ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians are front-line in evaluating patients with stroke in the community. Their ability to correctly identify stroke influences downstream management decisions. We sought to use a large national database of prehospital clinical data to determine risk factors associated with missed EMS stroke identification.
METHODS Retrospective study examining EMS evaluation of adults with Emergency Department (ED) stroke diagnosis. We leveraged the ESO Data Collaborative research dataset containing EHR data from 2019-2022 that has a subset of encounters with linked hospital diagnostic codes. Our primary outcome was the presence of an EMS diagnosis of stroke. We evaluated the association between demographic and clinical variables with EMS stroke identification using Pearson χ2 test for demographic variables and multivariable GLM for clinical variables with adjustment for demographic variables.
RESULTS We identified 34,504 EMS encounters for patients with ED stroke diagnosis. Of these, 11,077 (32.1%) strokes had missed EMS stroke identification and instead had an EMS impression of “Generalized Weakness” (25.9%), “Altered Level of Consciousness” (24.9%), and “Dizziness” (7.2%). Patients more likely to have missed prehospital stroke identification were of Black race (p=0.0001) and Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.0001). Clinical variables associated with higher risk of missed EMS stroke identification were suspected alcohol or drug use (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.37-1.59), low GCS (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.24), tachycardia (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), and hypotension (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34-1.61).
CONCLUSIONS Approximately 1-in-3 patients transported by EMS did not have their stroke identified in the prehospital setting. Factors associated with lower odds of missed EMS stroke identification provide a starting point for future performance improvement initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
n/a
Funding Statement
Dr. Caffarelli receives research support from the UCSF Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Hellman Society, and Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation. Andrew Wood is supported by the National Institute on Aging (5R01AG074710) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS116128). Dr. Amorim is a principal investigator in several active grants supported by the NIH (1K23NS119794), the Department of Defense (EP220036), American Heart Association (20CDA35310297 and Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Award), Cures Within Reach, and the Zoll Foundation. Dr. Kim receives funding from NIH/NINDS, NIH/NCATS, NIH/NIMHD, and AHA. Dr. Guterman receives funding from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS116128), National Institute on Aging (5R01AG056715), and American Academy of Neurology.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, San Francisco.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
ABBREVIATIONS
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- EHR
- Electronic Health Record
- EMS
- Emergency Medical Services
- ED
- Emergency Department
- GCS
- Glasgow Coma Scale
- HDE
- Health Data Exchange
- RR
- Relative Risk
- SVI
- Social Vulnerability Index
