Abstract
Six months of chemotherapy using current agents is standard of care for pulmonary, drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB), even though some are believed to be cured more rapidly and others require longer therapy. Understanding what factors determine the length of treatment required for durable cure in individual patients would allow individualization of treatment durations, provide better clinical tools to determine the of appropriate duration of new regimens, as well as reduce the cost of large Phase III studies to determine the optimal combinations to use in TB control programs. We conducted a randomized clinical trial in South Africa and China that recruited 704 participants with newly diagnosed, drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis and stratified them based on radiographic disease characteristics as assessed by FDG PET/CT scan readers. Participants with less extensive disease (N=273) were randomly assigned to complete therapy after four months or continue receiving treatment for six months. Amongst participants who received four months of therapy, 17 of 141 (12.1%) experienced unfavorable outcomes compared to only 2 of 132 (1.5%) who completed six months of treatment (treatment success 98.4% in B, 86.7% in C (difference -11.7%, 95% CI, -18.2%, -5.3%)). In the non-randomized arm that included participants with more extensive disease, only 8 of 248 (3.2%) experienced unfavorable outcomes. Total cavity volume and total lesion glycolysis at week 16 were significantly associated with risk of unfavorable outcome in the randomized participants. Based on PET/CT scans at TB recurrence, bacteriological relapses (confirmed by whole genome sequencing) predominantly occurred in the same active cavities originally present at baseline. Automated segmentation of the serial PET/CT scans was later performed, and machine-learning was used to classify participants according to their likelihood of relapse, allowing the development of predictive models with good performance based on CT, PET, microbiological and clinical characteristics. These results open the possibility for more efficient studies of future TB treatment regimens.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02821832
Clinical Protocols
https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/4-157
Funding Statement
Funded by a grant from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (CEB3) and in part by the Division of Intramural Research of the NIAID (CEB3) and the EDCTP (SRIA2015-1065) to GW Also funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations Grand Challenges China (QG) and the National Natural Science Foundation of CHINA (81661128043 QG) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Peoples Republic of China (2014DFA30340) PP and SL received funding from the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computation Biology NIAID NIH RJW is supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives funding from Wellcome (CC2112) Cancer Research UK (CC2112) and the Medical Research Council (CC2112) He also received support from Wellcome (203135) and in part by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Imperial College NHS Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was reviewed and approved by the IRB/ethics committees of the NIAID, Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town, South African Medicine Control Council, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, and the Henan Center for Disease Control. The standing NIAID DSMB with three global TB experts added as ad hoc members provided oversight of the trial, meeting at least twice per year to review study data. Pre-specified stopping rules for inferiority of the treatment shortening arm and for study futility were provided to the DSMB. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02821832).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement
All data related to the conduct of this trial are maintained in a locked, secure database and will be made available to any qualified investigator upon completion of a clinical data sharing agreement with NIAID.
