Abstract
Background and Objectives Social isolation can be quantified using indicators across a range of social contexts e.g., household composition, friends and family, employment and community. Little is known about the way in which different forms of isolation differentially impact health, whether they produce a ‘dose-response’ effect, and whether different forms of isolation interact in an additive or multiplicative way to impact psychological distress, life satisfaction and general health. The current study focuses on social isolation in mid-life – a life stage often neglected by the field.
Research Design and Method Data (N=32,391) were analysed from two successive British birth cohort studies: 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) N=16,585 and the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) N=15,806 focusing on participants’ social isolation during mid-life (ages 42-46). Linear multivariable regression models were run to investigate the independent, ‘dose-response’ and interactive associations of social isolation indicators with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated general health. Subsequently, all models were stratified to examine sex differences, and a cohort interaction was tested to assess cohort effects. An additional latent class analysis investigated whether different forms of isolation cluster in mid-life.
Results Independent associations varied by form of isolation and specific health outcomes, for instance, being out of education and employment was associated with all outcomes, living alone was only associated with lower life satisfaction and a lack of frequent contact with friends and relatives, no labour market participation and limited community engagement were associated with lower life satisfaction and self-rated general health. There was a ‘dose-response’ relationship with higher social isolation scores associated with greater psychological distress, lower life satisfaction, and poorer self-reported general health. The effects of different combinations of social isolation on health appears to be additive, with no consistent sex and cohort differences observed.
Conclusions Results support a multi-domain, multi-context approach to studying social isolation and provides justification for research that investigates the separate and combined effects of different forms of social isolation; and the relevance of investigating social isolation in relation to the complete state of physical, mental and social wellbeing. Overall, isolation in its various forms was found to be detrimental for health, in mid-life, and over time in Great Britain. In particular, social isolation was associated most consistently with lower levels of life satisfaction. Efforts to reduce social isolation and its negative health impacts must recognise the complexity of experience across contexts and for different populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
UKs Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) grant number: ES/T007575/1
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University College London, UCL Social Research Institute, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2024). 1970 British Cohort Study. [data series]. 11th Release. UK Data Service. SN: 200001, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-Series-200001 University College London, UCL Social Research Institute, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2024). National Child Development Study. [data series]. 14th Release. UK Data Service. SN: 2000032, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-Series-2000032
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵+ Shared senior authors
Data Availability
Data openly available via the UK Data Service: University College London, UCL Social Research Institute, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2024). 1970 British Cohort Study. [data series]. 11th Release. UK Data Service. SN: 200001, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-Series-200001 University College London, UCL Social Research Institute, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2024). National Child Development Study. [data series]. 14th Release. UK Data Service. SN: 2000032, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-Series-2000032