Abstract
Objective Despite evidence that cross-modal effects after hearing loss and cochlear implantation are primarily conveyed through synaptic gain and efficacy rather than reorganized fiber tracts, few studies have assessed cross-modal functional connectivity (CMFC) to evaluate plasticity. This study, inspired by the psychophysiological interactions (PPI) method, addresses its limitations and provides a robust approach to evaluating task-induced CMFC.
Design Twenty-two post-lingually deafened, newly implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with severe hearing loss in the contralateral ear and 17 normal-hearing (NH) subjects participated. The experiment included audio-only and visual-only speech tasks, with resting-state FC as a baseline. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured brain imaging data one month and one year post-implantation. CI users’ speech understanding performance was evaluated one year after implantation.
Results A negative correlation was found between average contralateral task-induced CMFC and speech outcomes, particularly in links from the angular gyrus (AG), both one month and one year post-activation. Plastic changes showed higher task-induced CMFC in AG compared to the superior temporal gyrus (STG), aligning with neural efficiency principles. Task-induced CMFC remained elevated in CI users compared to NH cohorts even after one year.
Conclusion Task-induced CMFC can serve as a significant marker of cross-modal plasticity and speech performance in CI recipients, indicating increased reliance on cross-modal processing in one year after implantation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to Colette M. McKay. Tommy Peng was supported by a Junior Fellowship from the Passe and Williams Foundation. Jamal Esmaelpoor was supported by the University of Melbourne Research Scholarship. The Bionics Institute acknowledges the support it receives from the Victorian Government through its Operational Infrastructure Support Program.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (ethics approval 19.1418H). All participants provided informed written consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
