Abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance various aspects of healthcare, including patient care, medical research, and education. The well-known LLM from Open AI: ChatGPT, a user-friendly GPT-4 based chatbot, has become increasingly popular. However, current limitations to LLMs, such as hallucinations, outdated information, and ethical and legal complications may pose significant risks to patients and contribute to the spread of medical disinformation. This study focuses on the application of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to mitigate common limitations of LLMs like ChatGPT and assess its effectiveness in summarizing and organizing medical information. Up-to-date clinical guidelines were utilized as the source of information to create detailed medical templates. These were evaluated against human-generated templates by a panel of physicians, using Likert scales for accuracy and usefulness, and programmatically using BERTScores for textual similarity. The LLM templates scored higher on average for both accuracy and usefulness when compared to human-generated templates. BERTScore analysis further showed high textual similarity between ChatGPT- and Human-generated templates. These results indicate that RAG-enhanced LLM prompting can effectively summarize and organize medical information, demonstrating high potential for use in clinical settings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NRC-IRAP, Canada
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for protocol 2021-144, Clinician feedback on Data & Algorithms, National Research Council-IRAP, Canada
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos