Abstract
Background and objectives Following stroke, people often receive informal care from friends and family. Some carers adopt the role quickly whereas others find it more difficult to see themselves as a ‘carer’ and do not access relevant support. This project sought to understand the process of how and when informal carers start to see themselves as such, as well as their preferred terminology and experiences of support in this role.
Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews with eighteen UK adults who had provided care or support to a friend or family member after a stroke. Data were analysed thematically using a template analysis approach. PCPI collaboration, through a formed carer advisory group, enhanced the study methodology.
Results Five main themes were developed: 1) Adopting and adjusting to the care role, 2) Accessibility of support, 3) Perceptions of support, 4) Acceptability of care-related language and terminology, 5) Function of care-related language and terminology. Facilitators and barriers to participants self-identifying with the care role were identified. Self-identification was found to commonly occur at four key points along the stroke trajectory. Two main contrasting opinions around the acceptability of care-related terminology were shared. Accessibility of support services and suggestions for future support provision were discussed.
Conclusion Individuals identify as ‘carers’ at different points and to different extents throughout the stroke trajectory. Various factors influence this process. These findings have implications for the provision of more inclusive and accessible support for informal caregivers of stroke survivors.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study featured heterogeneity in the participant sample in terms of age, relationship to the stroke survivor and duration of care experience.
The use of collaboration with a PCPI group strengthened the study, including with accessibility and appropriateness of the study to participants.
The retrospective approach to the study enabled participants to reflect of their caregiving experience, their insights, and perspectives they developed through this journey.
This study is limited by its minimal diversity in terms of participant ethnicity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work. (Ref: 2023 15237 27180).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
