Abstract
Introduction The recent surge in clinical claims in Ireland has sparked concerns about the unsustainable trajectory of medical negligence litigation. Current evaluations have primarily focused on the financial and temporal aspects of litigation, leaving a gap in understanding the experiences of plaintiffs within the adversarial system. This study aims to fill this gap by critically exploring the experiences of those affected by medical negligence and the ensuing legal process.
Methods A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to explore the experiences of plaintiffs following patient safety incidents and their interactions with the legal process. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with participants who had been involved in medical negligence litigation in Ireland. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or over and were involved in medical negligence litigation in Ireland (as a plaintiff), whether the case was resolved by negotiated settlement, a form of alternative dispute resolution (e.g. mediation), or trial hearing. Maximum variation sampling was used to capture a diverse range of experiences, with sample size determined by the concept of ‘information power.’ Recruitment was facilitated by the Health Service Executive (HSE) through invitations sent by The National Open Disclosure Office. Interviews were conducted in-person or online, recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Ethical approval was obtained from the Social Research Ethics Committee of University College Cork.
Findings This research presents the views and experiences of fifteen participants; eleven participants shared their experiences relating to an adverse event which impacted a family member (one participant spoke about two family members), nine of whom were children (including both minors and adult children), and three were a spouse. Of the twelve individuals discussed, eight were deceased. Five main themes were identified from the analysis: i) Navigating the aftermath of a patient safety event: Communication, Support and Abandonment; ii) The pathway from adverse event to litigation; iii) Experiences of the Legal System; iv) Emotional and Mental Health Impact of Litigation on Plaintiffs; v) Advocating for Change: Participant Recommendations.
Discussion This research highlights the profound impact of actions taken after a patient safety event on patients, families, healthcare professionals, and organisations, and the importance of Open Disclosure in meeting ethical obligations and ensuring healthcare accountability. It explores the complex relationships between financial compensation, justice-seeking, and the healthcare and legal systems. The findings contribute significant insights to the discourse on medical negligence in Ireland.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Social Research Ethics Committee of University College Cork gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available
