Abstract
Background Accurate documentation of social determinants of health (SDoH) in electronic health records (EHRs) is critical for developing equitable AI models for diabetes management. This study investigates SDoH data in a cross-institutional EHR database.
Methods We analyzed neighborhood-level (i.e., social vulnerability index [SVI], Rural-Urban Community Area [RUCA]) and individual-level SDoH (e.g., preferred language, marital status, tobacco, alcohol, and substance use) within the Epic Cosmos database, focusing on adults diagnosed with T2D (E11.*) who had encounters between 2021 and 2023. We measured data completeness (i.e., the proportion of individuals who have a non-missing value) and the prevalence of non-canonical values (e.g., preference for language other than English) for each available SDoH variable.
Findings The study included 12,696,680 individuals with T2D. SVI, RUCA and preferred language were available for all individuals, while marital status, and smoking data were available for over 90%. However, financial needs, interpersonal violence, social activity, and physical activity were present in EHRs for 7.6%-24.6% of the population depending on race/ethnicity. Minority groups experienced lower data completeness and higher burden of non-canonical values compared to White individuals.
Interpretation Neighborhood-level and some individual-level SDoH have potential for use in AI development and evaluation. Other SDoH data cannot be used without additional analysis to address high amounts of missing data. Significant disparities in completeness exist across racial/ethnic groups. Addressing these data gaps may require government and payer mandates, standardized SDoH screening tools, and personnel training.
Highlights
This study examined social determinants of health (SDoH) data for adults with type 2 diabetes in a cross-institutional electronic health record (EHR) database to support equitable AI model development.
Neighborhood-level SDoH data and some individual-level SDoH data (individual-level SDoH (i.e., race/ethnicity, preferred language, marital status) were highly complete.
Disparities in SDoH data completeness by race/ethnicity underscore the need for standardized SDoH documentation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As per the University of Utah IRB, this project does not qualify for the DHHS criteria for human subject research because the investigator is not collecting data through intervention or interaction with an individual and there is not identifiable private information in the data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding Statement This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. JCF and RG were partially funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1TR004409. MJO was partially funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases under Award Number P30DK092949
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to Epic Cosmos policies.
