Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy has emerged as a significant global challenge impacting healthcare institutions, workplaces and governments alike. Despite concerted efforts by the government and numerous other institutions in South Africa, low vaccination rates persist (33% as of November 13, 2023), reflecting the persistence of this global challenge. This challenge is particularly pronounced in educational institutions such as institutions of higher learning in South Africa, where many people converge, increasing the risk of viral exposure. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of healthcare workers (HCWs) at a Nursing College regarding voluntary and mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. Employing a quantitative approach, a survey with closed-ended Likert-type questions was administered to 504 individuals at the College. The sample size of 218 respondents was calculated based on a margin of error of 5%, a confidence level of 95%, and an additional 25% contingency for potential incomplete data, resulting in a final representative sample of 270 respondents. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for the analysis. Findings indicate a high uptake of voluntary COVID-19 vaccinations among HCWs, with some being mandated. Most HCWs demonstrated a strong commitment to safeguarding themselves and others. Despite concerns, HCWs thought the COVID-19 vaccines were effective, and their views were supported by a low level of infection among the participants, underscoring its efficacy in preventing transmission. Effective communication emerged as a critical factor in addressing post-vaccination behaviours and enhancing vaccine acceptance. However, the findings also highlighted the need for tailored outreach strategies to specific audiences, such as pregnant women, and the importance of addressing concerns about adverse effects through clear and open communication. Several factors influencing the choice between mandatory and voluntary vaccination were identified, including eligibility concerns, religious convictions, and financial considerations. Notably, concerns about safety and knowledge gaps outweighed these factors, suggesting the need for targeted educational initiatives to bolster vaccine acceptance. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of vaccination acceptance among an influential occupational group, with implications for the acceptance of other vaccines. Vaccination efforts can be strengthened by addressing concerns, enhancing communication strategies, and tailoring outreach efforts to promote public health in light of future outbreaks.
Author summary Conception and design of the study: LM, TS
Data acquisition: LM
Data analysis: LM
Interpretation of the data: LM, TS
Drafting of the paper: LM
Critical revision of the paper: TS
Both authors approved the final manuscript
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was self-funded.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Johannesburg's Ethics Review Committee [ethical clearance number REC 2298 2023.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon request and within the prescripts of the Protection 525 of Personal Information Act (POPIAct).