Abstract
Purpose This study evaluated the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and adverse events (AEs), including cardiovascular AEs and appendicitis, in US adults before the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. Real-world studies of AEs after COVID-19 suggest that diagnoses of AEs and COVID-19 frequently occur on the same day and may be a source of bias.
Methods Cohort and self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) designs were used in 2 US administrative claims data sources—Merative™ MarketScan® (ages 18-64 years) and Medicare (ages ≥ 65 years). AEs included stroke (nonhemorrhagic and hemorrhagic), acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis/pericarditis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unusual-site and common-site thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and appendicitis. In cohort analyses, weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) compared adults with a COVID-19 diagnosis and matched comparators. In SCRI analysis, relative incidences (RIs) and 95% CIs compared risk and reference windows within individuals. Analyses were performed starting follow-up on Time 0 and Day 1.
Results For cardiovascular AEs, all estimates starting follow-up on Day 1 were above 1.0 in both data sources. For cohort analyses, the strongest associations were for inpatient PE in both databases: MarketScan, HR=8.65 (95% CI, 6.06-12.35), Medicare HR=3.06 (95% CI, 2.88-3.26). For SCRI analyses, the strongest association in MarketScan was for DIC: RI=32.28 (95% CI, 17.06-61.09) and in Medicare was for myocarditis/pericarditis: RI=4.53 (95% CI, 3.89-5.27). AEs diagnosed concurrently with COVID-19 (ie, on Time 0) were common; including Time 0 in follow-up/risk windows resulted in higher RIs, as well as higher HRs for some AEs. However, some AEs (eg, stroke) were more common on Time 0 in the comparator group resulting in lower HRs.
Conclusion COVID-19 diagnoses had moderate to strong associations with cardiovascular AEs and weak or inconsistent associations with appendicitis, although estimates varied by design and methodology.
Competing Interest Statement
This study was funded by the US Food and Drug Administration as part of the FDA BEST Initiative. Acumen and RTI International are contractors of the BEST Initiative; IBM Consulting was a contractor of the BEST Initiative at the time of study conduct.
Clinical Protocols
https://bestinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BEST-Post-COVID-19-AE-Protocol_2023.pdf
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the US Food and Drug Administration as part of the FDA BEST Initiative. Acumen and RTI International are contractors of the BEST Initiative; IBM Consulting was a contractor of the BEST Initiative at the time of study conduct.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This surveillance activity was conducted as part of the FDA public health surveillance mandate and was not subject to Institutional Review Board oversight.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Affiliation at time of study
Source(s) of Support: US Food and Drug Administration
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the respective data holders (IBM Consulting, Acumen, LLC), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.
