Comparison of Oscillometry with Lung Function Parameters between Bronchial Asthma with Airflow Obstruction and COPD Patients

Sajal De; Aakansha Ashok Sarda

doi:10.1101/2024.10.25.24316127

Abstract

Background Lung oscillometry is an emerging lung function test for assessing obstructive airway disease. Comparisons of oscillometry parameters and their bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) between bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are limited.

Research Question Do oscillometry parameters and their BDR differ between stable asthma and COPD patients with similar severity of airflow obstruction?

Study Design and Methods We included 467 consecutive adult patients with a clinical history of asthma (n=187) or COPD (n=280). Oscillometry, spirometry, and body plethysmography were performed before and after inhaling 400 μg of salbutamol. Patients were stratified based on the severity of airflow obstruction in spirometry. The z scores of the oscillometry parameters were used for the comparison. The BDR of oscillometry parameters with other lung function parameters was also compared.

Results The average age of the study population was 54.9 years, and 76.4% were male. COPD patients were older, had a greater number of smokers, and had poorer lung function. The magnitude of oscillometry parameters worsened with increasing severity of airflow obstruction, regardless of the underlying disease. Asthma patients, particularly those with moderate and severe airway obstruction, had significantly higher R5 and R19 than COPD patients. The within- and whole-breath X5 of asthma were not different from those of COPD patients with similar severities of airflow obstruction. Expiratory flow limitation at tidal breaths (ΔX5 > 0.28 kPa/L/s) was observed in both asthma and COPD patients across all severities of airflow obstruction. The proportion of BDR in oscillometry was significantly lower than that in spirometry for both asthma (35.3% vs. 57.1%; p<0.01) and COPD patients (19.3% vs. 47.1%; p=0.02).

Interpretation Oscillometry parameters except for R5 and R19 did not differ between asthma and COPD patients with similar severities of airflow obstruction. Similar to spirometry, COPD patients had lower BDR in oscillometry than asthma patients.

Study Question Are oscillometry parameters and their bronchodilator responsiveness different between bronchial asthma and COPD patients with similar severities of airflow obstruction?

Results We compared the FOT between 187 bronchial asthma and 280 COPD patients. Except for R5 and R19, the severity and distribution of high oscillometry parameters did not differ between asthma and COPD patients.

Interpretation The severity of oscillometry abnormalities is primarily determined by the severity of airflow obstruction, not the underlying disease.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IEC of AIIMS Raipur approved the study

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes