ABSTRACT
Introduction/background The heart is vital, and even minor dysfunctions can significantly impact the body. Cardiologists need always to determine heart size, which varies with physiological changes. Advanced measurement techniques are costly and often inaccessible to a common man. Measuring the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) via conventional X-ray is a common and more affordable option, but there’s a need for even cheaper alternatives
Objective To determine relationship between CTR and presenting clinical indications and to relate CTR to the body parameters to find an appropriate relationship that can be utilized in low resource facilities in determining heart size.
Methodology This cross-sectional study involved 386 patients undergoing chest radiographs at Mulago National Specialized Hospital’s radiology department. Data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Associations between the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and independent variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, simple linear regression, and multivariate regression. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of < 0.05.
Results The median cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) was 0.46, with an interquartile range of 0.42 to 0.50. Female patients had a higher CTR than males. Significant positive correlations were found between CTR; and BMI (p < 0.001, correlation 0.21), and BSA (p = 0.016, correlation 0.12), and BSI (p < 0.001, correlation 0.19). The diagnostic accuracy of a linear regression equation containing BSA as an estimator of CTR showed relatively fair performance compared to the linear regression equations with BSI and BMI. It showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 29.2%, 86.0%, 63.6%, and 59.0% for males, and 8.3%, 98.1%, 75.0%, and 60.7% for females, respectively.
Conclusion BSA shows a moderately good relationship with CTR, while the influence of body habitus on CTR is minimal. Thus, using body parameters to predict CTR should be approached cautiously. We recommend conducting a similar study on a more diverse general population
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Makerere University, School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical reasons. Data are available from the the PI (Nakatudde Rebecca) (contact via nakatudde777{at}yahoo.co.uk and +256788279049) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
