Abstract
Introduction Handwashing facilities (HWFs) are associated with higher rates of handwashing with soap, and the presence of a HWF is the global proxy indicator of household handwashing behaviour. There is limited information on attributes of HWFs important to end-users with few comparative assessments of HWFs from a user-perspective. We aimed to identify attributes of HWFs important to end-users and determine how pre-manufactured HWFs ranked against these attributes.
Method We identified eight pre-existing HWFs: two locally manufactured (Kalingalinga bucket and Tippy tap) and six industrially produced designs (Jengu, SatoTap, SaniTap, HappyTap, SpaTap, and Kohler Cleanse). Two rounds of focus group discussions were conducted with a diverse group of targeted end-users in two peri-urban communities in Lusaka, Zambia. In the first, participants discussed aspects of each HWF they liked and disliked, and thematic analysis was used to define nine attributes for comparision across each HWF. In the second round, participants individually ranked each HWF against the identified attributes, their overall preference, and overall preference once estimated retail prices were revealed. Participants also ranked attributes by importance. Ranking data were modelled using rank-ordered logistic regression.
Results Discussions revealed nine attributes important to end users: appearance, water management, hygienic use, convenience, water disposal, vulnerability to theft or breakage, ease of use, price and maintenance. Hygienic use and water management were considered most important attributes. Excluding price, facilities resembling a sink, such as the Happy Tap (34%) and Jengu (28%), had the highest probability of being ranked first. With consideration for price, participants preferred lower-cost HWFs such as the Kalingalinga bucket (44%), Tippy Tap (13%) and SATO Tap (10%).
Conclusion This study identified nine attributes important to end-users that can inform future design efforts. Future work will explore user preferences in situ by rotating households through specific HWF for an extended period. Potential manufacturers should continue to iterate on HWF designs emphasizing on reducing costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Reckitt PLC through an unrestricted donation to LSHTM. The funder had no role in the design of the study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research Ethics Committee of London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref 29745) and the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (Ref UNZABREC 4329-2023) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.