Diazinon residues levels in farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala of Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farm Improvement Project, Kenya

George Odoyo Oromo, Philip Okinda Owuor, Bowa Kwach, Peter Otieno
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313144

ABSTRACT

Pesticides use in vegetable production often has residual effects on the plants and environment with potential health risks. Diazinon, though associated with human health impacts, is a popular pesticide in the production of Brassica oleracea var. acephala at the Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farmers Improvement Project (KOSFIP), Kenya. The long preharvest interval (PHI) of diazinon application may not be observed by farmers with inadequate appreciation of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). It is not documented whether diazinon residues levels in the farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala of KOSFIP could be a health risk to the consumers. The diazinon residues levels and corresponding health risks in farm-gate Brassica oleracea var, acephala at KOSFIP were determined. Cross-sectional survey based on snowball sampling identified 40 farms applying diazinon on the vegetable. Triplicate samples were collected from each farm for residue analysis, using the QuEChERS method, and LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. Standard normal distribution function f(z), revealed ≈ 78% of farm-gate samples had detectable residual diazinon levels and 70% were above the Codex MRL of 0.05 mg/kg. The farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala are exposing consumers to health risks. Efforts must be intensified to ensure GAP are adopted. The estimated farm-gate samples with health risk indices for children and adults (HRIc and HRIA) >1.0 were 64% and 26%, respectively. Farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala diazinon levels are therefore causing high health risks to both children and adults. Farm-gate residual levels and HRI were comparatively higher than findings of most previous studies. Inappropriate label PHI and malpractices against GAP may be responsible for high residual levels. There should be regular surveillance and trainings of farmers on GAP for sustainable production of Brassica oleracea var. acephala in the Lake Victoria region. Use of diazinon on Brassica oleracea var. acephala should be discouraged and alternative approaches including integrated pest management practices should be encouraged.

INTRODUCTION

Pesticides enhance crop production for the increasing global population towards the realization of sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the United Nations (1,2). However, synthetic pesticides residues, magnified by malpractices in use, are ubiquitous contaminants in the environment (3–5). The residues pose serious to lethal health hazards to non-target organisms through inhalation, contact and ingestion of the contaminated foodstuffs (6,7). Approximately 30% (based on mass) of human food is of vegetable origin, mostly consumed raw or semi-processed. Vegetables can therefore be sources of pesticide residues to human beings more than other food groups (8) since most vegetable production uses various pesticides. Ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs is a major exposure route to pesticide residues (9). It is necessary that vegetables treated with pesticides during production are evaluated for pesticide residue safety levels to protect the consumers against food safety hazards and risks.

Brassica oleracea var. acephala is grown in many parts of the world (10,11) as food and for its numerous health benefiting metabolites that minimize the risk of degenerative diseases like cancer (6,12). However, cultivation of the vegetable involves application of pesticides for the management of pests and diseases that attack the roots and foliage (13–15). In Kenya, diazinon (O,O–diethyl–O- (2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl)phosphorothioate) is one of the broad-spectrum pesticides registered for use in Brassica oleracea var. acephala production (16). Diazinon is expected to undergo dissipation through chemical degradation processes and other forms of physical transformations including surface wash-off from the leaves. The total dissipation effect are expected to reduce diazinon residues to levels below the Codex maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.05 mg/kg when diazinon is applied according to good agricultural practices (GAP) (17).

Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farmers Improvement Project (KOSFIP) is an irrigation project located in Homa Bay County in the Republic of Kenya. The area is characterized by hot and humid climatic conditions with scanty rainfall of high variability in duration and amounts (18,19). High relative humidity of the location is due to close proximity to Lake Victoria and the irrigation water channels of the project. These conditions promote rapid spread of vegetable pests and diseases (20,21). The smallholder farmers manage the pests by use of synthetic pesticides. Though diazinon has been used by the smallholder farmers of Brassica oleracea var. acephala at KOSFIP, the long pre-harvest interval (PHI) of 12 days (16) may not be observed by the farmers (5). Consequently, it is possible that residues of diazinon in Brassica oleracea var. acephala grown in KOSFIP may be above Codex MRL. Unfortunately, farm and market gate basket screening of diazinon residues in the produce at KOSFIP is not documented. The diazinon residues in the farm gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala vegetables might be a health risk to the consumers. Consequently, a survey of diazinon residue levels in farm gate vegetables and the health risks the residue levels may pose were investigated. The survey results of farm gate diazinon residues in Brassica oleracea var. acephala vegetables are reported herein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

This study was carried out within the Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farmers Improvement Project (KOSFIP) site. KOSFIP is an irrigation project located in Rachuonyo (Kimira site) and Homa Bay (Oluch site) sub-counties of Homa Bay County in Kenya (Figure 1)(22). The site lies between latitudes 0° 20’ S and 0° 30’ S and longitudes 34° 30’ E and 34° 39’ E at an altitude of 1154 m above mean sea level along the shores of Lake Victoria (Figure 2)(23). Kimira site has an area of 1,790 ha out of which 808 ha have been developed into 44 farming blocks whilst Oluch site has an area of 1,308 ha with only 666 ha split into 53 farming blocks have been irrigated (19). The area is sub-humid with mean annual rainfall of between 740 and 1200 mm with short and long rainy seasons during April-May and November-December, respectively, and mean annual maximum temperatures of 310C and minimum of 180C (18,19). The relative humidity is significantly high ranging between 60 and 75% with potential evapotranspiration rate at 1800mm and 2000 mm per annum. Apart from the rains, the farms are irrigated, thereby producing vegetables throughout the year. The sites have fertile alluvial soils originating from the nutrient alluvial deposits washed downstream from the rivers and erosions from the Gusii highlands.

Research design

A cross-sectional survey design based on purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to identify forty-five farms of Brassica oleracea var. acephala that use diazinon in vegetable production. The survey was carried out during dry season (February to March, 2020) in both Kimira and Oluch sites of the project. During the period, Kimira site had 18 active blocks with Brassica oleracea var. acephala while Oluch had 35 sites. In addition, during sampling, Kimira site had 12 farms while Oluch had 33 farms. The criteria for snowballing included same vegetable variety treated with diazinon only at first harvest. Among the forty-five farms, 40 were selected (24). Kimira had 11 farms while Oluch had 29 farms. The farms were spread equitably to represent Kimira and Oluch sections of the project, considering all the 97 blocks making the project area. Sampling was biased to farms of Brassica oleracea var. acephala that had been treated with diazinon before the first harvest after planting. From every farm, 1 Kg of freshly harvested Brassica oleracea var. acephala, replicated three times were collected to make 120 samples.

Sample processing, preparation, extraction and partitioning

The processing, preparations, extraction and partitioning of the vegetable samples for diazinon residues analysis were carried out using Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) multi-residue method (25) as adopted and validated by the Analytical Chemistry Laboratories of Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Services (KEPHIS) method M0326 as follows.

Sample processing and preparation

The vegetable samples were coarsely cut with a knife then chopped and homogenized with a Hobart food processor. About 100 g of the homogenized samples were placed in sample containers and were then stored frozen at −18°C ± 5°C in readiness for extraction.

Extraction and partitioning of samples

A 10.0 ± 0.1 g of the homogenous wet samples and controls were weighed into 50 ml centrifuge tubes. The control samples were fortified with diazinon standard solution to achieve the 0.01µg/g for LC-MS/MS. Using an automatic pipette, 50 µl of procedural internal standards (dimethoate D6 (10 ppm) and malathion D10 (10 ppm)) were added to the contents of the centrifuge tubes. To the contents of the centrifuge tube, 10.0 ± 0.2 ml extraction solvent acetonitrile (MeCN) HPLC grade was added. The tube was immediately closed and shaken vigorously by Geno grinder for 1 minute at 1000 revolutions per minute (rpm). The resulting homogenous mixture in the centrifuge tube was then subjected to liquid-liquid partitioning step using 6.5 g of premixed extraction salts. The extraction salts comprised 4.0 ± 0.2 g magnesium sulphate anhydrous for removal of water and salting out MeCN; 1.0 ± 0.05 g sodium chloride to increase selectivity of analyte by reducing amount of co-extracted matrix; 1.0 ± 0.05 g trisodium citrate dihydrate and 0.5 ± 0.03 g disodium hydrogen citrate sesquihydrate as a citrate buffer for pH adjustment. The tube was closed and immediately shaken vigorously by hand to avoid caking. The mixture was again shaken by Geno grinder for 1 minute with 1000 rpm then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3700 rpm. An aliquot of 500 µl of the mixture was transferred into a 2.0 ml vial followed with 495 µl of HPLC grade water and 5 µl of injection internal standard dimethoate D6 (10 ppm). The mixture was vortexed to mix for LC-MS/MS analysis. The extracts were directly subjected to quantitative analysis by LC-MS/MS (dMRM) mode.

Preparation of calibration solutions

Calibration solutions were prepared using a control matrix containing no detectable residues of diazinon analytes. Using an automatic pipette, 4 ml of control blank was put into a 15 ml centrifuge tube followed with 4 ml of HPLC grade water and vortexed to mix. Reference standard solutions of diazinon pesticide stocked by KEPHIS were prepared for analysis at concentrations of 0.005 µg/ml, 0.01 µg/ml, 0.02 µg/ml, 0.05 µg/ml, 0.075 µg/ml, 0.1 µg/ml and 0.2 µg/ml for validation of method, and 0.005 µg/ml, 0.02 µg/ml, 0.05 µg/ml, and 0.2 µg/ml for routine analysis using the blank control.

Instrumentation and instrument specifications

The extracted samples of Brassica oleracea var. acephala were analysed using Liquid Chromatography Quadruple Agilent 6430 LC-MS/MS (HPLC) with standard electron spray ionization (ESI). The HPLC column used was C-18 with an internal diameter of 1.8 µm and a length of 50 cm. The optimization parameters, including solvent gradient, precursor and product ions, and retention times were set as outlined in method M0326. The column temperature was set at 40.0°C. The auto-sampler injection and ejection speed was 200µL/min with an injection volume of 3.00 µL

Quality control

The 2018 Standard Operating Principles (SOP) number M0326 for QuEChERS Multi-Residue Method for Analysis of Pesticides Residues (25) in high water matrices validated by Analytical Chemistry Laboratory of KEPHIS was used in the determination of residue levels. The quality parameters included repeatability, linearity, accuracy of recovery, method’s limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ). Calibration curves were drawn according to analyte ranges of concentration and response to the LC-ESI-MS/MS. This was achieved by using five replicates of different concentrations diluted with blank extract samples. Evaluations of accuracy and precision parameters were done by recovery experiments (recovery range of 93 – 123%) in which each analyte standard were spiked with blank Brassica oleracea var. acephala slurry in six replicates. The replicates were prepared separately at three different concentrations of 10, 20 and 50 μg Kg-1. Limits of detection (LODs) of each analyte was validated by comparing the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio magnitude to the background noise obtained from blank sample in the six replicates that presented mean coefficient of variations (CV) of less than 20%. The time window for the signal – to - noise (S/N) ratio was set at t < 2 minutes. LOD was calculated using the mathematical expression (26): Embedded Image The limits of quantification (LOQs), defined as the minimum concentration of an analyte that can be identified and quantified with 99% confidence, was calculated using the mathematical expression (26): Embedded Image

Analytical determination of residual diazinon

For quantitative analysis of the analytes, 3 µl of the solvent, matrix control, calibration standards and spikes, and samples were injected into the LC-MS/MS instrument. Responses were recorded for both internal standards and samples. A calibration curve of responses against concentration of calibration standards was obtained. The results of concentrations of residues of diazinon for all the samples were calculated from responses obtained from the calibration curve. Respective chromatograms and graphics for quantitation and confirmation were obtained.

Statistical analysis

The cross-sectional survey data of diazinon residues in farm gate samples were subjected to descriptive statistics for purposes of illustrating measures of central tendency and dispersion: mean concentrations, mode, median, quartiles, standard deviations, minimum and maximum values, range of values and the coefficient of variations (CV). The diazinon residues levels were also compared with Codex MRL values of 0.05 mg/kg and evaluated for health risk assessment. For both residue levels and health risk indices, the standard normal distribution function f(z) was used to determine the proportion of values that lie below and above the tolerable values of MRL and HRI. The values were computed using the formula: Embedded Image Where z is the standard proportion value; x is the acceptable value; µ is the mean of the data set; and, σ is the standard deviation of the data set.

Residual Pesticide Health Risk Assessment

The residual pesticide health risk indices (HRI) estimations for children (HRIC) and for adults (HRIA) based on the farm gate samples were estimated using the European Union formula (27): Embedded Image Where; HRI is the health risk index; EDI is the estimated daily intake of the pesticide; and ADI is the acceptable daily intake of the pesticide.

The EU formula provides that the EDI be determined by multiplying the sample residual pesticide concentration (mg/kg) by the estimated WHO food consumption rate (kg/day), and dividing by the number of the estimated WHO average body weight (28). HRI > 1.0 were considered as posing health risks hence not safe for human health. HRI ≤ 1.0 were considered not posing immediate health risks and thus safe for human health (29,30). The average daily vegetable intake for an adult of average weight 60 Kg was considered to be 0.345 Kg/person/day while children average daily intake was considered to be 0.232 kg/person/day for average body weight of 10 kg (31). The maximum acceptable daily intake (ADI) was considered to be 0.003 mg/kg body weight while the acute reference dose (ARfD) was 0.03 mg/kg body weight (32).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Quantification of levels of diazinon residues in the farm-gate baskets of Brassica oleracea var. acephala from the KOSFIP area of Homa Bay County for health risk assessment

Analysis of diazinon residues in the farm-gate Brassica oleracea var, acephala samples (Table 1) using the standard normal distribution function (f(z)) showed that 78% of all the samples had detectable levels of residual diazinon while 22% had non-detectable levels. Similarly, the percentage of farm gate samples with higher residues of diazinon than the acceptable 0.05 mg/kg was 70%. The findings were comparatively higher than levels reported by similar studies in Ghana (31), Nigeria (34) and other parts of Kenya (33,35), that reported trace levels of diazinon residues with less than 10% of the samples being above the Codex MRL.

View this table:
Table 1: Levels of diazinon residues in farm-gate baskets of Brassica oleracea var. acephala from selected KOSFIP blocks and resultant EDI and HRI for children and adults.

The measures of central tendency (mean, median and mode) displayed a positively skewed distribution with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 122% (Table 2). The distribution demonstrated that the residues levels of diazinon in farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala were highly variable with a large range. The variability could be as a result of multiple factors associated with inadequate training of farmers on good agricultural practices and poor surveillance by respective national authorities (38). Consequently, farmers in KOSFIP area require regular surveillance and training on use of diazinon. The findings also suggest that the recommended diazinon application conditions of rates and pre-harvest intervals may be too short and not suitable for the study area. In addition, the findings suggest that KOSFIP farm-gate vegetables need thorough washing before cooking to reduce the leaf surface residual levels on the vegetables. The data set (Table 1) had no outliers. Corresponding measures of central tendency and dispersion derived from the data set are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
Table 2: Measures of central tendency and dispersion for levels of diazinon residues in farm-gate baskets of Brassica oleracea var. acephala from KOSFIP area and resultant EDI and HRI for children and adults.

Given that food safety standards encourage infinitesimal residual levels of pesticide residues (17), a positively skewed distribution with all measures of dispersion falling below Codex MRL (0.05 mg/kg) would be most preferable. However, the findings of this study demonstrate mean residual diazinon concentrations much higher than Codex MRL. As a result, the high diazinon residues levels in the farm gate samples may pose health risks to consumers. Subsequently, most of the farm gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala vegetables treated with diazinon at KOSFIP may not therefore be safe for human consumption. The standard normal distribution function (f(z)) for the health risk indices showed that approximately 64% of the samples could pose health risks to children. Similarly, approximately 26% of the samples could pose health risks to adults. The findings indicate that children consuming Brassica oleracea var. acephala from the study area may be more at risk than adults. These findings were similar to the levels reported in some vegetables of Bangladesh (39), Kuwait (40), Nigeria (41), Ghana (42) and Sudan (43), where over 30% of samples reported residue levels above the Codex MRLs. The estimated daily intake (EDIC) and resulting health risk indices for children (HRIC) indicate that children consuming the vegetable from the study area have higher chances of developing diazinon related health problems (44,45). Given that data on residual levels with computed EDI and HRI for children are not available, comparisons of health risk factors for children in different regions have not been done.

On the other hand, the estimated daily intake for adults (EDIA) and resultant health risk index for adults (HRIA) were comparatively lower than ratios for children (Table 1 and Table 2). The findings were similar to residual levels of diazinon in cauliflower of Bangladesh (46), tomatoes of Spain (47) and Iran (48), respectively. The effect of the residual levels of diazinon on EDI and HRI for adults were higher than the findings in Chinese kale (49), spring onion, parsley onion and ginger vegetables in Thailand (50). In addition, the results were also higher than those reported for yard long bean in Bangladesh (46), apple in Pakistan (51), T. occidentalis and C.argentea in Nigeria (34), Brassica oleracea var. acephala (35,37) and tomatoes (Ngolo et al., 2019) in Kenya.

However, the results and the resultant EDI and HRI were lower than ratios reported on eggplant and tomatoes in Pakistan (39,52), watermelon (41), spinach and onions (53) in Nigeria, tomatoes in Ghana (33), cucumber and tomatoes in Sudan (43). Given the high variability displayed (coefficient of variation (C.V.) of 122%), the farmers and consumers of the vegetables are likely to be exposed to diazinon associated health risks (54). These health challenges may threaten human population in the study area. On the same note, though the adults have a lower mean ratio of 0.559, continuous consumption of this popular vegetable may cumulatively raise the exposure levels and result in devastating health impacts (55).

The presence of inappropriate levels of diazinon residues in the leaves of Brassica oleracea var. acephala may be a consequence of non-adherence to good agricultural practices (GAPs) such as failing to observe the application conditions of dosage and pre-harvest intervals. Such disregard are popular with smallholder farmers in developing countries for locally consumed vegetables (5,15,56) and in regions where surveillance and monitoring activities are inadequate. The unacceptable residue levels could be due to inability of the farmers to interpret the rates as prescribed on the labels or utter disregard of the rates, and inadequate surveillance of farmers on the use of pesticides. Inappropriate levels may also be attributed to inability of the farmers in the study area to consider other viable methods of pest control provided by Integrated Pest Management (IPM) guidelines (40,57) during heavy infestations. To manage the unacceptable residue levels and related health problems, training of farmers on GAP and alternatives to chemical pest control should be initiated in the study area. National regulatory agencies should equally strengthen surveillance on farmers with emphasis on observance of pre-harvest intervals and pesticide dosages. The general public should also be sensitized on the need to reduce the risks through proper culinary processing of the vegetables before consuming them. Lastly, the inappropriate residue levels may result from label application conditions which were extrapolated from field trials done in other regions but not suitable for the study area. It is therefore well justified to constantly monitor residual levels of diazinon in the vegetable and to develop pesticide safety level monitoring policies to mitigate resultant health problems due to unacceptable residue levels.

In conclusion, the findings in this study showed that most of the farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala treated with diazinon within the KOSFIP area of Homa Bay County of Kenya had higher than tolerable residue levels. The residual diazinon quantities may pose significant health risks to the consumers. The high levels suggested that most farmers of Brassica oleracea var. acephala who use diazinon within the KOSFIP area may not be observing good agricultural practices (GAPs). Consequently, there is need to restrict use of diazinon on Brassica oleracea var. acephala at KOSFIP and to consider alternative pesticides with shorter PHIs to reduce high levels of residual diazinon in farm gate vegetables. In addition, there is need for a survey study into the extent of good agricultural practices (GAPs) with respect to pesticide use in the production of Brassica oleracea var. acephala and other vegetables within the KOSFIP area of Homa Bay County. On the same note, there is need for health risk index (HRI) determination for various age groups with estimated local weights, consumption rates and pesticide safety levels (PSL) adapted to the local environment. Finally, there is need for a comparative study on the effects of processing (washing, blanching, cooking) to establish if such processing methods significantly reduces diazinon residue levels in Brassica oleracea var. acephala of KOSFIP area.

This study has provided baseline information required for the establishment of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) towards sustainable use of diazinon in production of Brassica oleracea var. acephala in the KOSFIP area. The study has provided a basis for discouraging the use of diazinon in the production of Brassica oleracea var. acephala in KOSFIP and other environments.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate Lillian Cherono of KOSFIP for her support as an agronomist, and Joab Oloo Onyango for provision of experimental plots within the KOSFIP scheme. In addition, the authors acknowledge the management of Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Services (KEPHIS), and the KEPHIS Analytical Chemistry Laboratories technical team at Karen - Nairobi: Onesmus Mwniki, Lucy Nyamu, Samwel Maiyo, Edmond Momanyi, Aeline Kiptum, James Njenga, and Robert Njuguna Koigi. Finally, we appreciate the members of Prof Owuor’s research group and Dr. Charles Ochieng for their critique to the thought processes.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    FAO. Sustainable Development Goals: Working for Zero Hunger. Transforming food and agriculture to achieve the SDGs [Internet]. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018. Available from: http://www.fao.org/
  2. 2.↵
    Pandya IY. Pesticides and their applications in agriculture. Asian J Appl Sci Technol. 2018;2(2):894–900.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Botwe BO. Organochlorine pesticide residues contamination of Ghanaian market vegetables. J Environ Issues Agric Dev Ctries. 2007;3(2):1–6.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.
    Hanson R, Dodoo DK, Essumang DK, Blay J, Yankson K. The effect of some selected pesticides on the growth and reproduction of fresh water Oreochromis niloticus, Chrysicthys nigrodigitatus and Clarias gariepinus. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Nov;79(5):544–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Kiwango P, Kassim N, Kimanya M. Pesticide residues in vegetables: Practical interventions to minimize the risk of human exposure in Tanzania. Curr J Appl Sci Technol [Internet]. 2018 Feb 22;26(1):1–18. Available from: http://www.sciencedomain.org/abstract/23292
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sanchez-Bayo F,
    2. Brink PJ,
    3. Mann RM
    Francisco SB. Impacts of agricultural pesticides on terrestrail ecosystems. In: Sanchez-Bayo F, Brink PJ, Mann RM, editors. Ecological Impacts of Toxic Chemicals. Sydney, Australia: Bentham Science Publishers. Sydney, Australia; 2011.
  7. 7.↵
    Juraske R, Mutel CL, Stoessel F, Hellweg S. Life cycle human toxicity assessment of pesticides: Comparing fruit and vegetable diets in Switzerland and the United States. Chemosphere [Internet]. 2009 Nov;77(7):939–45. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045653509009497
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Claeys WL, Schmit JFF, Bragard C, Maghuin-Rogister G, Pussemier L, Schiffers B. Exposure of several Belgian consumer groups to pesticide residues through fresh fruit and vegetable consumption. Food Control [Internet]. 2011 Mar;22(3–4):508–16. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0956713510003294
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    WHO. Pesticide residues in food and feed [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. Geneva. http://www.codexalimentarius.net; 2015 [cited 2018 Jun 15]. 1–76 p. Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net
  10. 10.↵
    Šamec D, Urlić B, Salopek-Sondi B. Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) as a superfood: Review of the scientific evidence behind the statement. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr [Internet]. 2019 Aug 22;59(15):2411–22. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2018.1454400
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    USDA. Vol. 1, United States Department of Agriculture. 2014 [cited 2018 May 7]. p. 339 Census of Agriculture 2012. Available from: www.nass.usda.gov.
  12. 12.↵
    Rosa E, Heany R. Seasonal variation in protein, mineral and glucosinolate composition of Portuguese cabbages and kale. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;57:111–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Seif AA, Nyambo B. Integrated pest management for Brassica production in East Africa. 2013. 80 p.
  14. 14.
    Sarah M, Maina M. Vegetables in East Africa: Farming Resources Series. Nairobi, Kenya: Elewa Publications, Nairobi.; 2008.
  15. 15.↵
    FAO. Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) on horticultural production for extension staff in Tanzania. Training manual [Internet]. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010. 1–178 p. (GAP Working Paper Series). Available from: http://www.fao.org
  16. 16.↵
    Pest Control Products Board. Pest Control Products Board [Internet]. 11th ed. List of Registered Products for use in Kenya. 10th Edition. Pest Control Products Board, Nairobi.; 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 4]. 1–404 p. Available from: www.pcpb.or.ke
  17. 17.↵
    FAO. Departmental Program on Food and Nutritional Security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2007 [cited 2018 Jan 5]. p. 1–60 Guidelines “‘Good Agricultural Practices for Family Agriculture.’” Available from: www.fao.org
  18. 18.↵
    Jaetzold R, Schmidt H, Hormetz B, Shisanya C. Farm Managemnt Handbook of Kenya. Volume II. 2nd ed. Nairobi, Kenya: Continental Graphics; 2009.
  19. 19.↵
    Government of Kenya & African Development Fund. Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farmers Improvement Project Appraisal Report [Internet]. Nairobi, Kenya: Agriculture and rural development, African Development Fund, Nairobi.; 2006. 1–71 p. Available from: http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/KE-
  20. 20.↵
    Cilas C, François-Régis G, Babin R, Avelinop J. Tropical crop pests and diseases in a climate change setting— A few examples. In: Climate change and agriculture worldwide [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands; 2016. p. 73–82. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_6
  21. 21.↵
    Nurhayati D. Climate change, environment and plant diseases development. In: International Seminar Exploring Potential Research Department of Plant Pests and Diseases Agriculture Faculty, Sriwijaya University Palembang, Indonesia. Palembang, Indonesia: Department of Plant Pest and Disease, Agriculture Faculty, Sriwijaya University; 2011. p. 200–5.
  22. 22.↵
    Makone, Samson M, Bunyatta, David K, Maobe, Samson N, Basweti, Evans A. Influence of selected socio-economic factors on crop productivity under irrigated agriculture among Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farmers of Homa Bay County, Kenya. Int J Res Soc Sci Humanit [Internet]. 2020;01(05):10–26. Available from: https://www.ijrss.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/43/34
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Opere AO, Njogu AK. Using extreme value theory to estimate available water in the upper Awach-Kibuon catchment in Nyamira County, Kenya. Am J Water Resour [Internet]. 2020 Sep 2;8(4):200–10. Available from: http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajwr/8/4/6/index.html
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Krejcie R V., Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 1970 Sep 2;30(3):607–10. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316447003000308
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J Assoc Off Agric Chem Int. 2003;86:412–31.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wenzl T,
    2. Haedrich J,
    3. Schaechtele A,
    4. Robouch P,
    5. Stroka J
    European Union. Guidance document on the estimation of LOD and LOQ for measurements in the field of contaminants in feed and food. Wenzl T, Haedrich J, Schaechtele A, Robouch P, Stroka J, editors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Joint research Centre Technical Reports; 2016. 1–58 p.
  27. 27.↵
    European Union. Pesticide Database. Maximum residue levels as determined by EC regulation 396/2005 [Internet]. European Community; 2005 [cited 2019 Jun 20]. Available from: http://ec.europa.ec/food/plant/pesticides/legislation/max_residue_levels.en.htm
  28. 28.↵
    WHO & FAO. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, Geneva.; 2009. 1–752 p. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207233.2010.549617
  29. 29.↵
    Darko G, Akoto O. Dietary intake of organophosphorus pesticide residues through vegetables from Kumasi, Ghana. Food Chem Toxicol [Internet]. 2008 Dec;46(12):3703–6. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278691508005462
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    WHO. Measuring Intake of Fruit and Vegetables. Background Paper for the FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 1–40 p.
  31. 31.↵
    Wang X, Sato T, Xing B, Tao S. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350(1– 3):28–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    FAO & WHO. Pesticide residues in food 2016. Report of the special session of the joint meeting of the FAO panel of experts on pesticide residues in food and the environment and the WHO core assessment group on pesticide residues. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.fao.org
  33. 33.↵
    Bempah C, Asomaning J, Boateng J. Market basket survey for some pesticides residues in fruits and vegetables from Ghana. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2012;2(3):850– 71.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Njoku KL, Ezeh CV, Obidi FO, Akinola MO. Assessment of pesticide residue levels in vegetables sold in some markets in Lagos State, Nigeria. Niger J Biotechnol [Internet]. 2017 Apr 24;32(1):53–60. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/njb/article/view/155268
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Karanja NK, Njenga M, Mutua GK, Lagerkvist CJ, Kutto E, Okello JJ. Concentrations of heavy metals and pesticide residues in leafy vegetables and implications for Peri-urban farming in Nairobi, Kenya. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev [Internet]. 2012 Oct 22;3(1):255–67. Available from: https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/152
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.
    MoALF. Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Series: Climate Risk Profile for Homa Bay County. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Nairobi, Kenya; 2016. p. 1–128.
  37. 37.↵
    Ngolo P, Nawiri M, Machocho A, Oyieke H. Pesticide residue levels in soil, water, kales and tomatoes in Ewaso Narok Wetland, Laikipia, County, Kenya. J Sci Res Reports [Internet]. 2019 Sep 23;24(5):1–11. Available from: http://journaljsrr.com/index.php/JSRR/article/view/30165
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    WHO & FAO. Global Situation of Pesticide Management in Agriculture and Public Health. Report of a 2018 WHO-FAO Survey. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland & Rome, Italy: World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization; 2019. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/ca5201en/ca5201en.pdf
  39. 39.↵
    Alam MN, Chowdhury M, Alamgir Z, Hossain MS, Mijanur R, Rahman MA, et al. Detection of residual levels and associated health risk of seven pesticides in fresh eggplant and tomato samples from Narayanganj District, Bangladesh. J Chem [Internet]. 2015;2015:1–7. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jchem/2015/243574/
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Jallow M, Awadh DG, Albaho MS, Devi VY, Thomas BM. Pesticide knowledge and safety practices among farm workers in Kuwait: Results of a survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2017 Mar 24;14(4):340–55. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/340
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Musa M, Akan JC, Zakari M, Naomi B. Assessment of organophosphorus and pyrethroid pesticide residues in watermelon (Citrulus lanatus) and soil samples from Gashua, Bade Local Government area Yobe State, Nigeria. J Environ Pollut Hum Heal. 2015;3(3):52–61.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Ato FA. Assessment of pesticide residues in vegetables at the farm gate: Cabbage (Brassica oleracea) cultivation in Cape Coast, Ghana. Res J Environ Toxicol [Internet]. 2011 Mar 1;5(3):180–202. Available from: http://www.scialert.net/abstract/?doi=rjet.2011.180.202
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    Awad OM, Adam AM, Ahmed MAH, Abd ES, Ishag EMET, Asia AD. Pesticide residues detected on tomato and cucumber fruits grown in greenhouse farms in Khartoum State, Sudan. Int J Life Sci Res. 2018;6(3):472–81.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Hancock DB, Martin ER, Mayhew GM, Stajich JM, Jewett R, Stacy MA, et al. Pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A family-based case-control study. BioMed Cent Neurol [Internet]. 2008 Dec 28;8(1):6. Available from: http://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2377-8-6
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pretty J
    Kishi M. The health impacts of pesticides: what do we now know? In: Pretty J, editor. The Pesticide Detox Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture. London: Earthscan, London; 2005. p. 23–38.
  46. 46.↵
    Sultan A, Rahman A, Begum A, Chowdhury AZ, Reza S. Multi insecticide residue analysis in vegetables collected from different regions of Bangladesh. Asian-Australisian J Biosci Biotechnol [Internet]. 2016;1(3):547–51. Available from: http://www.ebupress.com/journals/aajbb
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Fenoll J, Hellin P, Martinez C, Miguel M, Flores P. Multiresidue method for analysis of pesticides in pepper and tomato by gas chromatography with nitrogen–phosphorus detection. Food Chem [Internet]. 2007;105(2):711–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814607000556
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Rohani FG, Mahdavi V, Amina MM. Evaluation of diazinon and oxydemeton-methyl residues by GC/NPD in tomatoes grown in Kerman greenhouses. J Agric Sci Technol. 2017;19(1):113–29.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    Wanwimolruk S, Kanchanamayoon O, Phopin K, Prachayasittikul V. Food safety in Thailand 2: Pesticide residues found in Chinese kale (Brassica oleracea), a commonly consumed vegetable in Asian countries. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2015 Nov 1;532:447–55. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.114
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    Sapbamrer R, Hongsibsong S. Organophosphorus pesticide residues in vegetables from farms, markets, and a supermarket around Kwan Phayao Lake of Northern Thailand. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol [Internet]. 2014 Jul 8;67(1):60–7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00244-014-0014-x
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Asi MR. Solid-phase extraction and chromatographic determination of pesticides in food and water samples. Doctoral Dessertation. University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; 2003.
  52. 52.↵
    Latif Y, Sherazi STH, Bhanger MI. Assessment of pesticide residua in commonly used vegetables in Hyderabad, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Assessment of pesticide residues in commonly used vegetables in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf [Internet]. 2011;74(8):2299–303. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.07.030
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    Akan JC, Jafiya L, Mohamed Z, Abdulrahman FI. Organophosphorus pesticide residues in vegetable and soil samples from Alau Dam and Gongulong Agricultural Areas, Borno State, Nigeria. Int J Environ Monit Anal [Internet]. 2013;1(2):58–64. Available from: http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=162&doi=10.11648/j.ijema.20130102.14
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    Jallow M, Awadh DG, Albaho MS, Devi VY, Thomas BM. Pesticide risk behaviors and factors influencing pesticide use among farmers in Kuwait. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1;574:490–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969716320046
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Savage EP, Keefe TJ, Mounce LM, Heaton RK, Lewis JA, Burcar PJ. Chronic neurological sequelae of acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning. Arch Environ Heal An Int J [Internet]. 1988 Feb;43(1):38–45. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00039896.1988.9934372
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    FAO. Report of the FAO Internal Workshop on Good Agricultural Practices [Internet]. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2007. 1–42 p. (FAO GAP Working Paper Series). Available from: http://www.fao.org/prods/GAP/gapactivities_en.asp
  57. 57.↵
    Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Al-Khalil SI, Al-Jabi SW, et al. Knowledge and practices of pesticide use among farm workers in the West Bank, Palestine: safety implications. Environ Health Prev Med [Internet]. 2010 Jul 10;15(4):252–61. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12199-010-0136-3
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted September 09, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Diazinon residues levels in farm-gate Brassica oleracea var. acephala of Kimira-Oluch Smallholder Farm Improvement Project, Kenya
George Odoyo Oromo, Philip Okinda Owuor, Bowa Kwach, Peter Otieno
medRxiv 2024.09.05.24313144; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.24313144
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area