing this hypothesis. Additionally, our findings highlight the importance of interhemispheric cortical coordination in the psychosis continuum, while acknowledging the complexities in specific sulcal patterns across different psychopathologies.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available to Lynn Morch-Johnsen and Ingrid Agartz upon reasonable request.

Disclosures

IA has received speaker’s honoraria from Lundbeck. GKM consults for ieso Digital Health. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Some contents of this manuscript were presented at the 2024 Congress of the Schizophrenia International Research Society.

Funding

This research was supported by the UK Medical Research Council MR/W020025 and the Research Council of Norway. All research at the Department of Psychiatry in the University of Cambridge is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312) and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the Thematically Organized Psychosis Study group and all participants in this study, without whom this work would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Professor Paul Fletcher and Professor Peter Jones for their advice.

Footnotes

  • The title has been updated.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Crow TJ. A continuum of psychosis, one human gene, and not much else--the case for homogeneity. Schizophr Res. Oct 1995;17(2):135–45. doi:10.1016/0920-9964(95)00059-u
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Crow TJ, Chance SA, Priddle TH, Radua J, James AC. Laterality interacts with sex across the schizophrenia/bipolarity continuum: an interpretation of meta-analyses of structural MRI. Psychiatry Res. Dec 30 2013;210(3):1232–44. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Crow TJ. The XY gene hypothesis of psychosis: origins and current status. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Dec 2013;162b(8):800–24. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32202
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.
    Bilder RM, Wu H, Bogerts B, et al. Cerebral volume asymmetries in schizophrenia and mood disorders: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Psychophysiol. Dec 1999;34(3):197–205. doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00077-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Koo MS, Levitt JJ, Salisbury DF, Nakamura M, Shenton ME, McCarley RW. A cross-sectional and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of cingulate gyrus gray matter volume abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia and first-episode affective psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Jul 2008;65(7):746–60. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.7.746
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Schijven D, Postema MC, Fukunaga M, et al. Large-scale analysis of structural brain asymmetries in schizophrenia via the ENIGMA consortium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr 4 2023;120(14):e2213880120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2213880120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Cachia A, Borst G, Tissier C, et al. Longitudinal stability of the folding pattern of the anterior cingulate cortex during development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. Jun 2016;19:122–7. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.02.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Garrison JR, Fernyhough C, McCarthy-Jones S, Simons JS, Sommer IEC. Paracingulate Sulcus Morphology and Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups. Schizophr Bull. Jun 18 2019;45(4):733–741. doi:10.1093/schbul/sby157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Garrison JR, Fernyhough C, McCarthy-Jones S, Haggard M, Simons JS. Paracingulate sulcus morphology is associated with hallucinations in the human brain. Nat Commun. Nov 17 2015;6:8956. doi:10.1038/ncomms9956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Ćurčić-Blake B, de Vries A, Renken RJ, et al. Paracingulate Sulcus Length and Cortical Thickness in Schizophrenia Patients With and Without a Lifetime History of Auditory Hallucinations. Schizophr Bull. Feb 24 2023;49(Supplement_1):S48–s57. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Rollins CPE, Garrison JR, Arribas M, et al. Evidence in cortical folding patterns for prenatal predispositions to hallucinations in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. Nov 6 2020;10(1):387. doi:10.1038/s41398-020-01075-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Buda M, Fornito A, Bergström ZM, Simons JS. A specific brain structural basis for individual differences in reality monitoring. J Neurosci. Oct 5 2011;31(40):14308–13. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3595-11.2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.
    Fornito A, Wood SJ, Whittle S, et al. Variability of the paracingulate sulcus and morphometry of the medial frontal cortex: associations with cortical thickness, surface area, volume, and sulcal depth. Hum Brain Mapp. Feb 2008;29(2):222–36. doi:10.1002/hbm.20381
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Tissier C, Linzarini A, Allaire-Duquette G, et al. Sulcal Polymorphisms of the IFC and ACC Contribute to Inhibitory Control Variability in Children and Adults. eNeuro. Jan-Feb 2018;5(1)doi:10.1523/eneuro.0197-17.2018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Fornito A, Whittle S, Wood SJ, Velakoulis D, Pantelis C, Yücel M. The influence of sulcal variability on morphometry of the human anterior cingulate and paracingulate cortex. Neuroimage. Nov 15 2006;33(3):843–54. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Roe JM, Vidal-Pineiro D, Amlien IK, et al. Tracing the development and lifespan change of population-level structural asymmetry in the cerebral cortex. Elife. Jun 19 2023;12doi:10.7554/eLife.84685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    Huster RJ, Westerhausen R, Kreuder F, Schweiger E, Wittling W. Morphologic asymmetry of the human anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage. Feb 1 2007;34(3):888–95. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Amiez C, Sallet J, Hopkins WD, et al. Sulcal organization in the medial frontal cortex provides insights into primate brain evolution. Nat Commun. Jul 31 2019;10(1):3437. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11347-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Maitra R, Horne CM, O’Daly O, Papanastasiou E, Gaser C. Psychotic Like Experiences in Healthy Adolescents are Underpinned by Lower Fronto-Temporal Cortical Gyrification: a Study from the IMAGEN Consortium. Schizophr Bull. Mar 15 2023;49(2):309–318. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac132
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Kim SY, Liu M, Hong SJ, et al. Disruption and Compensation of Sulcation-based Covariance Networks in Neonatal Brain Growth after Perinatal Injury. Cereb Cortex. Nov 3 2020;30(12):6238–6253. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Li G, Wang L, Shi F, et al. Mapping longitudinal development of local cortical gyrification in infants from birth to 2 years of age. J Neurosci. Mar 19 2014;34(12):4228–38. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3976-13.2014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Perret M, Lavallé L, Haesebaert F, Suaud-Chagny MF, Brunelin J, Mondino M. Neuroanatomical correlates of reality monitoring in patients with schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations. Eur Psychiatry. Sep 22 2021;64(1):e58. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Rametti G, Junqué C, Bartrés-Faz D, et al. Anterior cingulate and paracingulate sulci morphology in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. Aug 2010;121(1-3):66–74. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Lahutsina A, Spaniel F, Mrzilkova J, et al. Morphology of Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Its Relation to Schizophrenia. J Clin Med. Dec 21 2022;12(1)doi:10.3390/jcm12010033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Fornito A, Yücel M, Wood SJ, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex abnormalities associated with a first psychotic episode in bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. May 2009;194(5):426–33. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.049205
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Fornito A, Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, et al. Anatomical abnormalities of the anterior cingulate and paracingulate cortex in patients with bipolar I disorder. Psychiatry Res. Feb 28 2008;162(2):123–32. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.06.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Hibar DP, Westlye LT, Doan NT, et al. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Mol Psychiatry. Apr 2018;23(4):932–942. doi:10.1038/mp.2017.73
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Rimol LM, Hartberg CB, Nesvåg R, et al. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. Jul 1 2010;68(1):41–50. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Clark GM, Mackay CE, Davidson ME, et al. Paracingulate sulcus asymmetry; sex difference, correlation with semantic fluency and change over time in adolescent onset psychosis. Psychiatry Res. Oct 30 2010;184(1):10–5. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.06.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Heinze K, Reniers RL, Nelson B, et al. Discrete alterations of brain network structural covariance in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Biol Psychiatry. Jun 1 2015;77(11):989–96. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    Pizzagalli F, Auzias G, Yang Q, et al. The reliability and heritability of cortical folds and their genetic correlations across hemispheres. Commun Biol. Sep 15 2020;3(1):510. doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01163-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    Das T, Borgwardt S, Hauke DJ, et al. Disorganized Gyrification Network Properties During the Transition to Psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry. Jun 1 2018;75(6):613–622. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0391
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Yun JY, Kim SN, Lee TY, Chon MW, Kwon JS. Individualized covariance profile of cortical morphology for auditory hallucinations in first-episode psychosis. Hum Brain Mapp. Mar 2016;37(3):1051–65. doi:10.1002/hbm.23083
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Schaer M, Cuadra MB, Tamarit L, Lazeyras F, Eliez S, Thiran JP. A surface-based approach to quantify local cortical gyrification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. Feb 2008;27(2):161–70. doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.903576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Zhang X, Liu W, Guo F, et al. Disrupted structural covariance network in first episode schizophrenia patients: Evidence from a large sample MRI-based morphometric study. Schizophr Res. Oct 2020;224:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Simons JS, Garrison JR, Johnson MK. Brain Mechanisms of Reality Monitoring. Trends Cogn Sci. Jun 2017;21(6):462–473. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Mørch-Johnsen L, Nesvåg R, Jørgensen KN, et al. Auditory Cortex Characteristics in Schizophrenia: Associations With Auditory Hallucinations. Schizophr Bull. Jan 2017;43(1):75–83. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Mørch-Johnsen L, Nerland S, Jørgensen KN, et al. Cortical thickness abnormalities in bipolar disorder patients with a lifetime history of auditory hallucinations. Bipolar Disord. Nov 2018;20(7):647–657. doi:10.1111/bdi.12627
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    Borne L, Rivière D, Mancip M, Mangin JF. Automatic labeling of cortical sulci using patch- or CNN-based segmentation techniques combined with bottom-up geometric constraints. Med Image Anal. May 2020;62:101651. doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Rivière D, Leprince Y, Labra N, et al. Browsing Multiple Subjects When the Atlas Adaptation Cannot Be Achieved via a Warping Strategy. Front Neuroinform. 2022;16:803934. doi:10.3389/fninf.2022.803934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Mangin JF, Rivière D, Cachia A, et al. A framework to study the cortical folding patterns. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S129–38. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    de Vareilles H, Wu S-CJ, Al-Manea A, Thomas R, Suckling J, Murray GK. Paracingulate Sulcus Classification Protocol V1. 2024;doi:10.17863/CAM.111845
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    Mitchell SC, de Vareilles H, Garrison JR, et al. Paracingulate Sulcus Measurement Protocol V2. 2023;doi:10.17863/CAM.102040
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature. Aug 11 2016;536(7615):171–178. doi:10.1038/nature18933
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Yücel M, Stuart GW, Maruff P, et al. Hemispheric and gender-related differences in the gross morphology of the anterior cingulate/paracingulate cortex in normal volunteers: an MRI morphometric study. Cereb Cortex. Jan 2001;11(1):17–25. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.1.17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Williams CM, Peyre H, Toro R, Ramus F. Comparing brain asymmetries independently of brain size. Neuroimage. Jul 1 2022;254:119118. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119118
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    Kong XZ, Mathias SR, Guadalupe T, et al. Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 29 2018;115(22):E5154–e5163. doi:10.1073/pnas.1718418115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Leucht S, Samara M, Heres S, Davis JM. Dose Equivalents for Antipsychotic Drugs: The DDD Method. Schizophr Bull. Jul 2016;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90–4. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Kong XZ, Postema MC, Guadalupe T, et al. Mapping brain asymmetry in health and disease through the ENIGMA consortium. Hum Brain Mapp. Jan 2022;43(1):167–181. doi:10.1002/hbm.25033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    Yücel M, Stuart GW, Maruff P, et al. Paracingulate morphologic differences in males with established schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging morphometric study. Biol Psychiatry. Jul 1 2002;52(1):15–23. doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01312-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Le Provost JB, Bartres-Faz D, Paillere-Martinot ML, et al. Paracingulate sulcus morphology in men with early-onset schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. Mar 2003;182:228–32. doi:10.1192/bjp.182.3.228
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Cachia A, Borst G, Jardri R, et al. Towards Deciphering the Fetal Foundation of Normal Cognition and Cognitive Symptoms From Sulcation of the Cortex. Front Neuroanat. 2021;15:712862. doi:10.3389/fnana.2021.712862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    Kennedy N, Boydell J, Kalidindi S, et al. Gender differences in incidence and age at onset of mania and bipolar disorder over a 35-year period in Camberwell, England. Am J Psychiatry. Feb 2005;162(2):257–62. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Loranger AW. Sex Difference in Age at Onset of Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1984;41(2):157–161. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790130053007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Suessenbacher-Kessler S, Gmeiner A, Diendorfer T, Schrank B, Unger A, Amering M. A relationship of sorts: gender and auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Arch Womens Ment Health. Oct 2021;24(5):709–720. doi:10.1007/s00737-021-01109-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Toh WL, Thomas N, Rossell SL. Auditory verbal hallucinations in bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD): A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015/09/15/ 2015;184:18–28. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    Liu S, Wang H, Song M, et al. Linked 4-Way Multimodal Brain Differences in Schizophrenia in a Large Chinese Han Population. Schizophr Bull. Mar 7 2019;45(2):436–449. doi:10.1093/schbul/sby045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Schimmelpfennig J, Topczewski J, Zajkowski W, Jankowiak-Siuda K. The role of the salience network in cognitive and affective deficits. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1133367. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1133367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Modinos G, Vercammen A, Mechelli A, Knegtering H, McGuire PK, Aleman A. Structural covariance in the hallucinating brain: a voxel-based morphometry study. J Psychiatry Neurosci. Nov 2009;34(6):465–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Sha Z, Schijven D, Carrion-Castillo A, et al. The genetic architecture of structural left-right asymmetry of the human brain. Nat Hum Behav. Sep 2021;5(9):1226–1239. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01069-w
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    Pain O, Dudbridge F, Cardno AG, et al. Genome-wide analysis of adolescent psychotic-like experiences shows genetic overlap with psychiatric disorders. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Jun 2018;177(4):416–425. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32630
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted November 19, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Reassessing Asymmetry Reduction in Psychosis: Cingulate Folding and Gyrification Covariance in Patients with Auditory Hallucinations
Shun-Chin Jim Wu, Héloïse de Vareilles, Samantha C. Mitchell, Atheer Al-Manea, Jane Garrison, Michail Mamalakis, Jon S. Simons, Arnaud Cachia, Jean-François Mangin, Stener Nerland, Lynn Mørch-Johnsen, Ingrid Agartz, John Suckling, Graham K. Murray
medRxiv 2024.11.07.24316889; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.24316889
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area