Gendered sport environments and their theoretical contributions to women’s ACL injury risk: a scoping review

Joanne L Parsons, Olayinka Akinrolie, Hal Loewen, Stephanie E Coen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.24315187

Abstract

Objective To summarize the current literature that describes the gendered environments of women’s sports which are higher risk for ACL injury, and determine whether the existing literature relates gendered aspects of the sport environment to injury.

Design Scoping review.

Data sources Electronic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and Women’s Studies International databases from inception to March 2024.

Eligibility criteria Studies were included if at least 50% of the study participants were adult women participating in organized sports with higher risk for ACL injury.

Results Of the initially identified 17,148 studies, 854 underwent full text review, and 73 were included in this scoping review. In 19 studies, reference to injury was restricted to one or two direct quotes from an athlete and the other 54 studies had no mention of injury. We identified three repeating patterns describing the gendered sport environments that women athletes encounter. Fifty-five studies described embedded stereotypes that devalue women and women’s sport. Forty-five studies described ways the sport environment reproduces restrictive gender norms for women. Forty-six studies reported that gendered inequities including gendered wage inequality and provision of subpar training facilities were structurally embedded in women’s sport environments.

Conclusion Existing literature describes a range of gendered inequities that exist for women in their sport environments; however, there has been no concerted effort to date to link those gendered environmental factors to ACL injury. Such research is needed if we are serious about eliminating the ACL injury rate disparity between women and men.

What is already known

  • Historically, gendered disparities in anterior cruciate ligament injury risk have focused on biological explanations

  • Societal gendered norms and expectations of women can greatly affect their experiences and opportunities in sport environments

What are the new findings

  • Existing literature describes a range of gendered inequities that exist for women in their sport environments

  • Only a small percentage (∼25%) of studies describing the gendered aspects of women’s sport environments mention any relation to injury

  • There has been no concerted effort to link gendered aspects of sport environments to women’s injury risk and experiences

INTRODUCTION

Sport participation offers numerous benefits, including improved physical and mental health, social connection, and a sense of community.1 However, because sport opportunities were historically created for men, by men, gendered inequities are arguably an inevitable part of the sport system. This can adversely affect participation rates and the experiences that girls and women have in sport.2 The negative consequences may even extend to physical injury risk, as girls and women experience anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries at significantly higher rates compared to boys and men.3,4 The consequences of these injuries can be severe. Sustaining an ACL injury can lead to early development of osteoarthritis and the need for joint replacement5 and has lifelong implications for health and physical activity engagement for the athlete.6,7 In high performance environments where training and competition are often structured around a rigid 4-year Olympic cycle, loss of player availability can compromise the sport organization’s performance targets, and athletes can be at risk of losing critical funding.

Attempts to explain and remedy ACL injury rate disparities between women and men have met with limited success over the last 30 years.8,9 One significant factor in the lack of progress may be the overwhelming focus on biological explanations for injury risk (e.g., anatomy, menstrual cycle).10–13 Possible wider societal influences have rarely been considered, and so the majority of risk factors for injury are considered intrinsic to the athlete and their individual responsibility to address. However, wider societal gendered norms and expectations of girls and women have been shown to greatly affect their experiences, opportunities, and participation in sport environments.14,15 One clear example is the weight room environment – while resistance training is a key component for effective sports injury prevention and rehabilitation, many girls and women feel uncomfortable and even unwelcome in those spaces.16–19 Work in the public health arena suggests that injury prevention efforts are most effective when broader society and cultural norms are targeted, rather than placing the burden on individual people to change their behaviour.20,21 To reconceptualize opportunities to intervene in sports injury from this widened lens, we previously developed a gendered environmental approach to illustrate how gender can operate as an extrinsic determinant of risk from the pre-sport, training, and competition environments through to injury and the treatment environment (Figure 1).22 To date, the field of sports medicine has not approached sports injury from this broader perspective, and we lack critical information regarding the gendered features of the sport environment that may be contributing to increased injury risk for women.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Gender as a pervasive developmental environment in the injury cycle. Reproduced from Anterior cruciate ligament injury: towards a gendered environmental approach, Parsons JL, Coen SE, Bekker S, 55:984-990;2021, with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This scoping review primarily sought to answer the question: What literature currently exists that describes the gendered aspects of women’s sports environments which are higher risk for ACL injury? We also sought to identify whether this existing literature relates gendered aspects of the sports environment specifically to injury; determine whether the described gendered sports environments align with the 4 environments depicted in our gendered environmental approach to sports injury; and summarize the gendered environments that exist for women in sport.

METHODS

Equity, diversity, and inclusion statement

Our research team is gender balanced, spans career stages from a recent PhD graduate to mid and late-career academics, and draws together expertise across social sciences, clinical health sciences, and library sciences. Our study set out to identify inequities for women in sport, and in the data collection phase we purposefully included a column in our extraction table to capture mention of any intersectionality (e.g., race/ethnicity, religion, sexuality) in the included papers.

Study design

We undertook a scoping review, as this type of review is especially useful in emerging research areas such as this in which a variety of methods are employed in the publications of interest.23 As we were designing the study, a preliminary search indicated that there were no similar existing reviews examining the relationship between the gendered aspects of women’s sport environments and injury. We registered the scoping review on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9b7kh). The theoretical framework guiding the project is outlined below, followed by a description of the stages for our scoping review which closely follow previous authors’ recommendations,23–26 and reflect the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines (Supplementary File 1).27

Theoretical framework

The historical approach to the study and management of sports injury decontextualizes sporting bodies from the world around us, instead focusing heavily on biological explanations. To reconsider sports injury from a wider lens, we developed a gendered environmental approach that views sports injury as a bio-social phenomenon where sporting bodies are situated in social environments that may have ‘gendering’ effects, to the detriment of women and girls.22 We argue that the dominant sports injury paradigms used to date not only foreclose other possible explanations for gendered inequities in injury risk and outcomes, but can also propagate sexist beliefs that women’s bodies are “unfit” for sport. Using the example of ACL injury, our model (Figure 1) illustrates how adding gender as a pervasive developmental environment28 requires us to consider the many plausible ways in which wider societal forces may influence sports injury risk and outcomes, and forces us to think beyond defaulting to biological differences. Our approach22 proposes that sport consists of four potentially gendered environments – 1) Pre-sport, 2) Training, 3) Competition, and 4) Treatment. Bringing this perspective to the sports medicine realm means we require the physical sporting body to be viewed as situated in social and material environments that, overtly or not, shape injury risk, prevention, and rehabilitation in highly gendered ways. We used our gendered environmental approach to sports injury to guide the collating, summarizing, synthesis, and reporting stages of our scoping review.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were guided by the “Participants, Concept, Context” principles of scoping reviews26 and finalized through multiple research team discussions as the screening process unfolded (Table 1). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method designs were considered. The first author determined those sports included in the Paris 202429 and Milan 202630 Olympic Games that are higher risk for ACL and therefore suitable for inclusion.4,31–44 The list of included Olympic program sports can be found in Appendix A.

View this table:
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Data sources

In consultation with the Health Sciences librarian (HL) and using key terms from our primary research question and sub-questions, we created a comprehensive initial search strategy to use across multiple electronic databases. The initial search strategy (Appendix B) was peer reviewed by an additional health sciences librarian not involved with the study to ensure subject headings, keywords, and the search syntax were correct. The search was run across the following databases - Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and Women’s Studies International. The initial search was completed in December 2022 and identified approximately 10,000 potential studies. An updated search was completed in March 2024 to capture studies published after the initial search. Results were uploaded to Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia), a web-based software platform that facilitates the review process; duplicates were identified and removed. A total of 10,944 studies were identified from the database search that required screening (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

PRISMA flow diagram indicating study identification and selection.

Study selection

To complete the initial title and abstract screening, every reference was screened by two research team members chosen at random by Covidence. We undertook three pilot sessions where the team screened approximately 50 titles each before meeting as a group to discuss the process and resolve conflicts. The research question was refined at this point to focus on Olympic sports that were high risk to ACL injury, and we refined our exclusion criteria. Once we were satisfied with the level of agreement among reviewers, we completed the initial screening, which included both title and abstract review. If the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met, or if it was unclear to the reviewers as to the relevance of an article just by reading the abstract, the study was moved to full text review.24 Initially, we met regularly as a group to discuss challenges with deciding whether a source should be included or not.23 We subsequently met in pairs to complete the resolving of conflicts to improve efficiency. As a significant portion of the conflicts involved studies that focused on the perspectives of sport coaches, administrators, or leadership, we decided to add this to the exclusion criteria. As we began the full text screen, we created a hierarchy of exclusion criteria to limit the number of conflicts in Covidence that appeared because the reviewers chose different reasons for exclusion. Each full text was read by two team members, and if a conflict occurred, the full text was read by at least one additional individual to make a final decision about its inclusion. The first author kept a research diary, minuted every team meeting, and archived email communication to document and describe the decisions we made along the way.25

Data extraction

We collectively developed an extraction data form which captured pertinent information relevant to our research questions.23 As with the search strategy and determining inclusion and exclusion criteria, this process was iterative in nature as we discovered additional information we wanted to capture. One team member (OA) read and charted all included articles, while two other team members (JLP and SEC) each read and charted about one half of the references. Any disagreements resulted in a consultation with the wider team to agree on relevant information to be extracted and make amendments to the extraction form as needed. Having one team member read and chart all references added consistency to the review.25 Data extracted included the following categories:

  • Citation details (authors, date, title)

  • Country where research took place

  • Study population characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, class) and sample size

  • Type and level of sport

  • Study aims

  • Study design

  • Mention of intersectionality

  • Gendered environment (pre-sport, training, competition, and/or treatment)

  • Gendered environmental features (socio-cultural and material)

  • Mention of relationship between sports injury and environment

  • Main findings

Data synthesis

To address the research questions, we descriptively summarized and presented the data in text and table format. To summarize the gendered environmental features in the included papers, the last author (SEC) qualitatively described the data using a thematic survey approach.45,46 We did not examine the included studies for quality or undertake a formal thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The electronic database search identified 17,148 studies for potential inclusion (Figure 2). We removed 6204 duplicates and excluded 10,090 studies after title/abstract screening. Of the 854 references that underwent full text screening, 73 were included in this scoping review (Table 2). Figure 2 shows the total number of studies at each stage of the process, and the reasons for the excluded studies.

View this table:
Table 2

Characteristics of studies included in the scoping review

Participant and study characteristics

The number of participants across all included studies was approximately 1600; studies that included a description of their sample size reported participant numbers ranging from 4 to 300 individuals. More than half of the studies (n = 52) were conducted in North America and Europe. Twenty-nine studies described aspects of the cultural or ethno-racial demographics of their sample. Seven studies described the sexual identities of their sample.47–53 The most commonly studied sport was football (soccer). The level of play of the athletes in the included studies varied. Professional athletes were most often studied; recreational and club level athletes were least often the target population. More than half of the included studies discussed the intersection of gender with other identities (e.g., race, sexuality) in their results and/or discussion sections beyond simply including those identities as characteristics of the study sample. Most studies used qualitative methods, with only 5 of the 73 studies (7%) employing quantitative methods.54–58 Interviews were the most common qualitative method, but observation, focus groups, ethnography and arts-based methods were also reported. See Table 2 for a detailed description of the included studies.

Gendered sport environments

When considering the four sport environments we identified in our gendered environmental approach,22 most studies focused on the Training and Competition environments, very few touched on the Pre-sport environment, and only one included information relevant to the Treatment environment. We identified two studies that described environmental features such as labour policies that did not neatly fit into any of our four proposed sport environments; we categorized these as “other”.65,72

Only 19 of the 73 included studies specifically mentioned a relationship between gendered sport environments and injury.54,55,59,62,63,71,72,83,85,86,93,100,101,109,114,115,117–119 Most of these 19 studies contained minimal discussion on the topic, and any mention of injury was restricted to one or two direct quotes from an athlete. Most commonly, the lack of adequate resources (first aid equipment, poor field conditions, lack of health insurance coverage) in relation to injury risk and experiences were described.

We identified three repeating patterns within the included studies when summarizing the gendered sport environments that women athletes encounter.

1) “Ladies tees” and “tarts”: Embedded stereotypes that devalue women and women’s sport

Fifty-five studies reported gender stereotypes embedded within women’s sport environments that worked to normalize women athletes as occupying a position secondary to men. Studies described how negative stereotypes that cast women as fragile, ‘dainty,’ unfit for sport, or unserious about sport permeated everyday sport experiences,54,67,73,84,85,87–89,91,92,97–100,109,111,112 including ingrained ideas about women as biologically inferior to men.47,52,54,59,63,64,86,87,93,100,102,103,119 Such stereotypical norms effectively peripheralize women within the sport setting, while benchmarking men as ‘true’ athletes.100

Institutionalized practices normalized women’s secondary position, such as prioritizing men’s opportunities even when women’s teams achieved better results55,73,85,105,115 or not recognizing women’s achievements.105,112 These disenfranchising stereotypes were entrenched in everyday language across sports, such as learning to surf by body-boarding (lying prone on a board) being called ‘women’s surfing’90 or ‘futebol femenino’ (women’s football) being used as a ‘lesser than’ term.89 Outright sexism, discrimination, and harassment were commonly reported,48,52,54,58,66,68,72,82,83,89,91,93,97,101–103,106,108,119 such as women runners being catcalled.101 Two studies described gender stereotypes specifically related to coaches, where athletes believed a “protective father-figure would be best”107 and male coaches were more direct in their communication style.57 Other studies demonstrated how characteristics such as race and age intersect with these stereotypes in the sport environment to doubly disadvantage minoritized sportswomen, from exposure to everyday microaggressions to overt verbal abuse and discrimination.56,60,69,108,110

Studies additionally reported how gender stereotypes (e.g., nurturing qualities) further condition women’s participation on providing additional gendered labour, such as volunteer work or fan engagement whereas their male counterparts are not expected to do the same.47,63,92 Such “unwaged inspirational work” was tied to pressure on women to serve as role models,65 and relates to another norm that women athletes should be grateful for their opportunities despite the myriad disadvantages and barriers they face compared with men.47,65,72,105 The sport environment taxes women athletes with expending affective labour, where their time could be better spent training or recovering.47,65

2) “Play like a man and perform like a lady off the pitch:” Restricting or redefining femininities?

Forty-five studies described ways that the sport environment both reproduces restrictive behavioural and bodily gender norms for women, while in other ways acts as a counter-hegemonic space for more flexible femininities. One of the features of this was compulsory heterosexuality, and in particular ensuring the appearance of heterosexuality.53,59,70,73,78,80–82,92,93,98,113,116 This dimension of the gendered sport environment can impose another form of invisible labour where women feel compelled to manage how their gender and sexuality are ‘read’, both on and off the field of play.59,71 Such norms could hold women back. For example, in golf, McGinnis et al. (2009) found that being ‘too good’ was seen to compromise femininity, and so some women were hesitant to be too competitive. Other studies described how the sport environment created what could be described as ‘contingent’ femininities, meaning women athletes could ‘acceptably’ exhibit traditionally masculine traits if counter-balanced with traditional feminine qualities.62,91,92,103,105 Studies also reported instances where sport environments rewarded the adoption of conventionally masculine traits by women, including examples from boxing,75 handball,76 rugby,78 and surfing.111 Still, such traits could be contentious off-the-field with Gill (2007), for example, reporting disapproval of women rugby players being loud, boisterous, and conspicuously consuming alcohol. There were racialized dimensions to ‘acceptable’ sport femininities, with studies reporting how Black women athletes could be expected to embody stereotypes about ‘natural’ strength77 or speed.56 Still, in some cases, sport environments created space for flexible femininities and were more open to women participating on their own gendered terms.50–52,101,119 In an example from the Canadian women’s boxing team, McGannon et al. (2019) reported how valuing aggression and skill destabilized normative femininity.

Other studies reported how sport environments regulate women’s bodily presentation through clothing and physique norms. The literature described how physique operated as a representation of a ‘real’ athlete,75,79 and for women this often entailed maintaining a heterosexualised feminine aesthetic.52,80,90 Some women exaggerated their physical feminine presentation to avoid any ‘gender trouble’89 or engaged in body manipulation – through dieting, or excessive exercise – to conform to an idealized female athlete body.89,94,103,105 Clothing was a way to manage feminine bodily representations. Several studies reported how clothing was both a way to demonstrate traditional femininity (e.g., “wear skirts in competition so you could ‘tell they were women”)75,82 as well as to ‘cover’ femininity to avoid sexualised attention.68,90,105 Negotiating different feminine presentations and styles could be a means of acceptance (or exclusion) in sport.114 In boxing, Lafferty and McKay (2004) reported how women who wore revealing clothes were not taken seriously and sexualized by male boxers, while at the same time men were free to take their shirt off to box without social sanction. Clothing and uniforms could also function as exclusionary devices by being incompatible with certain cultural or religious codes for some women.60,88

While the majority of gendered environments described in the included studies resulted in women facing barriers or challenges and being disadvantaged, there were exceptions where positive outcomes were noted. A gendered environment can result in an inclusive and supportive team setting where athletes feel accepted for who they are and do not need to expend energy to present themselves in a ‘socially acceptable’ way.50,51

3) “Training on the men’s pitch was seen as a ‘treat:’” Gendered inequities in opportunities and resources

Forty-six studies reported ways that gendered inequities were structurally embedded in the material conditions of women’s sport environments. Core among these were systemically poor labour conditions, including inadequate remuneration and gendered wage inequality,47,55,61,73,76,92,104 which can result in athletes having to work secondary jobs outside of sport.55,86,104 Horan et al. (2024) describe how this dual employment can impede athlete technical and tactical development by taking time and energy away from sport. This can be compounded by the additional burden of some athletes having to manage their own training and travel.117 Women also described being eligible for less prize money than men,68,90 and in some cases personally covering some of their own expenses.55,117 Studies also reported precarious labour conditions and contracts,47 including termination if pregnant55 or inadequate maternity protection,72,76 and insufficient benefits packages.47,63 Related to the devaluing of women’s time in Pattern 1, women athletes could also be subject to ‘extracurricular’ labour, additional role expectations, and obligations that were neither outlined in their contracts nor paid.65

Studies across a range of different sports reported subpar training facilities, with women relegated to second-rate facilities or having limited access to facilities.47,56,63,71,74,79,81,82,85,86,93,103–105 Culvin (2021) reported in football how ‘training on the men’s pitch was regarded as a “treat“’, while Biram et al. (2021) observed how women’s relegation to a secondary pitch afforded a surface upon which technical training was not possible.63 These inequities extended to inadequate access to specialist support staff, such as sport psychologists, high-quality medical care, and strength and conditioning professionals.69,86,117 There were even examples of only the men’s teams being allocated first aid kits85 or getting preferential accommodation over the women’s teams.117 Inequities were further embossed in the mundane aspects of sport participation, including inadequate toilet provision99,105 and small dressing rooms or no dressing rooms at all.104,105

DISCUSSION

We set out to identify the extent of the current literature that describes the gendered aspects of women’s organized sports environments which are higher risk for ACL injury. To our knowledge, this is the first time describing the breadth of the literature available in this area, and the first attempt to focus on potential links between injuries and the gendered socio-cultural and material aspects of women’s sport environments. Our results uncovered 73 studies, with only about a quarter of those containing any explicit mention of injury in relation to the gendered sport environment. In-depth discussion of injury risk, experiences, and outcomes emanating from women’s gendered sport environments was largely absent and not the primary focus of any of the included studies. The gendered environments in the included studies mapped well onto our existing model,22 with the exception of two studies which looked at issues that transcend a single environment (e.g., labour contracts).65,72

While very few studies mentioned injury in relation to the gendered environments found in women’s sport, the extensive description of those environments and how they act as barriers and disadvantage women appears to support our contention that sports injury should be considered a bio-social phenomenon, with both biological and social influences. Below, we outline some possible theoretical connections between the women’s sport environments described in the included articles and their injury risk and experiences as examples. First, women being thought of as fragile and dainty could plausibly impact injury risk if this results in coaches, parents, or athletes themselves thinking they need to hold back during training. This could mean missing out on the opportunity to train at the appropriate intensities needed to adequately prepare them for the physical demands of their sport. Second, many of the gendered aspects of women’s sport environments described in this scoping review could plausibly lead to decreased time and physical and cognitive energy availability for adequate training and recovery. This could lead to increased injury risk and/or delay in recovery from an injury. For examples, we highlight the additional gendered labour often expected of women athletes but not men; the invisible labour of women needing to keep up ‘acceptable’ feminine appearances by dressing and behaving in certain ways; and the need for women to take on secondary paying jobs because of inadequate sport income. Third, the existence of outright discrimination and harassment could lead to women avoiding certain locations or not training at certain times of day,120 potentially missing out on critical training opportunities to improve fitness and physical skills and decrease injury risk. Perhaps the most obvious link to injury is the gendered inequities in opportunities and resources such as provision of less-than-ideal training facilities, inadequate professional and medical support, and inequitable travel conditions and accommodations. Poor field conditions (e.g., uneven surfaces) may contribute to injury,121 and inadequate care immediately following an injury or in rehabilitation has the potential to delay return to sport and affect future player availability.122 Long travel times and poor accommodations result in physical and mental fatigue for players which can translate into increased injury risk during play.123

Some organizations are recognizing these gendered inequities and are taking action to improve the conditions in women’s sport. For example, FIFPRO recently released a comprehensive guide for players and staff to manage athlete pregnancy and return to sport;124 the Danish men’s football team refused a pay raise to ensure the women’s team was paid equitably;125 and we recently developed an evidence-based online exhibition that is being used in high-performance sport to increase awareness of gendered environments and empower sport staff to take action.126 This scoping review confirmed the existence of gendered aspects of women’s sport across diverse settings from football to surfing to field hockey. It is clear that gendered conditions exist for women which can get in the way of them maximizing their potential; the imperative next steps are to go beyond describing the environment to more deeply exploring the relationship with injury, and subsequently taking required action to improve sport conditions for women.

Limitations, strengths, and future research

As we needed to balance the necessity to conduct a thorough search with feasibility and the resources of our team,23–25 we did not review the reference lists of relevant literature we found or conduct a focused grey literature search. We did not critically appraise the final articles for quality or risk of bias, as our primary purpose was to gain general knowledge of the scope of the literature in this topic area. Therefore, our reporting of how the 73 studies fall into the three patterns we identified should be considered with that in mind.127 On the other hand, the multidisciplinary social science and clinical nature of our research team adds rigour to our study by providing varied expertise that ensured comprehensive mapping and reporting of the findings.128

We excluded many studies that focused on the gendered environments experienced by coaches, administrators, and medical staff. There would be value in summarizing the evidence outlining their experiences, and how it could relate to the injury risk and experiences of athletes. We also focused on adult women, but since many injuries, including ACL rupture, occur at a younger age there is a need to scrutinize the gendered environments encountered by youth athletes.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review provides a snapshot of the currently available literature describing gendered aspects of women’s sport environments that are higher risk for ACL injury. Existing literature describes a range of gendered inequities that exist for women in their sport environments; however, there has been no concerted effort to date to link those gendered environmental factors to ACL injury. Such research is needed if we are serious about eliminating the ACL injury rate disparity between women and men.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Funding

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council through the UM/SSHRC Explore Grants Program.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Sheree Bekker for her contributions to the project.

Appendices

Appendix A Included Sports

Appendix B Search strategy

  • 1. women/

  • 2. female/

  • 3. wom?n*.tw,kf.

  • 4. female*.tw,kf.

  • 5. girl*.tw,kf.

  • 6. femme*.tw,kf.

  • 7. feminin*.tw,kf.

  • 8. or/1-7 [female search]

  • 9. exp sports/

  • 10. exp organizations/

  • 11. 9 and 10

  • 12. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and (sport* or athletic*)).tw,kf.

  • 13. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and basketball).tw,kf.

  • 14. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and (football or soccer)).tw,kf.

  • 15. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and gymnastics).tw,kf.

  • 16. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and hockey).tw,kf.

  • 17. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and (handball or lacrosse or rugby)).tw,kf.

  • 18. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and wrestling).tw,kf.

  • 19. ((organiz* or federation or committee or (governing adj1 body) or professional or recreation* or competitive or club* or team*) and (ski or skiing)).tw,kf.

  • 20. or/11-18 [sport organizations]

  • 21. gender identity/ or gender role/

  • 22. (gender* or sex*).tw,kf.

  • 23. or/21-22 [gender]

  • 24. 8 and 20 and 23 [female, gender, sports]

  • 25. limit 24 to english language

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Canadian Women & Sport. The rally report - A call for better, safer sport for girls. 2022.
  2. 2.↵
    The 2018 Tucker Center Research Report. Developing physically active girls: an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach. Minneapolis; 2018.
  3. 3.↵
    Lindenfeld TN, Schmitt DJ, Hendy MP, Mangine RE, Noyes FR. Incidence of injury in indoor soccer. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1994;22(3):364–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Montalvo AM, Schneider DK, Yut L, et al. “What’s my risk of sustaining an ACL injury while playing sports?” A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018.
  5. 5.↵
    Suter LG, Smith SR, Katz JN, et al. Projecting lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and total knee replacement in individuals sustaining a complete anterior cruciate ligament tear in early adulthood. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016;69(2):201–208.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Dunlop DD, Song J, Semanik PA, et al. Objective physical activity measurement in the osteoarthritis initiative: Are guidelines being met? Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2011;63(11):3372–3382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Gföller P, Abermann E, Runer A, et al. Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019;27:2665–2671.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Cheng J, Ammerman B, Santiago K, et al. Sex-based differences in the incidence of sports-related concussion: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2019;11(6):486–491.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21-year population-based study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;44(6):1502–1507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Cameron KL, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Retreat VIII Summary Statement: An update on injury risk identification and prevention across the anterior cruciate ligament injury continuum, March 14–16, 2019, Greensboro, NC. Journal of Athletic Training. 2019;54(9):970–984.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.
    Price MJ, Tuca M, Cordasco FA, Green DW. Nonmodifiable risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2017;29(1):55–64. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000444.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.
    Lin C, Casey E, Herman D, Katz N, Tenforde A. Sex differences in common sports injuries. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2018.
  13. 13.↵
    Covassin T, Elbin R. The female athlete: The role of gender in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2011;30(1):125–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Roth RI, Knapp BA. Gender negotiations of female collegiate athletes in the strength and conditioning environment. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal. 2017;25(1):50–59.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Beckner BN, Record RA. Navigating the thin-ideal in an athletic world: Influence of coach communication on female athletes’ body image and health choices. Health Communication. 2016;31(3):364–373.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Coen SE, Davidson J, Rosenberg MW. Towards a critical geography of physical activity: Emotions and the gendered boundary-making of an everyday exercise environment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2020;45(2):313–330.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    Coen SE, Rosenberg MW, Davidson J. “It’s gym, like g-y-m not J-i-m”: Exploring the role of place in the gendering of physical activity. Social Science & Medicine. 2018;196:29–36.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    Coen SE, Davidson J, Rosenberg MW. ‘Where is the space for continuum?’ Gyms and the visceral “stickiness” of binary gender. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2020:1–17.
  19. 19.↵
    Parsons JR, Jacquie. Understanding the experiences of girls using a high school weight room. Physical and Health Education Journal. 2020;86(2).
  20. 20.↵
    Lund J, Aarø LE. Accident prevention. Presentation of a model placing emphasis on human, structural and cultural factors. Safety Science. 2004;42(4):271–324.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;62(7):1650–1671.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Parsons JL, Coen SE, Bekker S. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: Towards a gendered environmental approach. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;55(17):984–990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010;5:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Daudt HM, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2013;13:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10):2119–2126.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Garritty C, Moher D, Aldcroft A, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;169(7):467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Cheslack-Postava K, Jordan-Young RM. Autism spectrum disorders: Toward a gendered embodiment model. Social Science & Medicine. 2012;74(11):1667–1674.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    International Olympic Committee. Paris 2024 Olympic Competition Schedule by session. https://press.paris2024.org/assets/paris-2024-olympic-sports-competition-schedule-pdf-f49c-7578a.html.
  30. 30.↵
    International Olympic Committee. Official Programme of the Olympic Winter Games Milano Cortina 2026. https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Milano-Cortina-2026/Milano-Cortina-2026-Event-Programme.pdf.
  31. 31.↵
    Agel J, Rockwood T, Klossner D. Collegiate ACL injury rates across 15 sports: National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data update (2004-2005 Through 2012-2013). Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;26(6):518–523. doi: 510.1097/JSM.0000000000000290.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.
    Bram JT, Magee LC, Mehta NN, Patel NM, Ganley TJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury incidence in adolescent athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;49(7):1962–1972.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.
    Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, Joyce B, Shi K. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(12):1320–1325.e1326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    Jarrett GJ, Orwin JF, Dick RW. Injuries in collegiate wrestling. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998;26(5):674–680.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.
    Fountain JL, Meyers MC. Skateboarding injuries. Sports Medicine. 1996;22:360–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.
    Harmer PA. Getting to the point: Injury patterns and medical care in competitive fencing. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2008;7(5):303–307.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.
    Hohn E, Robinson S, Merriman J, Parrish R, Kramer W. Orthopedic injuries in professional surfers: A retrospective study at a single orthopedic center. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2020;30(4):378–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.
    Kauther MD, Wedemeyer C, Wegner A, Kauther KM, von Knoch M. Breakdance injuries and overuse syndromes in amateurs and professionals. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;37(4):797–802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.
    Lim B-O, Kim J, Kim S-H, Cho J-H, Lim S, Lim S-T. The effects of taekwondo shoes on anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors during jump whip kicks. Science & Sports. 2022;37(1):51–57.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.
    Lipetz J, Kruse RJ. Injuries and special concerns of female figure skaters. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2000;19(2):369–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.
    Moon Y. Evaluation of biomechanical movements and injury risk factors in weight lifting (snatch). Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2016;26(4):369–375.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    Morris PJ, Hoffman DF. Injuries in cross-country skiing: Trail markers for diagnosis and treatment. Postgraduate Medicine. 1999;105(1):89–101.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.
    Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G. Injuries in badminton: A review. Science & Sports. 2020;35(4):189–199.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Takahashi S, Okuwaki T. Epidemiological survey of anterior cruciate ligament injury in Japanese junior high school and high school athletes: Cross-sectional study. Research in Sports Medicine. 2017;25(3):266–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer; 2006.
  47. 47.↵
    Allison R. Privileging difference: Negotiating gender essentialism in U.S. women’s professional soccer. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2021;38(2):158–166.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Litchfield C. Finding safe and affirming spaces in women’s field hockey. International Journal of Sport & Society. 2011;2(3):35–46.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    Litchfield C, Dionigi RA. Rituals in Australian women’s veteran’s field hockey. International Journal of Sport & Society. 2013;3(3):171–189.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Mann M, Krane V. Inclusion and normalization of queer identities in women’s college sport. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal. 2018;26(2):76–88.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Martos-Garcia D, Garcia-Puchades W, Soler S, Vilanova A. From the via Crucis to paradise. The experiences of women football players in Spain surrounding gender and homosexuality. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2023;58(7):1075–1091.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    McGannon KR, Schinke RJ, Ge Y, Blodgett AT. Negotiating gender and sexuality: A qualitative study of elite women boxer intersecting identities and sport psychology implications. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2019;31(2):168–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    Organista N, Kossakowski R. Enclaved non-heteronormativity and pragmatic acceptance. The experiences of Polish female football players. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2024;59(1):139–162.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    Tomlinson A, Yorganci I. Male coach/female athlete relations: Gender and power relations in competitive sport. Journal of Sport & Social Issues. 1997;21(2):134–155.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Angelova-Igova B, Naydenova K. Contemporary challenges for women in football. The Bulgarian case. Studia Ethnologica Croatica. 2023;35(1):79–93.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    Scraton S, Caudwell J, Holland S. ’BEND IT LIKE PATEL’. Centring ‘race’, ethnicity and gender in feminist analysis of women’s football in England. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2005;40(1):71–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    Haselwood DM, Joyner AB, Burke KL, et al. Female athletes’ perceptions of head coaches’ communication competence. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2005;28(3):216–230.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    Khetan V, Nimkar N, Karn S, Saharan M. Study of sports and gender stratification. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2020;23(17):SP231753.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    Adjepong A. ‘We’re, like, a cute rugby team’: How whiteness and heterosexuality shape women’s sense of belonging in rugby. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2017;52(2):209–222.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Ahmad A. British football: Where are the Muslim female footballers? Exploring the connections between gender, ethnicity and Islam. Soccer & Society. 2011;12(3):443–456.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    Aiello-Vaisberg TMJ, Kopanakis AR, da Silva GRDA. Offsides in a soccer country. Revista Estudos Feministas. 2021;29(3).
  62. 62.↵
    Berg A, Duffy D, DuBois S. Elegant violence: The promise and peril of a new ‘feminine’ sport ethic. Sport in Society. 2022.
  63. 63.↵
    Biram MD. Mermaids in the land of the king: An ethnography of Santos FC women. Movimento. 2021;27:1–14.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Bowes A, Kitching N. ‘Wow these girls can play’: Sex integration in professional golf. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2021;13(2):217–234.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    Chahardovali T, McLeod CM. Manufacturing dreams and investing in future generations: Women athletes’ inspirational labor in the marketing and promotion of their sport. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2023;40(3):302–311.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    Comley C. “We have to establish our territory“: How women surfers ‘carve out’ gendered spaces within surfing. Sport in Society. 2016;19(8/9):1289–1298.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    Cortes De Oliveira FV, Altmann H, Rodrigues Marques RF. The women inclusion on rugby: Perceptions of Brazilian national team players. Motriz Revista de Educacao Fisica. 2019;25(3).
  68. 68.↵
    Costa GH, Kochanek J, Erickson K. “What does skateboarding mean to you?” An exploratory study of Brazilian skateboarders’ developmental experiences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2023;15(4):566–583.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    Couch SR, Fisher LA, McHenry LK, Moore MJ. Coming to voice: Intersections of identity for Olympic female African American sprinters. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2023;35(1):63–82.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    Cox B, Thompson S. Multiple bodies: Sportswomen, soccer and sexuality. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2000;35(1):5–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    Culvin A. Football as work: The lived realities of professional women footballers in England. Managing Sport and Leisure. 2023;28(6):684–97.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    Culvin A, Bowes A. The incompatibility of motherhood and professional women’s football in England. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2021;3:730151.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    de Moura GX, Pike E, Malagutti JPM, Starepravo FA. ‘Male, violent and dangerous’: The gender prejudices in rugby from the perception of current and former athletes of the Brazil women’s rugby 7’s national team. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2024;59(3):361–80.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.↵
    Doğusan SN, Koçak F. Standing on the ice: Experiences of women national ice hockey players in Turkey. Physical Culture & Sport Studies & Research. 2021;89(1):45–54.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.↵
    Dortants M, Knoppers A. The organization of diversity in a boxing club: Governmentality and entangled rationalities. Culture and Organization. 2016;22(3):245–261.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.↵
    Ekengren J, Stambulova NB, Johnson U, Carlsson IM, Ryba TV. Composite vignettes of Swedish male and female professional handball players’ career paths. Sport in Society. 2020;23(4):595–612.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    Engh MH, Settler F, Agergaard S. ‘The ball and the rhythm in her blood’: Racialised imaginaries and football migration from Nigeria to Scandinavia. Ethnicities. 2017;17(1):66–84.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    Ezzell MB. “Barbie Dolls” on the pitch: Identity work, defensive othering, and inequality in women’s rugby. Social Problems. 2009;56(1):111–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. 79.↵
    Fisher CD, Dennehy J. Body projects: Making, remaking, and inhabiting the woman’s futebol body in Brazil. Sport in Society. 2015;18(8):995–1008.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    George M. Making sense of muscle: The body experiences of collegiate women athletes. Sociological Inquiry. 2005;75(3):317–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. 81.↵
    Gill F. Negotiating ‘normal’: The management of feminine identities in rural Britain. Sociological Research Online. 2007;12(1):169–180.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    Halbert C. Tough enough and woman enough: Stereotypes, discrimination, and impression management among women professional boxers. Journal of Sport & Social Issues. 1997;21(1):7–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  83. 83.↵
    Hanis-Martin JL. Embodying contradictions: The case of professional women’s basketball. Journal of Sport & Social Issues. 2006;30(3):265–288.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. 84.↵
    Harkness G. Spring forward: Female Muslim soccer players in Iraqi Kurdistan. Soccer & Society. 2012;13(5/6):720–738.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    Harris J. Playing the man’s game: Sites of resistance and incorporation in women’s football. World Leisure Journal. 2001;43(4):22–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. 86.↵
    Horan D, Delahunt E, Roe M, Hagglund M, Blake C, Kelly S. ’More than likely the men come first. That’s just very frustrating’. A qualitative exploration of contextual factors affecting the implementation of injury prevention initiatives and the provision of effective injury management in elite-level women’s club. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024;58(2):89–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    Kavoura A, Kokkonen M, Chroni SA, Ryba TV. “Some women are born fighters”: Discursive constructions of a fighter’s identity by female Finnish judo athletes. Sex Roles. 2018;79(3-4):239–252.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    Knez K, Benn T, Alkhaldi S. World Cup football as a catalyst for change: Exploring the lives of women in Qatar’s first national football team – A case study. International Journal of the History of Sport. 2014;31(14):1755–1773.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    Knijnik J. Femininities and masculinities in Brazilian women’s football: Resistance and compliance. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 2015;16(3):54–70.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    Knijnik JD, Horton P, Cruz LO. Rhizomatic bodies, gendered waves: Transitional femininities in Brazilian Surf. Sport in Society. 2010;13(7/8):1170–1185.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.↵
    Kolnes LJ. Heterosexuality as an organizing principle in women’s sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1995;30(1):61–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  92. 92.↵
    Kristiansen E, Broch TB, Pedersen PM. Negotiating gender in professional soccer: An analysis of female footballers in the United States. Choregia. 2014;10(1):5–27.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    Lafferty Y, McKay J. “Suffragettes in satin shorts“? Gender and competitive boxing. Qualitative Sociology. 2004;27(3):249–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. 94.↵
    Lauer EE, Zakrajsek RA, Fisher LA, et al. NCAA DII female student-athletes’ perceptions of their sport uniforms and body image. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2018;41(1):40–63.
    OpenUrl
  95. 95.
    McGannon KR, McMahon J. (Re)Storying embodied running and motherhood: A creative non-fiction approach. Sport, Education & Society. 2022;27(8):960–972.
    OpenUrl
  96. 96.
    McGannon KR, McMahon J, Gonsalves CA. Juggling motherhood and sport: A qualitative study of the negotiation of competitive recreational athlete mother identities. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 2018;36:41–49.
    OpenUrl
  97. 97.↵
    McGinnis LP, Gentry JW. Getting past the red tees: Constraints women face in golf and strategies to help them stay. Journal of Sport Management. 2006;20(2):218–247.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  98. 98.↵
    McGinnis LP, Gentry JW, McQuillan J. Ritual-based behavior that reinforces hegemonic masculinity in golf: Variations in women golfers’ responses. Leisure Sciences. 2009;31(1):19–36.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    McGinnis L, McQuillan J, Chapple CL. I just want to play: Women, sexism, and persistence in golf. Journal of Sport & Social Issues. 2005;29(3):313–337.
    OpenUrl
  100. 100.↵
    Meân LJ, Kassing JW. “I would just like to be known as an athlete“: Managing hegemony, femininity, and heterosexuality in female sport. Western Journal of Communication. 2008;72(2):126–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. 101.↵
    Mirehie M. Women’s experiences of participation in mass participation sport events. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:1027285.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.↵
    Mitchell S, Allen-Collinson J, Evans A. ‘Ladies present!’: An auto/ethnographic study of women amateur golfers at an English provincial golf club. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2016;8(3):273–286.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.↵
    Nuhrat Y. ’Girls on the field’ in Turkey: Negotiating gender anxieties and norms through football. Sport in Society. 2022;25(10):2024–2040.
    OpenUrl
  104. 104.↵
    Oliveira Souza MT, Capraro AM. Women’s football in Brazil: Memories of the national team’s athletes. International Journal of the History of Sport. 2020;37(5/6):378–395.
    OpenUrl
  105. 105.↵
    Öztürk P, Koca C. “The club management ignores us“: Gender-power relations in women’s football in Turkey. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2021;38(3):285–292.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    Pelak CF. Women’s collective identity formation in sports: A case study from women’s ice hockey. Gender & Society. 2002;16(1):93–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  107. 107.↵
    Rima M, Weishaar R, McGladrey B. An exploration of female athletes’ experiences and perceptions of male and female coaches: Ten years later. Sport Journal. 2019;22(1).
  108. 108.↵
    Ruggiero TE, Lattin KS. Intercollegiate female coaches’ use of verbally aggressive communication toward African American female athletes. Howard Journal of Communications. 2008;19(2):105–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. 109.↵
    Russell K, Lemon J. Doing jibber’: Female snowboarders negotiate their place in the snow. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education. 2012;3(3):239–252.
    OpenUrl
  110. 110.↵
    Ryan I. Voices from the margins: ‘Older’ sportswomen speak out. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal. 2006;15(2):3–13.
    OpenUrl
  111. 111.↵
    Sanz-Marcos P. Can women escape the male influence when surfing? An ethnographic study of female surfers in Southern Spain. Sport in Society. 2021;26(4):605–17.
    OpenUrl
  112. 112.↵
    Schinke RJ, Ge Y, Petersen B, Blodgett AT, Dupuis-Latour J, Coholic D. Building a national team context based upon the identity challenges and intervention strategies of elite female boxers in their home training environments. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. 2019;10(2):94–105.
    OpenUrl
  113. 113.↵
    Scraton S, Fasting K, Pfister G, Bunnel A. It’s still a man’s game? The experiences of top-level European women footballers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1999;34(2):99–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  114. 114.↵
    Sisjord MK. Fast-girls, babes and the invisible girls. Gender relations in snowboarding. Sport in Society. 2009;12(10):1299–1316.
    OpenUrl
  115. 115.↵
    Sisjord MK. Women’s snowboarding - some experiences and perceptions of competition. Leisure Studies. 2013;32(5):507–523.
    OpenUrl
  116. 116.↵
    Skogvang BO, Fasting K. Football and sexualities in Norway. Soccer & Society. 2013;14(6):872–886.
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.↵
    Sohal D, Gervis M, Rhind D. Exploration of organizational stressors in Indian elite female athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2013;44(6):565–585.
    OpenUrl
  118. 118.
    Tamminen KA, Holt NL, Neely KC. Exploring adversity and the potential for growth among elite female athletes. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 2013;14(1):28–36.
    OpenUrl
  119. 119.↵
    Young A. Being the ‘alternative’ in an alternative subculture: Gender differences in the experiences of young women and men in skateboarding and snowboarding. Avante. 2004;10(3):69–81.
    OpenUrl
  120. 120.↵
    Kilgour L, Parker A. Gender, physical activity and fear: Women, exercise and the great outdoors. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2013;5(1):43–57.
    OpenUrl
  121. 121.↵
    Straw CM, Samson CO, Henry GM, Brown CN. Does variability within natural turfgrass sports fields influence ground-derived injuries? European Journal of Sport Science. 2018;18(6):893–902.
    OpenUrl
  122. 122.↵
    Han F, Banerjee A, Shen L, Krishna L. Increased compliance with supervised rehabilitation improves functional outcome and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational athletes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;3(12).
  123. 123.↵
    Janse van Rensburg DC, Jansen van Rensburg A, Fowler PM, et al. Managing travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes: A review and consensus statement. Sports Medicine. 2021;51(10):2029–2050.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. 124.↵
    FIFPRO. The postpartum return to play guide. 2024.
  125. 125.↵
    Burrows B. Denmark Euro 2024 squad refuse pay rise to ensure equal pay with women’s team. The Athletic. 2024.
  126. 126.↵
    Coen SE, Downie V, Follett L, McCaig S, Parsons JL. Gendered environmental pathways to sports injury: Insights from retired athletes in the UK high performance context. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Under review.
  127. 127.↵
    Pollock D, Peters MD, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2023;21(3):520–532.
    OpenUrl
  128. 128.↵
    Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2008;6:1–12.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted October 10, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Gendered sport environments and their theoretical contributions to women’s ACL injury risk: a scoping review
Joanne L Parsons, Olayinka Akinrolie, Hal Loewen, Stephanie E Coen
medRxiv 2024.10.09.24315187; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.24315187
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area