Abstract
Background The era of universal treatment for HIV has seen high rates of disengagement from antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs and re-engagement after interruptions, with modeled estimates of non-naïve initiators >50% in many places. Most re-engagers are reluctant to admit prior antiretroviral exposure, and non-self-reported data on proportions of re-initiators are scarce. We synthesized data from multiple sources to explore the proportion of people who present for initiation with evidence of prior ART use in South Africa.
Methods We enrolled a sequential sample of adults presenting to initiate ART or to re-initiate ART after an interruption >3 months and collected 1) self-reported previous treatment experience; 2) electronic medical record (EMR) evidence of prior ART clinic visits; 3) baseline blood tests for metabolites of tenofovir diphosphate; and 4) laboratory records indicating prior ART-related tests. Interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of clients who self-reported no prior ART use but had evidence of metabolites.
Results Among 89 enrolled participants (median age 32.5, 62% female), 16 (18%) self-reported previously taking ART >3 months prior to enrolment. An additional 33 (45%) who did not self-report prior exposure had EMR or laboratory evidence of prior ART use, for a total of 49 (55%) clients with known prior treatment exposure at initiation. Sensitivity of self-report was 40%, EMR 43%, metabolite testing 45%, and laboratory records 73%. Interviewees (n=11) reported opting to present as naive because they perceived that disclosure of prior disengagement would cause delays accessing treatment, require additional documentation, and elicit negative responses from healthcare workers. Study limitations included short duration of metabolite detectability (90 days), inability to link individuals within the EMR to discern ART experience at other facilities, and lack of baseline viral load testing.
Conclusions At least 55% of clients initiating ART in South Africa have prior treatment experience, but only a third of re-initiators voluntarily reveal this. Laboratory records, which reflect long-term experience, yielded the most accurate results for ascertaining prior treatment exposure. As numbers re-engaging in HIV care after a treatment interruption increase, understanding reluctance to self-report ART experience and exploring opportunities to overcome barriers are critical for preventing repeated interruptions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/7-119
Funding Statement
Funding for the study was provided the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through INV-031690 to Boston University. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Witwatersrand (M220440) and the Boston University IRB (H-42726) and by relevant Provincial Health Research Committees through the National Health Research Database in South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal: KZ_202207_014, Mpumalanga: MP_202207_004, Gauteng: GP_202207_049). The protocol is also registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05454839). All participants provided written informed consent for all data collection.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Disidentified data generated by the study (questionnaire responses, biological sample results) will be made available in a public data repository within one year of study protocol closure by the responsible ethics committees. Data obtained from participants routinely collected clinic and laboratory records are owned by the South Africa National Department of Health and cannot be shared by the authors.
