Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of multimorbidity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is an urgent concern for health systems delivery. It is uncertain how best to promote self-management approaches or the actions that patients and carers take to maintain physical and mental health, in this context. This review aims to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize qualitative evidence that describes self-management of multimorbidity among patients and their carers in SSA.
Methods We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL Global Health, Google Scholar and grey literature for studies on self-management of multimorbidity or common individual chronic diseases (HIV, diabetes, hypertension or chronic kidney disease) in SSA published between 1 January 2000 and 28 to 15th September 2024. Using qualitative meta-synthesis techniques to formulate the questions and synthesize findings. We used a 10-point Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)-Qualitative-Checklist to assess the quality of the studies and NVivo 12 software to facilitate a thematic analysis approach.
Results We screened 2010 articles for inclusion and 20 studies met inclusion criteria. We identified themes related to medical, diet, emotional and physical self-management activities. Patients negotiate self-management based on immediacy of needs and available family support. Patients are motivated to apply biomedical management but are limited by factors such as drug stock-outs and out-of-pocket expenditure. Limited knowledge and low self-efficacy toward self-management of multimorbidity impact decision making and problem solving. We found that diabetes mellitus presents the biggest stressor in terms of burden of treatment; temporal discontinuation of medications is more prevalent amongst patients with hypertension; and patients with multimorbidity are frequently hypervigilant about their health, more likely to suffer from stress and to seek healthcare.
Conclusions We found that there is relative lack of data on self-management of multimorbidity among patients and their carers in SSA. Where data exists, we observed significant health literacy gaps, low health literacy support and limited self-efficacy as barriers to implementation of self-management. Context sensitive programmes are required to improve health literacy to increase patient autonomy and their toolkit of options to manage chronic disease.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the NIHR (NIHR201708) using UK international development funding from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK government. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We would like to clarify that our research involved the use of secondary data obtained from publicly available manuscripts in open-access journals. As such, we did not seek approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics committee, as our study did not involve direct interaction with human subjects or the collection of original data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Thank you for your inquiry regarding the underlying data for our manuscript. We would like to clarify that our review utilized secondary data sourced from publicly available manuscripts in open-access journals. As such, we do not have any additional datasets beyond the supporting information already shared with the journal and the reviewed articles, which are all accessible online. Since we conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of existing literature, we do not have original data to share. We have ensured that all sources used are properly cited and available for review
