Abstract
Background/Objective Relative proportion of cases in a multi-strain pandemic like the COVID-19 pandemic provides insight on how fast a newly emergent variant dominates the infected population. However, the behavior of relative proportion of emerging variants is an understudied field. We investigated the emerging behavior of dominant COVID-19 variants using nonlinear statistical methods and calculated the time to dominance of each variant.
Method We used a phenomenological approach to model national- and regional-level variant share data from the national genomic surveillance system provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to determine the best model to describe the emergence of two recent dominant variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: XBB.1.5 and JN.1. The proportions were modeled using logistic, Weibull, and generalized additive models. Model performance was evaluated using the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and the root mean square error (RMSE).
Findings The Weibull model performed the worst out of all three approaches. The generalized additive model approach slightly outperformed the logistic model based on fit statistics, but lacked in interpretability compared to the logistic model. These models were then used to estimate the time elapsed from emergence to dominance in the infected population, denoted by the time to dominance (TTD). All three models yielded similar TTD estimates. The XBB.1.5 variant was found to dominate the population faster compared to the JN.1 variant, especially in HHS Region 2 (New York) where the XBB.1.5 was believed to emerge. This research expounds on how emerging viral strains transition to dominance, informing public health interventions against future emergent COVID-19 variants and other infectious diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All data is available in the CDC data website: https://data.cdc.gov/Laboratory-Surveillance/SARS-CoV-2-Variant-Proportions/jr58-6ysp/about_data
