Abstract
Falciparum malaria is a substantial public health problem. Vaccines and monoclonal antibodies targeting the Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) circumsporozoite protein (CSP) are promising control strategies. The protective mechanisms of anti-PfCSP antibodies are incompletely understood, and levels of anti-PfCSP antibodies are inconsistently predictive of protection. We undertook controlled human malaria infections in volunteers vaccinated with the PfCSP-based vaccine R21/Matrix-M, using either intradermal injection (ID) or direct venous inoculation (DVI) of P. falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ Challenge). R21/Matrix-M was highly protective against intradermal inoculation of PfSPZ Challenge (i.e. 100%, 12 out of 12) but not protective against PfSPZ Challenge by DVI (i.e. 0%, 0 out of 5). These findings imply that the variable delivery of Pf sporozoites into capillaries rather than the subdermal layers by infectious mosquito bites can account for the inconsistent protection provided by anti-PfCSP antibodies.
Competing Interest Statement
AVSH and KJE are named as co-inventors on patent applications related to R21. KJE was an employee of the University of Oxford at the time of the work and is now an employee of GSK and owns restricted shares in GSK. YA, ERJ, PFB, TLR, BKLS and SLH are salaried, full-time employees of Sanaria, the manufacturer of Sanaria PfSPZ Challenge. All the other authors declare that there are no competing interests or have no additional financial interests.
Clinical Trial
The study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03947190 and alternative registration with PACTR identifier PACTR202108505632810 to comply with in-country regulatory requirements.
Funding Statement
This work was funded as part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (grant number RIA2016V-1649-MMVC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approvals were obtained from a National IRB in Kenya and the relevant Oxford IRB (i.e. SERU (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/158/3844) and OxTREC (OxTREC 32-19)) and from the medicines regulatory authority in Kenya (i.e. Pharmacy and Poisons Board (ECCT/19/11/01)).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
The datasets presented in this study can be found at the online repository for KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme: Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TNHS14.
