Abstract
Background The Israeli operation in the Gaza Strip has damaged much of the territory’s food system, exposing vulnerable population groups to poor nutrition. We retrospectively estimated food availability per capita and the contribution of different food sources and categories during the first ten months of the war.
Methods We described the composition and caloric value of food trucked into Gaza based on United Nations data over the period 7 October 2023 to 31 August 2024 and compared these with the Israeli government’s. We supplemented trucking data with information on baseline stocks, agricultural output, air or seaborne deliveries, population denominators and pre-war caloric intake estimates into a probabilistic simulation to estimate caloric availability in both northern and south-central governorates.
Results Between October 2023 and April 2024, food trucks entering Gaza remained below pre-war levels. Israeli data offered higher estimates of food weight trucked in but appeared to feature extreme approximation. Following Israel’s takeover of crossings in May 2024, United Nations data likely featured underreporting, though even Israeli data indicated declining deliveries. The share of food categories changed little during the period analysed, but trucked-in food’s caloric value was lowest just as food was scarcest (February-March 2024). Trucks accounted for three-fourths of food in south-central Gaza, but <20% in the north; air and sea deliveries made up a small percentage. During at least 12 weeks in northern and 4 weeks in south-central Gaza, per-capita caloric availability was below the recommended intake.
Conclusions Israel, as occupying power, did not ensure sufficient food availability throughout the analysis period, and its data appear unreliable. Existing stocks probably mitigated caloric deficits resulting from insufficient deliveries, but air and sea routes added little. Strengthened coordination of food deliveries may be warranted to optimise caloric quantity and dietary diversity despite aid restrictions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was conducted with the support of the UK Humanitarian Innovation Hub (UKHIH) and the donor, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (ref. 29926).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All datasets (including URL sources for each datum) and R analysis scripts are available on https://github.com/francescochecchi/gaza_food_availability.
