Abstract
A medical school with a focus on community engagement has innovated its admissions process to include three different interview formats and one novel task format. Each component is designed to assess specific attributes of applicants, including teamwork skills, cultural competence, and service orientation. Correlations between these components are low, consistent with the original purpose that each should assess different attributes. To understand the use of the data by the members of the committee that ranks applicants, the authors created a model of seven explanatory variables, comprised of the three interview ratings and one task rating, a review of the written applications, and two measures of past academic performance. With regression analysis, the model significantly predicted applicant rankings, with most of the predictive capacity retained after omission of academic metrics. The results display that the school has developed innovations that allow for a reduced dependence upon academic history, and instead uses a truly holistic approach that is tailored to its mission. Most importantly, the work establishes that the admissions committee uses all the diverse forms of data provided to make decisions, which until this point has been an open question in holistic admissions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Texas at Austin's Office of Research Support and Compliance waived ethical approval of this work (IRB ID: STUDY00002235).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data that can be released are contained within the manuscript. Due to the sensitive nature of admissions data, data cannot be provided in any greater granularity than in the current manuscript.
