Abstract
Household overcrowding has increased in England. However, there is limited synthesis of evidence about what can be done to reduce the impact of overcrowding on health/well-being.
We undertook a rapid realist review of English language peer-reviewed and grey literature of interventions from comparable settings to urban contexts in England that addressed household overcrowding/health outcomes. A search was conducted (01.06.23) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS.
Two expert panels informed the review. The first comprised individuals with lived experience of overcrowding in London; the second local and regional government representatives from London, Salford and Doncaster (England). Both panels contributed at two stages to guide the scope/literature identification and test/refine programme theories. Final full-text screening and quality appraisal were completed by two independent researchers.
Thirty-one peer-reviewed papers and 27 documents from participating local authorities were included. The peer-reviewed literature, emanating from multiple geographical contexts and of variable study designs and quality, contained 15 evaluated interventions across three categories: Rehousing (n=7 interventions); Home improvements, e.g. renovations/retrofitting (n=6); Co-ordination with healthcare and wider services (combined with home improvements) (n=2). A synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature with expert panel comments and grey literature, identified contexts and mechanisms that could facilitate or hinder achievement of positive health outcomes. There was reluctance to be rehoused elsewhere, with residents fearing the loss of social networks in available properties often located far away from their current homes. Home improvements may alleviate the worst impacts of overcrowding, and residents living in unhealthy conditions can benefit from better healthcare co-ordination.
Significance for public health Reducing the prevalence of overcrowding requires national level and long-term policy changes to increase the supply of affordable homes. Therefore, rehousing will not be a feasible solution in the short-term for many residents. Our rapid realist review illustrates how other interventions such as home improvements and improved healthcare co-ordination/access could address well-being when residents in overcrowded accommodation cannot or do not wish to move. This may require overcrowding to be considered as a council-wide issue that may not be tackled within the housing sector alone, but that will necessitate collaboration with other local authority resources and services such as healthcare in recognition of the wider health impacts of overcrowding. Although the focus for this review is on making recommendations for urban contexts in England, we have also included international peer-reviewed literature and believe our conclusions may be transferable to comparable contexts affected by household overcrowding.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ARC North Thames. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. MO and PS are funded by ActEarly, a grant from the UK Prevention Research Partnership (MR/S037527/1), which is funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Natural Environment Research Council, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), The Health Foundation and Wellcome.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].
List of abbreviations
- CMO
- contexts/mechanisms/outcomes
- HMIC
- Healthcare Management Information Consortium
- HMO
- house in multiple occupation
- MMAT
- Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool
- RAMESES
- Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards
- RCT
- randomised controlled trial
- RRR
- rapid realist review
- SHARP
- Scottish Housing Health and Regeneration Project
- WHO
- World Health Organization
