Abstract
Background Kenya is one of the African countries that have pledged to reduce neonatal death as per the World Health Organization set target by 2030. Providing high-quality newborn care is critical in minimizing neonatal mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence the quality of newborn care in Kenya.
Methods Secondary data from 11,863 participants of the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) 2022 were analyzed. The participants were chosen using a two-stage stratified sampling method. The quality of newborn care was operationalized as receiving all components of newborn care after childbirth, as reported by the mother. To identify the factors associated with the quality of newborn care, multivariable logistic regression was carried out using SPSS (version 20).
Results In this study, 32.7% (95% CI: 31.0-34.5) of the mothers reported that their newborns had received all components of quality neonatal care after childbirth. Mothers who subscribed to the Christian (3.60 (95%CI: 1.32-9.83) or Muslim faith (3.88 (95%CI: 1.29-11.67) compared with those from other faiths, were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who spent an average of one hour accessing the health facilities compared with those who spent less than half an hour were 1.33 (95%CI: 1.01-1.75) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who gave birth in a non-government organization health facility were 30.37 (95%CI: 2.69-343.20) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care compared with those who delivered from a faith-based organization.
On the contrary, in terms of regions, Mothers who lived in Nyanza, Eastern, and Rift Valley provinces compared with those who lived in the coastal regions were 0.53 (95%CI: 0.34-0.82), 0.61 (95%CI: 0.39-0.94), and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.41-0.93) times less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care, respectively. Finally, mothers who gave birth through cesarean section were 0.44 (95%CI: 0.32-0.61) times less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care than mothers who gave birth through spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Conclusion The study indicates about a third of the neonates (1 in 3) received quality newborn care. This study seems to suggest that facility-related and parental social factors are associated with receiving quality newborn care. Several stakeholders including health care providers may need to pay more attention to newborn babies whose mothers come from marginalized regions of the country, minority religious faith denominations, and those delivered by ceasearen section. Stakeholders should focus on strengthening collaborations with NGO health facilities and achieving universal health coverage to improve the quality of neonatal care. Also, the government could utilize minority faith denominations as an avenue for staging sensitization about quality neonatal health services.
Introduction
Quality of newborn care is the safe and efficient healthcare delivered on time to improve the health outcomes of newborns [1]. Quality newborn care is critical in assisting babies to adapt to the extrauterine environment, thus, reducing neonatal death by 25% [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of ensuring quality care for neonates during the postpartum period as recommended in the form of assessing the newborn’s temperature, checking the umbilical cord, counseling, and observing the mother on breastfeeding [3]. Some other components of quality neonatal care include the management of hypothermia, management of neonatal sepsis and other medical conditions, birth from a skilled attendant and the health facility, examination of the baby, skin-to-skin care, and immunization [4, 5]
Despite the decline in under-five mortality worldwide in response to efforts to address it, deaths remain concentrated in the very first days of life indicating the need to attend to quality neonatal care demands[6]. The World Health Organization estimated approximately 2.4 million newborn deaths in 2019, which accounted for over 45% of under-five deaths worldwide. Additionally, a persistent slow reduction in newborn mortality was also reported in the East African region [7]. The first 28 days of life present a very crucial period when babies are most vulnerable to health challenges and face a higher risk of death with the global mortality rate standing at 17 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2022 [8]. However, the rate is rather higher in sub-Saharan countries (Kenya inclusive), which contributes almost 57% of the worldwide mortality rate, with rates of 21 deaths per 1000 live births in low and middle-income countries [1, 9, 10]. All these mortality rates exceed the projected sustainable development goal target of 12 deaths for every 1000 live births by 2030. [11].
The high newborn mortality rate is attributed to poor quality newborn care which includes delayed initiation of breastfeeding [12–14]. Above all, providing quality newborn care has been reported to be low in African countries like Kenya where the neonatal mortality rate is still a healthcare challenge accounting for 40% of under-five mortality rates [15–18]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, challenges to delivering newborn care are multi-faceted and include poor healthcare infrastructure, social-cultural environments, lack of adherence to clinical guidelines, and inadequate political will by governments[19–21]. The World Health Organization guidelines on postnatal care emphasize the provision of quality newborn care as a means of reducing preventable neonatal mortality [22].
Evidence from the literature indicated that the level of education, monthly income, age of the mother, number of antenatal visits, and knowledge of newborn care by the mothers were some of the factors associated with the quality of newborn care [23–25]. Other sociocultural determinants of the quality of newborn care include residency, maternal employment, pregnancy intention, health facility accessibility, occupation, parity, and counseling during the perinatal period.[26–29]. Furthermore, healthcare system-related factors related to the quality of neonatal care include the presence of health workers at workstations, access to evidence-based guidelines, working environment, communication skills, and supervision [30].
To achieve the sustainable development target 3.2 of eliminating unnecessary deaths of newborns and children under the age of five, there is a need to monitor the quality of newborn care delivered by healthcare providers in countries with limited resources like Kenya where neonatal mortality is still high [22]. Some studies that have been used to draw recommendations in Kenya like prioritizing the need to strengthen existing facilities, increasing access to standard inpatient neonatal care, and developing effective referral systems to improve neonatal care, [31] are not conducted on nationally representative populations. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with the quality of newborn care as reported by the mothers using nationally representative data from Kenya. Identifying these factors is crucial in developing efficient interventions to combat neonatal mortality and morbidity in Kenya and sub-Saharan Africa at large.
Methods
Data source, sample design, and collection
This study used data from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS). The survey used a two-stage stratified sampling approach in which the first step involved using equal probabilities and random selection to choose 1692 clusters from a master sample frame of 129,067 clusters taken from the 2019 Kenya population and housing census. The second stage entailed house listing to create a sampling frame whereby 25 households for each cluster were chosen. If a cluster contained fewer than 25 households, all of them were sampled. In total, 1691 clusters were surveyed. The Inner-City Fund (ICF) aided with the training of data collectors and pre-testing of study materials. Data was collected from February to July 2022.
All women between 15 and 49 years who were either regular members of the selected families or had resided in those homes the night preceding the survey were interviewed about newborn care in English or Swahili. Out of 32,156 women who responded to the questionnaire, 11,863 had recently given birth within the previous five years [10]. The MEASURE DHS website (https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm) gave us specific permission to utilize the 2022 KDHS dataset. Although the dataset comprised several variables, only those that were relevant to our research were included in the analysis.
Study variables
Dependent/outcomes
The main outcome variable in this study was the mothers’ reported quality of newborn care. The quality of newborn care was an aggregate variable estimated from several binary outcomes (yes or no), which included whether the newborn received certain services from medical professionals after birth, as reported by their mother. The services included obtaining delivery assistance from a skilled health provider, weighing the newborn, taking the newborn’s temperature, placing the newborn on the mother’s breast within the first hour after delivery, observing the mother while breastfeeding their newborns, teaching the mother ways to clean the baby’s umbilical cord, examining the newborn’s umbilical cord, advising the mothers regarding risk indicators of neonatal illness (danger signs), and guiding or counseling the mother on breastfeeding. As reported by the mother, receiving all the newborn care services implied that one had received quality newborn care (yes) or not (no), if one skipped ≥1 of the 9 services. [20, 32–34].
Independent variables
Based on the existing literature and the availability of the data in DHS, the factors taken into account in the analysis were classified into three categories: parental, health facility, obstetric, and child-related characteristics [16, 20, 33, 35, 36]. The analysis examined 11 parental factors such as the age of the mother (35-49, 20-34, 15-19 years), residence (urban or rural), maternal and husband education (tertiary, none/primary, secondary), region (Nyanza, Eastern, Rift Valley, Nairobi, Coast, Central, Western Northeastern), maternal and husband working status (yes or no), and religion (Christian, Muslim, or others). The wealth index was generated from the 2022 KDHS data on household ownership of assets using the principal component analysis and categorized into 5 categories (poorest to richest). Whereas maternal autonomy was measured using two proxy variables: who heads the family (male or female) and who makes healthcare decisions for the mother/participant (self, partner, together with partner or someone else, or others). We included ten health facility, obstetric, and child-related factors in the analysis. Obstetric factors comprised pregnancy wantedness (no or yes), ages at first birth in 5-year age groups, antenatal (ANC) visits (≥4 or ≤3), mode of delivery (cesarean or vaginal), the birth interval in months (≤24 or ≥25) and pregnancy losses (≥1 or 0). Child factors included the sex of the child (male or female). Lastly, health facility factors included the specific place of childbirth (private, public, clinics, faith-based organizations, and Non-governmental Organizational health facilities). The analysis considered minutes to a healthcare facility of birth (≤30, 31-60, ≥61) as a proxy for access to the facility.
Statistical analysis
Before analyzing the data, it was cleansed, and dummy variables were developed. Descriptive statistics such as percentages were generated at the univariate level for all the categorical variables. We computed univariate logistic regression analyses, to find independent factors related to neonatal care quality. To investigate the factors correlated with newborn care quality while adjusting for other variables, any variables with P-values below 0.05 were added in a simple multivariate logistic regression model. The confidence intervals corresponding to 95% for all odd ratios are presented. The data was analyzed using SPSS’s complex samples module (V20), which accounted for the complex sample design present in DHS data.
The complex sample package provides accurate parameter estimates by accounting for clustering, weighting, and sample stratification that occurred during the study participants’ selection. [37, 38]. The sample weights were also added to all frequencies calculated to ensure the representativeness of the study results and account for unequal probability sampling across various strata [37]. A variance inflation factor (VIF) of less than 10 was utilized as a criterion to test multi-collinearity among all predictor variables in the model, during preliminary analyses [37, 38].
Ethical consideration
The Inner-City Fund (ICF) Institutional Review Board gave ethical clearance to conduct the KDHS. The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics conducted the study in partnership with other stakeholders. Given that the secondary data was publicly available, no ethical authorization was required to investigate it. However, MEASURE DHS provided access to the 2022 KDHS datasets. (https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm). Human participants provided written informed permission, as did legally designated representatives of minor participants.
Results
Demographic characteristics of the mothers of the newborn babies
DHS data about the quality of newborn care was obtained from 11,863 women who had recently given birth within five years preceding the survey (Table 1). The majority (74.4%) of women were aged 20 to 34, were from Eastern, Nairobi, Rift Valley, Central, and Nyanza provinces (76.7%), and lived in rural regions (61.4%). Moreover, 40% belonged to the richer (21.2%) and richest (22.7%) quintiles. The majority were Christian (88.5%), had completed at most secondary education (80.5%), and were working (57.3%). Furthermore, the majority of the participants’ spouses were employed (91%), and 55.9% had completed their secondary education. The majority of participants (71.5%) lived in male-headed households and decided to seek health care services alongside their spouses or someone else (44.9%). Most participants gave birth while they were under 24 years old (87.1%), had a pregnancy interval of not less than two years following their previous delivery (75.4%), desired to have the most recent pregnancy (91.2%), recorded at most four total antennal visits (67.2%), and lived within 30minutes from the health facilities (73.1). Most mothers gave birth to newborn babies by vaginal birth (82.9%), and at public health facilities (65.2%). About half of neonates were male sex (51%). Additionally, fewer participants had pregnancy loss (23%).
Quality of newborn care
Overall, 32.7% of the mothers reported that their newborns had received all components of neonatal care (quality newborn care) after childbirth (Table 2). Among the components of newborn care, 90.4% of the mothers reported that their newborns were delivered by a skilled health provider, 78.1 % had their newborn’s umbilical cord examined by a health care worker, 88.2% were weighed, and had their temperature taken (72%). In addition, 59.8% of neonates were placed on the mother’s breast by a medical professional within the first hour of birth. Participating mothers were instructed on ways to clean their newborn’s umbilical cords (73.9%), observed during breastfeeding babies by medical professionals (75.8%), and given breastfeeding counseling (77.6%) or information about danger signs related to newborn sickness (77.6%).
Factors associated with the quality of newborn care
Table 3 summarizes the factors associated with the quality of neonatal care in logistic regression analysis. In multivariate logistic regression, mothers who subscribed to the Christian (3.60 (95%CI: 1.32-9.83) or Muslim faith (3.88 (95%CI: 1.29-11.67) compared with those from other faiths, were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who spent an average of one hour accessing the health facilities compared with those who spent less than half an hour were 1.33 (95%CI: 1.01-1.75) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who gave birth in a non-government organization health facility were 30.37 (95%CI: 2.69-343.20) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care compared with those who delivered from a faith-based organization.
On the contrary, in terms of regions, mothers who lived in Nyanza, Eastern, and Rift Valley provinces compared with those who lived in the coastal regions were 0.53 (95%CI: 0.34-0.82), 0.61 (95%CI: 0.39-0.94), and 0.62(95%CI: 0.41-0.93) times less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care, respectively. Finally, mothers who gave birth via cesarean section were 0.44 (95%CI: 0.32-0.61) times less likely to report that their babies received quality newborn care than those who gave birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Discussion
The study determined the factors associated with the quality of newborn care in Kenya using the 2022 KDHS. Overall, 32.7% of the mothers reported that their newborns had received all components of neonatal care (quality newborn care) after childbirth. These results are lower compared to the overall quality of neonatal care reported in Ethiopia at 66.3% and 38.4% respectively [39, 40]. Among the components of neonatal care, 90.4% of the newborns were delivered by a skilled health provider. This is higher than 86% recorded globally [41], 79.2%, and 51.8% recorded in Benin and Kembata, Ethiopia, respectively [42, 43]. However, 78.1 % had their newborn’s umbilical cord examined by a healthcare worker which is similar to 75.4% and 70.3% recorded in Ethiopia and Senegal respectively [39, 44]. 73.9% of participating mothers were shown how to clean their umbilical cord higher than 66% recorded in Wakiso, Uganda [45]. Additionally, 59.8% of the newborns were placed on the mother’s breast within 1 hour after birth by a healthcare worker, higher than the global rate of 45% [46], 29.4%, and 47.8% recorded in Senegal and India respectively [44, 47],
In this study, 75.8% of mothers were observed while breastfeeding their newborns by health care professionals, while 77.6% received breastfeeding counseling which is higher compared to 31.9% recorded in a study by Hassounah et al. [48]. In this study, 77.6% of mothers were counseled about danger signs associated with newborn illness (77.6%), 88.2% were weighed and 72% had their temperature taken. In sum, although the overall quality of newborn care reported by the mothers appears low, statistics about specific components of that care paint a seemingly positive picture of a better quality of newborn care in Kenya when compared to previous studies, which can be attributed to several initiatives by the government of Kenya to improve maternal and child health care such as the free maternal and newborn care policy [49, 50].
Mothers who lived in Nyanza, Eastern, and Rift Valley provinces compared with those who lived in the coastal regions were less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. This study’s findings about the 3 counties could be supported by the fact that these are underdeveloped counties that were considered disadvantaged regions by Kenya’s presidential initiatives for improvement of the quality of maternal and child health services [49–51]. Such areas may not have attained quality health care services thus explaining the poor quality of neonatal care received. Such findings are also consistent with a study in Ethiopia that found the marginalization (disregard) of neonatal health services in rural and underdeveloped regions reducing the quality of neonatal health services in such areas [52]. Such regions need to be given priority when it comes to the distribution of newborn-related health care services by ministries of health in Kenya and other sub-Saharan countries.
Mothers who subscribed to the Christian or Muslim faith compared with those from other faiths, were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. This may be because the biggest population in Kenya is made up of Christians and Muslims. Studies have observed that religion is a great predictor of neonatal health outcomes [53]. This could be explained by the positive impact of some religions as documented by Brelsford et al. [54] where some mothers were more likely to comply with newborn quality care practices as compared to other religions. This finding presents such denominations as a platform for presenting newborn health-related information to the populations through sensitization.
Furthermore, mothers who gave birth through cesarean section were less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care when compared with those who gave birth through spontaneous vaginal delivery. This could be because mothers after cesarean section are less physically functioning as compared to those who have a safe vaginal delivery and hence are unable to cooperate with health workers fully in initiating interventions like timely breastfeeding and thermoregulation of neonates compromising the quality of neonatal care [55]. Studies have also associated the ceasarian section with higher incidences of neonatal complications and mortality. Such babies are prone to adverse conditions like concomitant diarrhea and acute respiratory infections [56, 57]. Therefore, the level of care needed by such babies may not be easily realizable in low-resource settings of Kenya, as compared to those that deliver vaginally. This calls for capacity building of health professionals by government and nongovernment stakeholders in delivering advanced neonatal interventions in facilities authorized to perform cesarian sections.
Mothers who gave birth in a non-government organization health facilities were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care compared with those who delivered from public and faith-based organizations. These results concur with results from other studies that found that public and private health facilities lack essential supplies and equipment needed to provide quality newborn care, and lack basic and effective aspects of essential newborn care like skin-to-skin contact between mother and babies as compared to other facilities[58, 59]. Scholars have highlighted the important role played by NGOs in providing quality health care and the need for government authorities to seek collaborations with such organizations [60, 61]. NGOs have been noted to have continuity of quality care which is affordable as compared to other facilities thereby necessitating authorities to facilitate a good environment for their operations[62]. NGOs provide quality health care since they focus their resources on delivering healthcare outcomes unlike governments that may focus on divergent political and social agendas when providing healthcare[63]
Mothers who spent an average of one hour accessing the health facilities compared with those who spent less than half an hour were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Unlike in this study, increased travel time to the delivery facility has been associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and complications [64]. Therefore, we recommend further studies by researchers to explore why mothers nearest the health facilities were more likely to report low-quality newborn care compared to those from far away from the health facilities. In sum, this study seems to suggest that facility-related and parental social factors are associated with receiving quality newborn care.
Study Strengths and Limitations
Data from the Kenya Demographic Health Survey 2022 was weighted and is nationally representative, therefore our results can be generalizable to all newborns in Kenya. Furthermore, DHS is known for high response rates and consistent quality data collection techniques across states, thus our results are comparable to studies conducted elsewhere of the same design. However, because this study used a cross-sectional design, its conclusions are imprecise in demonstrating causality, and there is a possibility of recall bias from the participants because this study was based on self-reported data. Despite its limitations, this study presents useful information on factors influencing the quality of newborn care in Kenya.
Conclusions
This study revealed that the overall quality of newborn care was way below average, with some vital components of care scoring below the UN projected targets for SDG 3. These results highlight a gap in neonatal health care provision hence the need for responsible stakeholders to take action. This study also seems to suggest that facility-related and parental social factors are associated with receiving quality newborn care. The findings therefore show very low quality of neonatal care in some counties of Kenya prompting the government to prioritize universal health coverage hence even distribution of neonatal health services to such marginalized areas to improve accessibility and quality of neonatal health services. Emphasis should also be put on newborns born by the ceasarian section since they are at high risk of receiving low quality newborn care. Therefore, this calls for capacity building of health professionals by government and nongovernment stakeholders in delivering advanced neonatal interventions in facilities authorized to perform cesarian sections. Government authorities and other stakeholders should also target religious denominations as a platform for sensitizing citizens about neonatal health care services. Collaborations between government authorities and NGO health facilities or newborn centers of excellence could also facilitate the provision of quality care.
Abbreviations
- KDHS
- Kenya Demographic Health Survey
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- AOR
- Adjusted Odds Ratio
- VIF
- Variance Inflation Factor
- COR
- Crude Odds Ratio
- DHS
- Demographic Health Survey
- EA
- Enumeration area
- OR
- Odds Ratio
- WHO
- World Health Organisation
DECLARATIONS
Competing interests
All authors of this paper disclose that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Funding
This study received no funding.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
MEASURE DHS surveys uphold high universal moral standards, and the study process adheres to relevant regulations. The ICF Institutional Review Board assessed and approved the protocol for the 2022 KDHS survey. Human participants provided written informed permission, as did legally designated representatives of minor participants.
Availability of data and materials
This data is freely available upon request from the MEASURE DHS website (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm). However, the researchers in this study have no right to share this data set with the public. Those interested in the data set may obtain it with full permission from the MEASURE DHS (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm).
Authors’ contributions
Concept and proposal development: John Baptist Asiimwe, Lilian Nuwabaine.
Data analysis: John Baptist Asiimwe, Lilian Nuwabaine, Joseph Kawuki, Quraish Sserwanja, Angella Namulema, Mathius Amperiize, Earnest Amwiine, Shamim Nabidda, Imelda Nmaatovu
Writing (original draft): John Baptist Asiimwe, Lilian Nuwabaine, Joseph Kawuki, Quraish Sserwanja, Angella Namulema, Mathius Amperiize, Earnest Amwiine, Shamim Nabidda, Imelda Nmaatovu
Writing (review and editing): John Baptist Asiimwe, Lilian Nuwabaine, Joseph Kawuki, Quraish Sserwanja, Angella Namulema, Mathius Amperiize, Earnest Amwiine, Shamim Nabidda, Imelda Nmaatovu
Acknowledgments
We thank the DHS program for making the data available for this investigation.
References
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos