Abstract
Background Goal-concordant care (GCC) is recognized as the highest quality of care and most important outcome measure for serious illness research, yet there is no agreed-upon or validated method to measure it.
Objective Assess feasibility of measuring GCC using clinical documentation in the electronic health record (EHR).
Design Retrospective chart review study.
Participants Adults with ≥50% predicted six-month mortality risk admitted to three urban hospitals in a single health system. All participants had goals-of-care (GOC) discussions documented in the EHR 6 months before and 6 months after admission manually classified into one of four categories of goals: (1) comfort-focused, (2) maintain or improve function, (3) life-extension, or (4) unclear.
Main Measures Pairs of physician-coders independently reviewed EHR notes from 6 months before through 6 months after admission to identify and classify care received between each documented GOC discussion into one of the four goals categories. Epochs between GOC discussions were then coded as goal-concordant if GOC and care received classifications were aligned, goal-discordant if they were misaligned, or uncertain if either classification was unclear or not documented. Coder inter-rater reliability was assessed using kappa statistics.
Key Results Inter-rater reliability for classifying care received was almost perfect (95% interrater agreement; Cohen’s kappa=0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). Of 398 total epochs across 109 unique patients, 198 (50%) were goal-concordant, 112 (28%) were of uncertain concordance, and 88 (22%) were goal-discordant. Eighty (73%) patients received care of uncertain concordance during at least one epoch. Forty-eight (44%) patients received goal-discordant care during at least one epoch.
Conclusions Clinician chart review was a feasible method for measuring GCC and can inform natural language processing and machine learning methods to improve the clinical and research utility of this method. More work is needed to understand the driving factors underlying the high rate of uncertain concordance and goal-discordant care identified among this seriously ill cohort.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Dr. Auriemma is supported by a National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grant (K23-HL163402) and a National Institute of Health Loan Repayment Program Award (L30HL154185). Dr. Song is supported by NHLBI Grant T32HL098054. Dr. Weissman is supported by R03HL171424 and R35GM155262. Dr. Halpern is supported by NHLBI Grant 2K24 HL143289. Dr. Courtright is supported by National Institute on Aging (NIA) Grant R01 AG073384. The authors had full independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Pennsylvania or National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania approved this study with a waiver of informed consent under protocol number 849694.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Dr. Auriemma is supported by a National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grant (K23-HL163402) and a National Institute of Health Loan Repayment Program Award (L30HL154185). Dr. Song is supported by NHLBI Grant T32HL098054. Dr. Weissman is supported by R03HL171424 and R35GM155262. Dr. Halpern is supported by NHLBI Grant 2K24 HL143289. Dr. Courtright is supported by National Institute on Aging (NIA) Grant R01 AG073384. The authors had full independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Pennsylvania or National Institutes of Health.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
