Abstract
Understanding tissue degradation with age and disease requires a clear picture of capillary function, but the small size of capillaries makes them difficult to model, perturb, and image. To measure capillary reactivity and stiffness, we recorded videos of nailbed capillaries while applying increasing external pressure to the finger. Combining the velocities at each pressure into participant velocity distributions showed that participants aged fifty and over (n=19) had a significantly higher median velocity than participants under fifty (n=16), whereas the effects of sex and blood pressure were insignificant. Notably, the effects of age were independent of blood pressure, suggesting that this method probes a different aspect of vascular health. Calculating dissimilarity using the earth-mover’s distance between individual and population velocity distributions classified age groups above and below fifty with an AUC of 0.79±0.07. These findings show that pressure-applying video capillaroscopy can measure the effects of capillary stiffening with age and interrogate how individual capillaries respond to the slowing and stopping of blood flow—suggesting that this method could be used to diagnose and evaluate vascular diseases in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This study was not registered because it was not an medical intervention study.
Funding Statement
The Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program NSF GRFP Scholarship CZI Biohub grant: 1197775-1GWMUM Funding: This work is supported by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub. M.L.F. is supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, and the Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
1. Approval: All experimental methods were approved by Stanford institutional review board (IRB) 6 in protocol number 64537. 2. Accordance: All methods were carried out as written in the IRB protocol 64537. 3. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data for this manuscript is protected by HIPAA and therefore is unavailable without the consent of the participants.
