Abstract
Introduction Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) is a crucial intervention for malaria control, yet its acceptability in urban areas remains understudied, particularly in Luwingu District, Zambia. This research aimed to estimate acceptance of IRS and identify the factors associated with its acceptability in an urban setting of this area that has holoendemic transmission of malaria.
Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 344 households. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS. 28.0) included descriptive statistics and logistic regression to identify factors associated with IRS acceptability.
Results A total of 344 household heads were interviewed in this study, out of which only a third (93/344) were female. Among the surveyed households, 53.3% reported being sprayed with IRS, while 46.8% were not and the difference was not statistically significant. The analysis revealed several key factors influencing IRS acceptability. Age was found to be significant, with younger individuals more likely to accept IRS. Similarly, those in formal employment and those with good attitudes towards IRS were likely to accept IRS implementation. On the other hand, sex and marital status were not associated with IRS acceptability.
Conclusion This study found that Indoor Residual Spraying in an urban community of an area that has holoendemic transmission of malaria covered only about half of the households. The factors associated with acceptance of IRS included younger age group below 35 years compared to those aged 36 years and older, those in formal employment compared to those in informal employment and those with moderate and good attitudes towards IRS. On the other hand, sex, marital status and educational levels if the heads of the households were not statistically associated with acceptance of IRS implementation in their households.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Lusaka Apex Medical University Research Ethics Committee (Ethical Reference Number: 00746-24).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors