Abstract
Background Patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) exhibit low transvalvular flow rate (Q), while maintaining preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Concomitant severe mitral regurgitation (MR) contributes to the low flow state, adding complexity to diagnosis and management. This study aimed to examine the impact of severe MR on outcomes in paradoxical LFLGAS.
Methods Data from an institutional echo database identified 1,189 patients with adjudicated severe aortic stenosis (AVA≤1.0 cm2), low transaortic gradients (mean gradient<40 mmHg), preserved LVEF (≥50%), and low flow rate (Q≤210 ml/sec), to confirm paradoxical LFLGAS. Subgroups were based on MR severity (severe and non-severe). Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, aortic valve replacement (AVR), heart failure hospitalizations, and a composite outcome.
Results In the severe MR group (n=80), patients had lower flow rates, increased LV dimensions and a more eccentric hypertrophy pattern compared to non-severe MR (n=1,109). Over a median 5-year follow-up, severe MR correlated with higher all-cause mortality (p=0.02) and AVR rates (p=0.012). After adjustment, severe MR was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality risk (HR=1.43, p=0.011) and composite outcome (HR=1.64, p<0.001). AVR significantly reduced mortality at every MR degree, with the most substantial impact in severe MR (HR=0.18, p<0.001). Propensity-adjusted models demonstrated a stronger AVR impact with increasing MR degree (p-for-interaction=0.044).
Conclusions Severe MR in paradoxical LFLGAS is associated with adverse outcomes and distinctive LV remodeling. Aortic valve replacement improves survival across all MR grades, with greater impact in severe MR.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No sources of funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study received ethical approval from the Massachusetts General Hospital/Partners Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data is available through the corresponding author.
