ABSTRACT
Background Malaria Early Warning Systems(EWS) are predictive tools that often use climatic and environmental variables to forecast malaria risk and trigger timely interventions. Despite their potential benefits, the development and implementation of malaria EWS face significant challenges and limitations. We reviewed the current evidence on malaria EWS, including their settings, methods, performance, actions, and evaluation.
Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search using keywords related to EWS and malaria in various databases and registers. We included primary research and programmatic reports focused on developing and implementing Malaria EWS. We extracted and synthesized data on the characteristics, outcomes, and experiences of Malaria EWS.
Results After reviewing 5,535 records, we identified 30 studies from 16 countries that met our inclusion criteria. The studies varied in their transmission settings, from pre-elimination to high burden, and their purposes, ranging from outbreak detection to resource allocation. The studies employed various statistical and machine-learning models to forecast malaria cases, often incorporating environmental covariates such as rainfall and temperature. The most common mode used is the time series model. The performance of the models was assessed using measures such as the Akaike Information Criterion( AIC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and adjusted R squared(R 2). The studies reported actions and responses triggered by EWS predictions, such as vector control, case management, and health education. The lack of standardized criteria and methodologies limited the evaluation of EWS impact.
Conclusions This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of Malaria EWS, highlighting the progress, challenges, and gaps in the field. The review informs and guides policymakers, researchers, and practitioners in enhancing EWS and malaria control strategies. The review also underscores the need for further research on the integration, sustainability, and evaluation of Malaria EWS usage and harmonized methods to ease review.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
DM acknowledges the support of the Medical Research Council (MRC) through the MRC/DTP fellowship. The funding body had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study reviews previously published papers therefore, ethics approval was not required. It is assumed that the original authors obtained the necessary ethical approvals for their research. The PRISMA guidelines conducted this review
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors of the original studies upon reasonable request.
