Associated factors of acculturation strategies and mental health outcomes among international students in China

Chenchang Xiao, Jingyan Yan, Hanjia Li, Changmian Ding, Bin Yu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.08.24313277

Abstract

Objectives There is an increasing number of international students in China. Acculturation strategies are the way students cope with different cultures, including integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization. This study aims to investigate the acculturation strategies and associated factors, and the effect of these strategies on mental health status among international students in China.

Study design Cross-sectional study.

Methods Study data were collected from 567 international students attending universities in China. Acculturation strategies, acculturative stress, depressive symptoms were measured using reliable and valid scales. Linear and multinomial logistic regression were used for analysis.

Results Study findings revealed that integration (31.57%) was the most preferred acculturation strategy, followed by marginalization (28.92%), separation (21.87%) and assimilation (17.54%). Females were more likely to choose separation strategy than marginalization, while students with religions had higher likelihood to choose integration strategy. Students majoring in Literature/Art and liking their major were more likely to use assimilation strategy. Students with more studying time in weekdays and medium studying time in weekends were more likely to prefer integration strategy. Students with separation and integration strategy had higher acculturative stress.

Conclusions Integration is the most popular acculturation strategy among international students in China. Students with separation and integration strategy had worse mental health status. Gender, major, religion, daily study time were significantly associated with the preference of acculturation strategies.

Introduction

International students in China

With the development of economic globalization, China has attracted a large and increasing number of international students to study and work. By the end of 2017, there was a total of 489,200 international students from 204 countries studying in China32. Studying abroad provides international students with opportunities to access quality education and expand intercultural competence3. However, adapting to a new cultural, social and educational environment is challenging and stressful. International students may encounter a lot of challenges, including language barriers, loneliness, homesickness, and academic failures4–6. These difficulties may increase the risk of developing mental health problems, such as acculturative stress and depressive symptoms.

Acculturation and acculturation strategies

Acculturation is a challenging process of change in values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors when individuals interact with different cultures7, 8. Acculturation strategies are the different coping styles taken by individuals when they live with or contact with two cultures9. Acculturation strategies are developed based on Berry’s bi-dimensional acculturation: one is the identification with the heritage culture, and another is the identification with the host culture. Thus, four acculturation strategies are generated, including integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization (Fig 1)7. Integration refers to the strategy that individuals maintain the heritage culture and adopt the host culture simultaneously, while the marginalization strategy comes true for adopting neither of heritage nor host cultures. Assimilation is the strategy that people adopt the host culture but reject the heritage culture, while separation is maintaining the heritage culture but rejecting the host culture. Different acculturation strategies may affect the process of acculturation for international students7, 10, 11.

Fig 1.
Fig 1.

Acculturation strategies based on the attitudes towards the host culture and heritage culture

Effect of acculturation strategies on mental health status

Acculturation strategies have been found to be significantly associated with mental health outcomes, especially acculturative stress and depression20–22. For example, one study conducted among 200 North Indian migrated students in Bangalore city of Karnataka found that students with separation and marginalization strategies had higher acculturative stress23. Another study among Turkish immigrants in Germany showed that people with integration strategy had the lowest level of depression, while people with marginalization had the highest24. International students, as a special mobile population, experienced high levels of acculturative stress and depression27–30. However, to our knowledge, few studies have explored the relationships between acculturation strategies with mental health problems among international students in China. Therefore, one aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different acculturation strategies on mental health status.

Associated factors of acculturation strategies

An overwhelming empirical studies in acculturation have focused on the effects of different acculturation strategies on various outcomes13, 14. However, limited studies have investigated the associated factors of acculturation strategies14, 15. One study conducted among 210 Turkish migrants showed that individuals who were young, female and with higher education often applied a participatory strategy (e.g. integration and assimilation), while those aged 50 or older and less educated often applied non-participating strategy (e.g. separation and marginalization)16. Another study conducted among 313 immigrant adolescents in Portugal showed that ethnicity, majority identity, discrimination, experience adaptation, gender, age were associated with acculturation strategy preference12. Other studies also reported that international students who were married and lived with their spouses may experience sociocultural segregation because a substantial part of their time was invested in being with their spouses17, 18. Another study conducted among international students in China found that male and longer residence significantly predicted lower degree of acculturation19. However, few studies have investigated the effect of study-related factors (e.g., major, study time, etc.) on the preference of acculturation strategies. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the demographic and study-related factors of acculturation strategies among international students in China.

Purpose of the study

The present study aims to (1) investigate the preference of acculturation strategies among international students in China; (2) examine the associated factors of acculturation strategies; (3) analyze the associations between acculturation strategies with acculturative stress and depression. The ultimate goal is to provide data for future effective interventions on mental health among international students in China.

Methods

Participants and sampling

Participants in the study were international students who were attending universities in Wuhan, China with foreign nationality. Wuhan is a university city with 82 colleges and universities with over 19,000 international students were studying in Wuhan in 201633. Four largest universities in Wuhan, covering nearly 60% of the total international students, were selected to recruit participants34.

Detailed sampling processes were described elsewhere5, 34. Briefly, firstly, four universities were selected from Wuhan, including Wuhan University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Central China Normal University, and Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. Secondly, in each selected university, classes of international students, the smallest unit for schooling in China, were randomly selected. All international students in China were grouped into classes to study Chinese mandarin with approximately 40-50 students per class. All international students in the selected classes were eligible to participate. The study was voluntary, and only the students who signed the written informed consent were recruited. A total of 630 international students were recruited and completed the survey.

Data collection

Data were collected through the self-developed International Student Health and Behavior Survey (ISHBS). The ISHBS is a packet of questionnaires that asked about demographic and study-related information, acculturative stress, acculturation strategies, and depression. Both English and Chinese versions of the questionnaire were available for participants to choose from. No significant difference was found between the data collected using Chinese version (n=62) and English version (n=505)5.

The survey was conducted in September 1st in 2012 and ended in November 30th. The survey was implemented in a classroom with a vacant seat placed between two students to ensure personal privacy and independence. At the end of survey, all participants were asked to put their questionnaire into an envelope and placed it into a pre-prepared locked box. Data were manually entered into the computer with Epidata software. Double-entry protocol was used for minimizing data-entry errors. Among 630 international students, 63 were excluded due to the missing data for several key variables, yielding 567 (90%) participants in the final sample. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Wuhan University, China.

Measures

Acculturation Strategy

Acculturation strategy was measured using the self-developed Acculturation Strategy Assessment (ASA) (supplementary Table S1). ASA was developed based on Berry’s four strategies of acculturation7, 35, and several developed scales measuring acculturation strategies7, 36–38. ASA consists of 30 items assessing two dimensions of acculturation with 15 items for each dimension. One dimension measures the host culture adaptation, another dimension measures the self-culture maintenance. A seven-point Likert scale was used to measure the ASA ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total score for each dimension was computed. Median score for each dimension was used as cut-off point. Participants scored high on both dimensions were categorized as “Integration”, and participants who scored low on both were categorized as “Marginalization”. Participants were grouped into “Assimilation” if they scored high on host culture subscale, and low on self-culture subscale, and participants were grouped into “Separation” if scored opposite. The Cronbach alpha was 0.87 for total ASA, and 0.86 for host culture subscale and 0.85 for self-culture subscale.

Acculturative Stress

Acculturative stress was measured using the Acculturative Stress Scale for International Students (ASSIS)39. ASSIS is a widely used scale with 36 items, measured using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). In our previous study5, we categorized the ASSIS into seven subscales, including value conflict (VC), identity threat (IT), opportunity deprivation (OD), mistreated (MT), lack of cultural competence (CC), lack of self-confidence(CS), and homesickness (HS) based on the item content, item response, exploratory and confirmative factor analysis. Total score was estimated with higher score indicating greater level of acculturative stress. The Cronbach alpha was 0.93.

Depression

Depression was measured using the 10-item Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)40. A four-point Likert scale was used to assess individual items with 0 (rarely or none of the time, or less than1 day) to 3 (most of the time or 5–7 days). Two items were reversely coded, and total scores were computed with higher scores indicating greater depression. The Cronbach alpha was 0.70.

Demographic variables and covariates

Demographic variables and other covariates in the study included age (in years), gender (male/female), place of origin (Asia/Africa/others), marital status (unmarried/married/divorced /separated/others; and was categorized into unmarried/others), education (undergraduate /graduate), religion (Christian/Muslim/Hinduism or Buddhism/Judaism/ no religion/others), duration in China (in months; and was categorized into one year or less/more than one year), major area (sciences/language and art/medicine/business/law/others), if like the major (don’t like/don’t know/like), level of preparedness before coming to China (not well/well), number of roommates (0/1/2/3 or more), study time in weekdays/weekends (0-2 hours/3-4 hours/5-6 hours/> 6 hours).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analyses (e.g., frequency, mean, standard deviation) were used to describe the sample characteristics. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the frequency of four acculturation strategies across different covariates. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the associated factors of four acculturation strategies with marginalization as reference group. The covariates with p value less than 0.1 in the Chi-square test were included in the multinomial logistic regression analysis. Linear regression was used to investigate the associations between acculturation strategies with acculturative stress and depression when controlling for covariates. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Sample characteristics

Among the total 567 participants, 336 (59.26%) were males with mean age of 22.75 (SD=4.11) years (Table 1). 84.24% of participants came from Africa or Asia, and 89.30% were unmarried. 76.32% of participants were undergraduate students, and the average time of living in China was 14.45 months (SD=12.11). Christian (35.77%) and Muslim (32.92%) were the most common religious beliefs. Literature/Art and Medicine were the top two majors with 80% of the students liked their major, and 72.69% were well prepared. 24.12% were living alone, and half and one third of them were studying 5 or more hours during weekdays and weekends, respectively.

View this table:
Table 1.

Characteristics of the study sample

Acculturation strategies

Table 2 shows that the proportion of marginalization, integration, assimilation and separation strategy were 28.92%, 31.57%, 17.54%, and 21.87%, respectively. Gender (χ2=21.61, p<0.001), religion (P<0.001*), major (χ2=38.94, p<0.001), if like the major (χ2=13.23, p=0.04), preparedness for studying in China (χ2=8.21, p=0.04), number of roommates (χ2=18.78, p=0.03), daily studying time in weekday (χ2=25.74, p=0.002) were significantly associated with the acculturation strategies.

View this table:
Table 2. Associated factors of acculturation strategies among international students in China

Associated factors of acculturation strategies

Results in Table 3 show that compared with males, female students were more likely to choose separation strategy (OR=1.86, 95% CI = [1.03, 3.35]). Students with Christian (OR =2.61, 95% CI = [1.01, 6.79]), Muslim (OR =4.55, 95% CI = [1.65, 12.53]), and Buddhist/Hindu (OR =3.57, 95% CI = [1.20, 10.65]) had higher likelihood to choose integration strategy. Students majoring in Literature/Art (OR=3.00, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.59]) were more likely to use assimilation strategy, while students who like their own major preferred to utilize assimilation strategy. Integration strategy was often applied by the students whose daily studying time were 3-4 hours (OR=2.83, 95% CI = [1.28, 6.30]), 5-6 hours (OR=3.65, 95% CI = [1.47, 9.08]), >6 hours (OR=3.99, 95% CI = [1.70, 9.39]) in weekday and 3-4 hours (OR=1.94, 95% CI = [1.00, 3.79]) in weekend.

View this table:
Table 3.

Multinomial logistic regression of acculturation strategies and associated factors, Odds Ratio [95% CI].

Effects of acculturation strategies on acculturative stress and depression

Results in Table 4 show that compared with international students with marginalization strategy, those with separation (β=11.08, p<0.001) and integration (β=6.66, p<0.05) had higher acculturative stress. Individuals with separation strategy were more likely to have higher stress in homesickness (β=3.14, p<0.001), value conflicts (β=1.77, p<0.001), mistreat (β=1.18, p<0.05), lack of cultural competence (β=1.75, p<0.001) and lack of self-confidence (β=1.34, p<0.05), while students with assimilation had higher value conflicts than marginalization (β=1.08, p<0.05), and students with integration had higher homesickness (β=1.69, p<0.001), value conflicts (β=1.40, p<0.001) and lack of cultural competence (β=1.04, p<0.05).

View this table:
Table 4.

Associations between acculturation strategies with mental health status among international students in China, regression coefficients (β)

Discussion

This study applied Berry’s acculturation framework7, 9 to examine acculturation strategies of international students in China. Four acculturation strategies, including marginalization, separation, assimilation and integration, were measured. The study investigated the associated factors of the four strategies and the associations between the four strategies and mental health status among international students. Findings of the study provided information to understand the acculturation strategies, and provide evidence in developing future effective interventions on mental health among international students.

Acculturation strategies among international students in China

Our findings reveal that integration was the most popular strategy among international students, consistent with previous studies in different countries, including China42, Japan43, Belgium15 and the United States13. Multicultural society has been gradually forming and played an important role in choice of integration strategy15, 44, 45. Assimilation was the least preferred strategy and less than one third of participants abandoned their heritage culture and actively participated in Chinese culture. One possible explanation was that the development of cultural values is subtle, and it would be difficult to modify or abandon specific cultures46. Another possible reason was that most international students prefer to return to their home countries after completing their short-term studies in China. Thus, they are less likely to change their values15. Marginalization and separation were found to be the moderate preferred strategies in our study, which were in line with the previous studies43, 47.

Acculturation strategies and associated factors

The study investigated the associated factors of the four acculturation strategies, and identified six significant factors, including gender, religion, major, preference of major, daily studying time in weekday and weekend. Relative to males, females were more likely to choose separation strategy. Females tend to build stronger co-national ties, whose primary social network was the friendships with people from the same home country15. More domestic cultural contacts than international exchanges may lead to higher likelihood of adopting separation strategy.

International students majoring in Literature/Art, liking their own major were more likely to prefer the strategy of assimilation. Students majoring in Literature/Art had higher aesthetic taste, imaginative thinking, and historical logic, and were more knowledgeable in history, culture, politics, society, etc. The skills and knowledge might play important roles in cross-cultural contacts48. In addition, compared with students majoring in Science, Liberal Arts students had higher intercultural competence, including more intercultural communication, more confidence in dealing with situational diversities, and more likelihood to show active attitude toward various cultures49. Students majoring in Literature/Art were also often characterized with higher cultural awareness. They studied Chinese language and cultural arts so as to comprehensively understand Chinese culture. Therefore, they will actively participate in the culture of China and enjoy the fun during their limited study time.

Students with religions of Christian, Muslim, and Buddhist/Hindu were more likely to prefer integration strategy than marginalization. China is a multi-religious country with five major religions, including Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism and Christianity50. There are more than 100 million people with religions, more than 85,000 places for religious activities, and over 3,000 religious groups in China50. Laws in China give people the freedom and respect of religious beliefs. International students with various religions could maintain their religion while simultaneously enjoy the Chinese culture.

Findings of the study also show that students with more time on study in weekdays were more likely to be integrated in both cultures. The students spending more time on study in weekday may actively participate in the curriculum practice and maintain interactions with teachers and classmates to improve their academic achievements. Meanwhile, these students may gather more social support through the social networks developed in the process of learning and interpersonal communication with Chinese students and local people51. Furthermore, it was also beneficial in improving Chinese language and deepening the understanding of Chinese culture52.

Effects of acculturation strategies on mental health status

Findings of the study indicate that relative to marginalization strategy, international students with separation strategy had higher level of acculturative stress, particularly higher in homesickness, value conflict, mistreated, lack of cultural competence and lack of self-confidence. It was consistent with previous studies that individuals who separate themselves from the host culture were more likely to experience a higher level of cultural stress35.

Individuals who applied separation strategy tend to perceive greater cultural distance53, which in turn may lead to higher acculturative stress and more homesickness54, 55. On the other hand, findings of the study show that students with integration strategy also had higher level of acculturative stress and its components, including homesickness, value conflicts and lack of cultural competence. The results were contrary to previous studies among immigrants that people with integration strategy had the lowest acculturative stress4, 7. The underlying mechanism of the different results would be complicated. One possible reason was that international students, unlike immigrants, arrived in the host country for a short period of time. Previous studies have reported that individuals often experience higher acculturative stress in the first two years of immigration56, 57. In this study, 72.31% of international students have lived in China for only one year or less. During the process of integration, poor language communication and insufficient cultural integration may trigger different aspects of cultural conflicts, especially value conflicts. International students often feel homesickness after leaving home58, however, homelessness may also become stressful when the lack of cultural competence and value conflict happened5, 39.

Limitations

There were limitations in the study. Firstly, it was a cross-sectional study. Longitudinal studies are needed in the future to examine the causal relationships of international students’ acculturation strategies with mental health. Secondly, the study was conducted with international students in Wuhan City. Cautions are needed when generalizing the results to the international students of the whole nation. Thirdly, data of this study were self-reported. Recall bias and social undesirability could not be ruled out.

Conclusions

Integration is the most popular acculturation strategy among international students in China. Students with separation and integration strategy had worse mental health status. Gender, major, religion, daily study time were significantly associated with the preference of acculturation strategies. Finding in the study deepened our understanding of acculturation strategy among international students in China, and provided evidence for developing future effective interventions to prevent the mental health in this special population.

Data Availability

The data can be available by requeat from researchers.

Acknowledgments

The study conception and design were thought by Chenchang Xiao and Bin Yu. Data collection was conducted by Chenchang Xiao, Jingyan Yan, Hanjia Li, Changmian Ding and Bin Yu. Data analysis was conducted by Chenchang Xiao and Jingyan Yan. Drafting of manuscript was conducted by Chenchang Xiao, Jingyan Yan, Hanjia Li and Changmian Ding. Review of the manuscript was conducted by Bin Yu.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Yusoff YM. Self-Efficacy, Perceived Social Support, and Psychological Adjustment in International Undergraduate Students in a Public Higher Education Institution in Malaysia. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2012; 16:353–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Oecd. Education at a glance 2017: OECD Publishing; 2017.
  3. 3.↵
    Rienties B, Luchoomun D, Tempelaar D. Academic and social integration of Master students: a cross-institutional comparison between Dutch and international students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2014; 51:130–41.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Smith RA, Khawaja NG. A review of the acculturation experiences of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2011; 35:699–713.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Yu B, Chen X, Li S, Liu Y, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Yan H. Acculturative stress and influential factors among international students in China: A structural dynamic perspective. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e96322.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Yu B, Chen XG, Li SY. Globalization, acculturative stress and their impact on health. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2014; 35:338–41.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Berry J. Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2005; 29:697–712.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    LaFromboise T, Coleman HLK, Gerton J. Psychological impact of biculturalism: evidence and theory. Psychol Bull. 1993; 114:395–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Berry J, Sabatier C. Variations in the assessment of acculturation attitudes: Their relationships with psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2011; 35:658–69.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Berry J, Sabatier C. Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2010; 34:191–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Kim E. Multidimensional acculturation attitudes and depressive symptoms in Korean Americans. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009; 30:98–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Neto F. Acculturation strategies among adolescents from immigrant families in Portugal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2002; 26:17–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Fosados R, McClain A, Ritt-Olson A, Sussman S, Soto D, Baezconde-Garbanati L, et al. The influence of acculturation on drug and alcohol use in a sample of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2007; 32:2990–3004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Tartakovsky E. Factors affecting immigrants’ acculturation intentions: A theoretical model and its assessment among adolescent immigrants from Russia and Ukraine in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2012; 36:83–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Cao C, Zhu C, Meng Q. Predicting Chinese international students’ acculturation strategies from socio-demographic variables and social ties. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2017; 20:85–96.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Ünlü Ince B, Fassaert T, de Wit MAS, Cuijpers P, Smit J, Ruwaard J, et al. The relationship between acculturation strategies and depressive and anxiety disorders in Turkish migrants in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14:252.
  17. 17.↵
    De Verthelyi RF. International students’ spouses: Invisible sojourners in the culture shock literature. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1995; 19:387–411.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Poyrazli S, Kavanaugh PR. Marital status, ethnicity, academic achievement, and adjustment strains: The case of graduate international students. College Student Journal. 2006; 40:767–80.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Wang J. A Study on Cross Cultural Adaptation of Indonesian Students at Anhui University [THESIS.MASTER]: Anhui University; 2014.
  20. 20.↵
    Needham BL, Mukherjee B, Bagchi P, Kim C, Mukherjea A, Kandula NR, et al. Acculturation strategies and symptoms of depression: the mediators of atherosclerosis in south Asians living in America (MASALA) study. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017; 20:1–7.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    Pan JY, Wong DFK. Acculturative stressors and acculturative strategies as predictors of negative affect among Chinese international students in Australia and Hong Kong: a cross-cultural comparative study. Acad Psychiatry. 2011; 35:376–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Yoon E, Chang C-T, Kim S, Clawson A, Cleary SE, Hansen M, et al. A meta-analysis of acculturation/enculturation and mental health. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2013; 60:15–30.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Behara J, Khan KA, Hasan B. Predicting effects of acculturation strategies on acculturative stress. IJPP. 2018; 9.
  24. 24.↵
    Morawa E, Erim Y. Acculturation and depressive symptoms among Turkish immigrants in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11:9503–21.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    Kaplan RC, Bangdiwala SI, Barnhart JM, Castañeda SF, Gellman MD, Lee DJ, et al. Smoking among U.S. Hispanic/Latino adults: the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014; 46:496–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    Lui PP, Zamboanga BL. Acculturation and alcohol use among Asian Americans: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018; 32:173–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Bai J. Perceived Support as a Predictor of Acculturative Stress Among International Students in the United States. . Journal of International Students. 2016; 6:93–106.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.
    Qin Y. A Study On The Cross Culture Adaption of Foreign Students in China [THESIS.MASTER]: SHENYANG AEROSPACE UNIVERSITY; 2017.
  29. 29.
    Rice KG, Choi C-C, Zhang Y, Morero YI, Anderson D. Self-Critical Perfectionism, Acculturative Stress, and Depression Among International Students. Couns Psychol. 2012; 40:575–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    Yang XY, Yang F. Acculturation Versus Cultural Retention: The Interactive Impact of Acculturation and Co-ethnic Ties on Substance Use Among Chinese Students in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018; 20:546–60.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.
    Lv N. The influence of enrolling overseas students on economic development in our country—from public financial impact view [THESIS.DOCTORAL]: Financial science research institute of the ministry of finance; 2015.
  32. 32.↵
    Ministry of E. The double increase in the service scale of studying abroad and returning to China. Ministry of Education of the People’s Repubic of China. 2018.
  33. 33.↵
    The Ministry of Education the People’s Republic of C. A statistic of Chinese international students in 2016. The Ministry of Education the People’s Republic of China. 2017.
  34. 34.↵
    Liu Y, Chen X, Li S, Yu B, Wang Y, Yan H. Path Analysis of Acculturative Stress Components and Their Relationship with Depression Among International Students in China. Stress Health. 2016; 32:524–32.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Berry J. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology. 1997; 42:5–34.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Johnson KL, Carroll JF, Fulda KG, Cardarelli K, Cardarelli R. Acculturation and self-reported health among Hispanics using a socio-behavioral model: the North Texas Healthy Heart Study. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:53.
  37. 37.
    Torres L, Driscoll MW, Voell M. Discrimination, acculturation, acculturative stress, and Latino psychological distress: a moderated mediational model. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2012; 18:17–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Ward C, Kennedy A. Acculturation strategies, psychological adjustment, and sociocultural competence during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1994; 18:329–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    Sandhu DS, Asrabadi BR. Development of an Acculturative Stress Scale for International Students: preliminary findings. Psychol Rep. 1994; 75:435–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1:385–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.
    Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994; 10:77–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Wang J. An Empirical Study on Correlation Factors and Acculturation Strategies of Asian Students in China [THESIS.MASTER]: Chongqing University; 2013.
  43. 43.↵
    Sun Y. Chinese students in Japan: the mediator and the moderator between their personality and mental health. Int J Psychol. 2012; 48:215–23.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Berry J, Kim U, Minde T, Mok D. Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review. 1987; 21:491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Van Oudenhoven JP, Prins KS, Buunk BP. Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1998; 28:995–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Gu Q. Maturity and Interculturality: Chinese students’ experiences in UK higher education. Eur J Education. 2009; 44:37–52.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Inoue T, Ito T. Acculturation attitudes and mental health of international students in their first year. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1997; 68:298–304.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    Zhang R. Study on the Social and Cultural Adaptation of Mongolian Students in China. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy & Social Science). 2017; 46:151–5.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    He S. Research on Status Quo and Countermeasures of Liberal Arts Students and Science Students’ Intercultural Communicative Competence [THESIS.MASTER]: Hunan University of Science and Technology; 2013.
  50. 50.↵
    National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference tN, Religious C. the religious profile of Chinese. Chinese Literature and History Publishing House 2008.
  51. 51.↵
    Akhtar M, Kröner-Herwig B. Acculturative Stress Among International Students in Context of Socio-Demographic Variables and Coping Styles. Curr Psychol. 2015; 34:803–15.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Kashima ES, Loh E. International students’ acculturation: Effects of international, conational, and local ties and need for closure. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2006; 30:471–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    Alcott YD, Watt SE. Acculturation Strategy and Racial Group in the Perception of Immigrants. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 2017; 11:1–16.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    Greenland K, Brown R. Acculturation and contact in Japanese students studying in the United Kingdom. J Soc Psychol. 2005; 145:373–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Suanet I, Van de Vijver FJR. Perceived cultural distance and acculturation among exchange students in Russia. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2009; 19:182–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    Gil AG, Vega WA. Two Different Worlds: Acculturation Stress and Adaptation among Cuban and Nicaraguan Families. J Soc Pers Relat. 1996; 13:435–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Cuellar I, Bastida E, Braccio SM. Residency in the United States, subjective well-being, and depression in an older Mexican-origin sample. J Aging Health. 2004; 16:447–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Saravanan C, Alias A, Mohamad M. The effects of brief individual cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and homesickness among international students in Malaysia. J Affect Disord. 2017; 220:108–16.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.
    Sussman S, Brannon BR, Dent CW, Hansen WB, Johnson CA, Flay BR. Relations of coping effort, coping strategies, perceived stress, and cigarette smoking among adolescents. Int J Addict. 1993; 28:599–612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top
Posted September 09, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Associated factors of acculturation strategies and mental health outcomes among international students in China
Chenchang Xiao, Jingyan Yan, Hanjia Li, Changmian Ding, Bin Yu
medRxiv 2024.09.08.24313277; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.08.24313277
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area