What is the most effective method of delivering Making Every Contact Count training? A rapid review

Recency of the evidence base

• The review included evidence available up until June 2024. Publication dates of included evidence ranged from 2013 to 2023.

Extent of the evidence base

• 11 studies were identified for inclusion in this review; all focused on healthcare organisations.

• 10 studies took place in the UK (eight of which were in England, and none in Wales), and one was undertaken in Australia. All studies included health care or public health professionals, with two also including trainees who worked in a local authority.

• Study designs included pre-test/ post-test, post-test only, qualitative study designs (e.g. interviews, surveys), and mixed methods studies. No study included a separate control group.

• Five of the included studies used surveys or questionnaires only, three used interviews only (either with individuals or focus groups), two used a combination of surveys and interviews, and one undertook surveys, interviews and performed observations of participants.

Key findings and certainty of the evidence

• There was consistent evidence that training increased both trainee confidence and use of MECC-related techniques immediately following training. There was some evidence that despite a slight reduction, these improvements were at least maintained up to one year later. There was no evidence on the longer-term effect, other than an indication that refresher training would be appreciated. There was also no evidence assessing whether improvements in trainee confidence and competence had any impact on service user behaviour change and outcomes.

• There was an indication that face-to-face training was preferred to online training. However, some trainees did seem to prefer online training due to its increased flexibility.

• Barriers to MECC training attendance included a feeling that there was not enough time, and a lack of managerial support.

• Barriers to MECC utilisation included a feeling that there was not enough time, a lack of organisational and managerial support, a fear of upsetting patients, and a lack of awareness of downstream support services to refer service users to following healthy behaviour conversations.

• The evidence indicated that barriers to MECC training and utilisation could be overcome via provision of information about downstream support services, and improved organisational and managerial support for both attendance at MECC training and its use in practice.

Policy and Practice Implications

• MECC training can be beneficial in improving trainee confidence and competence in using MECC. However, there are consistently reported barriers both to undertaking training and using MECC in practice, as summarised above. Although this review identified some potential ways of overcoming barriers both for attending training and utilising MECC in practice, the best and most effective ways of overcoming them remain unclear, and many require a widespread culture change.

• The lack of evidence around whether changes to MECC training have an impact on service user behaviour and eventual outcomes, may impact how effective attempted changes to MECC training and workplace culture could be.

• This review indicates that there appears to be a preference for standardised training with some capacity for tailoring to local needs. This should be taken into account when considering any updates to the Welsh MECC training modules.