ABSTRACT
Background Understanding the lived experiences of people dying with frailty is essential to develop models of care that are appropriate to meet the needs of this growing population.
Aim Synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of people dying with frailty.
Design Systematic review of qualitative literature and thematic synthesis. PROSPERO registration CRD42019141907.
Data sources Fourteen electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, EThOS, Google, Medline, NDLTD, NHS Evidence, NICE, Open grey, Psychinfo, SCIE, SCOPUS and Web of Science) searched from inception to May 2024. Studies were included if they reported on the lived experiences of people dying with frailty, and used an explicit measure of frailty for their sample. Quality was appraised using the Saini and Schlonsky checklist.
Results Of 6,340 unique articles, 19 met inclusion criteria, describing the views of 138 people dying with frailty, 186 relatives /informal carers, and 240 professional caregivers. We identified three themes: ‘Identifying with frailty and dying’, ‘Emotional needs’, and ‘Support with daily living’. There was wide variation in people’s understanding of frailty, and of their proximity to death. Emotional responses to physical symptoms often had a greater impact on lived experiences than the symptoms themselves. People frequently reported a desire to live in the present, with priorities focused more on living than dying.
Conclusion Approaches to palliative care for people dying with frailty should address emotional, as well as physical needs, and facilitate maintenance of existing daily routines. Ensuring that care planning accounts for individual understandings of frailty, and prognostic uncertainty may be particularly helpful.
What is already known about the topic?
Health and social care professionals and policy makers recognise the need to improve equity in palliative care provision for people dying with frailty
A previous systematic review of quantitative literature highlighted the diverse range of physical, psychological and social needs of people dying with frailty
What this paper adds?
The narratives of people dying with frailty often focus on the emotional impact of physical symptoms, and fears around uncertainty
People do not always recognise or identify with the concept of ‘frailty’, and unless actively dying, often express the desire to be supported to live independently for as long as possible
Care providers express the need for holistic care, and voice frustration at service failures, including lack of time and personnel
Implications for practice, theory or policy
Services for people dying with frailty should be configured to be collaborative, flexible, holistic and responsive to changing needs
Clinical training should emphasise the importance of monitoring patient needs, and both understanding and communicating uncertainty and unclear prognoses
Future work and funding must now concentrate on developing and evaluating appropriate models of care
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
DS and BKB were supported by NIHR School For Primary Care Research launching fellowships, EW was supported by Newcastle University institutional funding, BH is funded by the Applied Research Collaboration.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Elizabeth.Westhead{at}ncl.ac.uk, d.stow{at}qmul.ac.uk, Beth.Bareham{at}ncl.ac.uk, Felicity.Dewhurst1{at}ncl.ac.uk, Gemma-Frances.Spiers{at}ncl.ac.uk, Lucy.robinson{at}newcastle.ac.uk, Hannah.O%E2%80%99Keefe{at}ncl.ac.uk, Fiona.Matthews{at}newcastle.ac.uk
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors