Abstract
Background Cities aim to enhance urban accessibility following the adoption of the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, implementation faces challenges due to complex municipal legislation, lack of awareness, and organizational obstacles. Engaging stakeholders and empowering municipal employees through knowledge mobilization is crucial, as shown in a Quebec City’s partnership research process.
Aim To report the implementation strategy as implemented, explore the perception of the employees about the format and feasibility of the implementation strategy and explore the induced changes of knowledge mobilization tools on the implementation determinants of universal accessibility measures for municipal employees.
Methods The study used a multi-method design, involving interviews and a questionnaire with the project steering committee, made up of city employees and the research team. Three 30-minute participatory workshops were conducted for culture, communications, and public consultation administrative units.
Results Participants appreciated the workshop format and video content, suggesting minor improvements for broader implementation. The tools effectively increased engagement in implementing universal accessibility measures, proving valuable for raising awareness.
Discussion and Conclusion The study demonstrates the advantages of a collaborative approach in developing knowledge mobilization tools, enhancing municipal personnel’s capacity for universal accessibility measures, and highlighting the need for adaptable strategies.
Contributions to the litterature
Knowledge mobilization tools created in partnership with knowledge users encourage buy-in and a positive view of the tools.
An interactive implementation strategy actively involving knowledge users promotes awareness and behavior change
Municipal organizations’ context being complex, the implementation strategy must be adapted to each group of people and their reality to facilitate the implementation and adoption of the tools.
The combined use of a theoretical framework and a participatory approach provides a guideline for the development of tools and implementation, while adapting to the specific context.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) partnership program Mobility Access Participation Research Team (#895-2020-1001) and by the Research Team Support program of the Fonds de recherche du Quebec Societe et Culture (FRQSC) (Participation sociales et villes inclusives, grant #2023-SE7-310780). It was also supported by the doctoral scholarship from FRQSC to MC (grant #284142) and research scholar awards from Fonds de recherche du Quebec Sante(FRQS) to FR (grant #296761)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Centre integre universitaire en sante et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, volet readaptation et integration sociale gave ethical approval for this work #2022-2507
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
