Abstract
Background Job loss is related to morbidity and mortality, but generation of causal evidence is challenging due to confounding factors. Finland suffered a severe economic recession in the early 1990s with unemployment reaching almost 25%, with many job losses due to mass layoff or company closure. Such job displacements are assumed to be exogenous to the individual and create a natural experiment for causal inference.
Methods We evaluate the causal relationship between job displacement and mortality using register data from Finland between 1988-2020 (N=590,823 individuals [43·3 % female] aged 25-55 and securely employed by the private sector at baseline, N=93,199 total deaths by 2020).
Findings Job displacement is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality even after accounting for sex, age, marital status, and education (HR=1·09 [1·07, 1·10]). Risks of death by suicide, violence, alcohol, accidents, and disease are higher for displaced individuals at all follow-up periods examined. Risks of death from cancer and ischaemic heart disease are higher for displaced individuals only in later follow up periods.
Interpretation Our analyses support the causal influence of job displacement on all-cause and specific-cause mortality, even up to 30 years after the recession; this risk varies by cause of death and by length of follow-up. Future work should evaluate stress and substance use as potential pathways from job displacement to mortality.
Funding This work was supported by the Biology of Trauma Initiative at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and the Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics.
Evidence before this study Job loss and unemployment are stressful life events. We searched PubMed from database inception until August 24, 2024 with the search terms “(mortality) AND (job loss) OR (job displacement)” to identify research utilizing natural experiment job displacement designs to estimate the effect of job loss on all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality. No restrictions were applied to the language of publication or article type. We also reviewed references to identify additional relevant studies. Meta-analytic estimates indicate that job loss negatively influences mental and physical health and confers risk for mortality. That said, unemployment and health have a complex relationship, where poor health can increase likelihood of job loss, which then in turn worsens health; therefore, natural experiments are required for causal inference. Causally-informative studies of job loss suggest that job loss causally increases risk of all-cause mortality up to 20 years after job loss and some specific causes of death within 5-10 years after job loss.
Added value of this study This study expands the length of follow-up after job loss (up to 30 years) and evaluates a broader range of specific causes of death, such as violence. The long follow-up permits investigation into deaths resulting from diseases that develop over long periods of time, like heart disease and cancer.
Implications of all available evidence Job loss causally increases risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality and the risk of mortality from specific causes varies by duration after job loss, with external causes of death showing increased risk shortly after job loss and long-term illnesses like cancer or heart disease showing increased risk long after the job loss event. Substance use and stress are implicated as possible mechanisms for future research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Biology of Trauma Initiative at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. JK was supported by the Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics (grant 352792). See the following website for more information on the Biology of Trauma: https://www.broadinstitute.org/biology-trauma-initiative-broad-institute Role of Funding Sources: The funding sources contributed to data permit costs and researcher support, but not to study design, hypotheses, or manuscript preparation. We have not been paid by a pharmaceutical company or other agency to write this article. Authors were not precluded from accessing data in this study and we jointly accept responsibility to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research ethical board of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.